Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
10 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
anonym0507
1 year ago

It’s not really bad now, but it’s still working out. Of course, depends on which class you are. But I think it would be very good to point out the meaning of the Erlkönig to explain that the Son is dead in the end. And generally to say that it is very bad for the son and the father is very hurrying and it is not just about a ride home. Besides, you should be careful not to start two consecutive sentences equal (2x “The Father”)

Lehrer920449949
1 year ago
Reply to  anonym0507

I’m sorry but it’s not even a 4 if she were my student

Chaosgirl587
1 year ago

Somehow my previous answer has been lost… Menno but no matter what

Here comes your personal German teacher😂🫶👍

Sooooo… Of course, everything’s just how it feels better.
In the introduction the year is missing again, but the author is in The topic is described again with some too many details, perhaps you will try to read texts in general and summarize the topic very briefly (can send me the results then also 😉)

In the main part, on the other hand, there are little details, so you could have described the scenery a little more precisely. Besides, you should be careful to stay in the present (“he jammerte”), but this time is very good, the linguistic distance from the original is, so you have really written in your own words, that is already good and important.

Overall you have improved well😊

LG Chaosgirl splitter️

PS: maybe write a content statement to Paddy Finnegal or what he said, we had to believe in doing this at the time 😉

HEsslhoFF21
1 year ago
Reply to  Chaosgirl587

Can I write something else?

So:

… late at night rides home. The son is obviously seriously ill, for when they finally arrive, the child died during the ride in his father’s poor. [You always have to tell the end in an IA. Not exciting]

I’m trying to write a distance:

The father notices that his son looks terrified and anxious. It follows from the conversation that the son has Fieber fantasies: he is as if he saw a figurine, the king of Erl, who conjures him to come with him. The father speaks soothingly to his son, but the fantasies are too alive, he no longer reaches his son. In the end, the Erlkönig catches the child, so we experience it with the child, knowing that the shielding is not a reality, but the imagination of the dying child, which is so strong that in the end, like the child, we also believe that the main figure, the Erlkönig, took the child into his kingdom (of death).

HEsslhoFF21
1 year ago
Reply to  Chaosgirl587

But I don’t want to interfere with you, I just did it … A personal German teacher, congratulations to you both, have a lot of fun and knowledge together!

Chaosgirl587
1 year ago
Reply to  HEsslhoFF21

Thank you

Ghostwriter2
1 year ago

Some errors, in particular the deviation from the present, have already been mentioned.

In addition:

“Then it also saw the Father”. This sentence is at least doubtful; the father just saw not the Erlroy, but saw and heard natural phenomena (Nebel, Wind …), he tried to find a rational explanation.

gutifragerno
1 year ago

Good start, but then you get into the time form of the past. This should be avoided in a content specification. Because this is a kind of analysis and all analyses are always written in the present, because that is present at the moment when you analyze it. You weren’t there when the Erlroy crossed the father with his son. 😉 Moreover, this has probably never happened so much, but Goethe has thought it out. 😉

Jojooxx
3 months ago

Heyyy, so your content is essentially not bad! However, you should note one, this is that you did not understand the ballad! It often happens at the Erlkönig. Actually, the son is sick and he only hallucinates!That’s why the father doesn’t see the Erlroy. Besides, look at the time you write:)

LG Jojoxxx