I have to write a history paper, and I'm writing about gunpowder in modern times. I'll clearly write the explanation and the production process in the present tense. But I'm also writing about the history, the production process at that time, and the military system. Can I write these in the past tense? Because that's how it was back then, and the story takes place in the past.
(2 votes)
Loading...Hello, Can someone tell me if the comma is placed correctly here: “Please keep a record of the return.”
Hello dear child psychologists, my 7-year-old son was tested by a psychologist for ADHD, which also included an IQ test. He's "above average" or just above average in all areas, so everything's pretty normal. However, with a score of 133 in language, he's said to be in the gifted range (one in 10 falls there,…
1 I would like to take two more weeks of vacation. 2 I would like to take two other weeks of vacation. 3 I would like to take another two weeks of vacation.
2.have 3 is 4.find 5.buy
“Clouds embrace the earth,” what does the personification do?
Can you say that "to be occupied" is a two-part verb? I mean, it's about the number of words.
Ja, das Präteritum ist für eine wissenschaftliche Betrachtung oder Hausarbeit besser. Das historische Präsens ist hier nicht empfehlenswert.
Also das heißt , wenn ich die Geschichte schildere, dann kann ich präzeritum verwenden ?
Das solltest du sogar.
Das Präsens bei historischen Aspekten nimmt man normalerweise in der erzählenden Literatur. “Gestern treffe ich einen alten Freund und wir sprechen über alte Zeiten.” Diese Form sollte bei einer wissenschaftlichen Betrachtung der Geschichte nicht benutzt werden. Sicherlich findet man sie gelegentlich, aber allgemein wird davon abgeraten.