Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
IA3007
8 months ago

Yeah, it is.

Tannibi
8 months ago
Reply to  IA3007

“in large parts of mathematics”? then

* ln (0) = ln (1) = 0

but the logarithm is not defined for arguments <= 0.

IA3007
8 months ago
Reply to  Tannibi

Right, ln(x -> 0) goes against (-infinitely).

Tannibi
8 months ago

I understand. But if 0^0 were defined
it would also be n(0), and that is not it.

ChrisGE1267
8 months ago

0^0 is undefined – although it can be defined as 1, there are problems for this at a different point: if, after the same argument, 0 is equal to 0, then it should be 0^0 = 0. You see the problem?

GreenxPiece
8 months ago

As already mentioned several times, 0^0 has no clear definition in mathematics. Interesting is, however, if you let the function f(x) = x^x run from right to 0. The limit value is then 1.

LoverOfPi
8 months ago
Reply to  GreenxPiece

The problem is that 0^x for x goes against 0 and x^0 go 1.

dallie257
8 months ago

No, because you can equally argue 0^k is always 0 and therefore must be 00 0

Rubezahl2000
8 months ago

0 high 0 is not clearly defined in mathematics.

Uwe65527
8 months ago

Each positive Number high 0 gives 1.0^0 is not defined and also not for negative figures.

GuteAntwort2021
8 months ago

Hello.

There is no general answer to the question, as there are both arguments for it and against it.

LG

Hoegaard
8 months ago
Tannibi
8 months ago

0^0 is undefined.