Similar Posts
Benzos?
Are benzos considered strong drugs?
What is more harmful?
Is it more harmful to drink every 2-3 weeks (i.e., a lot) or to take a few Xanax and weed once a month? Please, no "preferably nothing at all" comments; I know what I'm talking about, guys.
First time smoking as a teenager, stories?
I realize this question sounds strange. As part of a school project, I have to answer the question of why young people start smoking. I'm interested in the following: 1. When you first smoked 2. Why this was done 3. Did you continue and if so, why 4. How did this situation come about in…
I'm on vacation with 3 friends, so drinking?
We all drank the same amount but they were completely drunk afterwards and I didn't really feel anything even though we have a 30 kg difference, I should feel something
Smoking at 15?
ByFzlite
Hello, I'm 15 and I smoke 1-2 cigarettes every now and then. Is that really harmful? A few of my friends, the same age, smoke 5-8 cigarettes every day.
Smoke creations – what does that mean?
Created: 17. June 2018
What likes to salt Smokers has a name in the medical language: COPD (chronic obstructive disease).
Behind this is a longer-existing condition of the respiratory tract, usually a combination of chronic bronchitis and narrowing of the bronchi. As a result, the lung bubbles are overflated. The performance of the affected persons decreases sharply, the susceptibility to infections increases. Bronchial carcinoma. Often the -> lung cancer remains pain-free for a long time, then breast pain, cough (sometimes with bloody ejection), weight loss, dullness, pneumonia and other symptoms occur.
And how does a smoke arise? In the mucous membrane, the mica cells ensure that inhaled dirt particles together with mucous membrane can be conveyed upwards and coughed out. Smoking but destroys these flicker cells. The result: The mucus thawing promotes the colonization of germs and the formation of inflammation (bronchitis).
Recurring inflammation makes the bronchi walls thicker. This constriction and constipation by increased mucus leads to the expansion of the lung blisters (emphysem). Breathing is harder for those affected. The exchange of gas between breathing air and blood is hindered, and the oxygen in the blood becomes less. Short breath and a strong cough with eject are the consequences. Also pneumonia accumulate. In the late stage, the lips become blue.
An X-ray examination is recommended in order to assess the extent of smoking. Better still is a computer tomography, which protects the patient and allows the doctor an exact diagnosis. Lung function testing, EKG, laboratory testing of blood values and sputum control (analysis of ejection) are also on the investigation program.
However, the disease can only be stopped if the patient stops smoking. This is worth it at any time and brings – you’re surprised – the lung function even back to the “normal” level of a non-smoker!
https://www.lungenemphysem-copd.de/information/disorders/243-general/2986-raucherlunge-what-meaning-unique
From a certain age, black deposits are found in almost all people. The lung is not completely black from the deposits, but rather gray with spot-shaped black deposits, which is also called anthracosis. The more soot and tar are inhaled, the more of these deposits there are. In the known shock images on cigarette packs, the lungs are particularly severely damaged. But these are the real dangers that smokers threaten – and they are not exaggerated.
https://aproposgesund.de/right-or-falsch-die-truheit-ueber-die-lunge/#:~:text=The%20saucherlunge%20spechblack.&text=Schwärzliche%20Settings%20s%20sab,man%20snennt%20snenalso%20suntil%20Anthracosis.
Black pigment deposits can be found practically in any lung – whether the cause is tobacco consumption can only be anaesthetized.
https://www.derstandard.at/story/1353207512492/die-schwarze-raucherlunge—ein-mythos
So yes, the so-called smoking is fake, but it should not mean that cigarette consumption is not harmful to the lungs!
Right. It’s biologically impossible. The lung has a self-cleaning function.
Surely small amounts of tar and other substances are deposited from tobacco smoke on the lungs and a little bit of it never goes away… more problematical and more logical are scaring due to loud little infection heart
That’s right. There is no “black” lung. A well-known legal physician has quoted it roughly, saying: “If you smoked 20 years or lived 20 years in Berlin on a main street, you don’t recognize the difference on a lung.”
Edit:
Searched. Was not Berlin, but the highway 😉
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcJKeJnbl1o&ab_channel=tvlocales
I have also read that the presentations for images are more to be attributed to an industrialization. But as a person concerned, I can tell you the color doesn’t matter. 😂
No, the tar should always make it black.
Yes, it’s rough and scarce to summarize this