Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ZaoDaDong
5 months ago

If you plan to encrypt your plate, then take NTFS. If you want maximum compatibility, then exFAT.

NTFS should be more powerful and robust if you choose the standard cluster size.

norbertk62
5 months ago

I would only take ExFat if the HDD is back and forth between different operating systems. With only Windows NTFs is the most powerful.

ntechde
5 months ago
Reply to  norbertk62

Nööööö, Linux, AIX and Solaris read NTFS easily. I don’t think Exfat makes much sense today. Not at all at 3 TB.

norbertk62
5 months ago
Reply to  ntechde

NTFS is Microsoft – can give issues with licenses / copyrights. exFAT is open.

norbertk62
5 months ago

Ext(x) is always an alternative. If you use it in a NAS anyway, the SMB sits at the top or about it – you don’t notice it and it’s still open.

I also know NFS from earlier (Novell), but that would actually be the second choice. You’re well served with SMB – I’d rather.

Theme Huddel with exFAT – can already happen. You have to look at what this is. A file system is derived from the FAT, which can also work in the Tb range. But it is still similar below. Means: this was first built to be able to format MP3 players, cameras, other things without violating copyrights. However, as soon as this is used, for example, in multi-user operation / in the network / multiuser, you get to the limits. Then it’s better to have an ext(x) – that’s much more performant and just made for it.

ntechde
5 months ago

Okay… I’ve never seen that before. This would mean that “small softness” could demand royalties for any formatted HDD!

I generally replace the external panels by NAS with SMB/NFS and so on, which is why it only rarely concerned me. And I have never had problems with NTFS but always had “Huddel” with Exfat.

But now where you say it? I prefer to format the external things with Ext4 🙂

datarescue
5 months ago

If you have an external hard drive Windows 11 use and want to copy large amounts of data like 3TB (I guess you mean total and not 1 file with 3TB?), are the file systems NT1 RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT and ex-FAT the best options.

Here are the advantages and disadvantages of both file systems and some hints that can help you decide:

NTFS (New Technology File System)

Advantages:

  • Optimized for Windows: NTFS is the standard file system for Windows and works particularly well in this operating system.
  • Compatible with large files and volumes: NTFS easily supports large file sizes and volumes, which is ideal for large data volumes.
  • Access rights and security features: NTFS offers advanced security features such as permissions and encryption that exFAT does not offer.

Cons:

  • Compatibility problems: NTFS is not described natively by many other operating systems (e.g. macOS, Linux) – partly only read. If you want to use the hard drive across platforms (e.g. with macOS or smart TVs), NTFS could be problematic.

exFAT (Extended File Allocation Table)

Advantages:

  • Compatibility: exFAT is cross-platform and is recognized by Windows, macOS and many Linux distributions as well as smart TVs and game consoles. This makes exFAT better choice if you want to use the hard drive outside Windows.
  • Supports large files: exFAT can store large files (over 4 GB), which is an advantage over FAT32.

Cons:

  • No extended functions: exFAT does not offer access rights or security features such as NTFS. This could be a disadvantage if you need advanced security features.
  • Performance and reliability: NTFS can often be more reliable and stable for intensive work (e.g. when the hard disk is used as backup or for extensive read/write operations).

Answer to your questions:

  1. Speed: NTFS and exFAT are similarly fast in normal copying and reading operations. A difference will probably hardly be noticeable for your 3TB data.
  2. Recommendation for Windows 11: If you want to use the hard drive with Windows only and value access rights and reliability, NT1 RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT RT the best choice. If the hard drive is also to work on other devices (e.g. macOS, Smart TV), ex-FAT the better option.
ntechde
5 months ago

Take NTFS. You can read this with almost every operating system. Especially when the source plate is formatted in NTFS. (With Exfat, there are a few doofe incompatibilities for file names, but for the details I should also check now.)

Sparrow75
5 months ago

ex-FAT