Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mondragor
2 years ago

Hello,

The arsenic, if it’s in the eggs, has to get there somehow.

The only thing that comes into question is the chicken that laid the egg.

The chicken takes food and converts the usable substances, others accumulate in the body or are excreted. Arsen must have been picked up by the chicken sometime.

And that’s why you can’t answer your question in general. It’s important what the edifying chicken takes. This is likely to vary enormously from chicken to chicken and especially from farm to farm, so no one can say how much arsenic is in a very specific egg.

Mondragor
2 years ago

If the “mother animal”, that is, the chicken has poisons in the body that are incorporated into the egg, that can be, yes. There were also dioxin and other “scandales” as the picture newspaper liked.

The question is how “Bio” or “Freiland” the chickens live. How good or poisonous is the soil on which they live, pick, shy…?

Often there are problems with water supply, soil, feed in industrially managed plants …

The closest the animals live, the less the danger is, therefore, in my opinion.

Freeland does not really mean a qualitatively valuable statement.

BerndBauer3
2 years ago

In some questions, we consider what is meant, why does he ask this question.

You ask: How much arsenic is in eggs? Is arsenic in eggs? Is there more arsenic in eggs than in milk, bread, potatoes? It has nothing to do with free-landing.