How many nanograms would I get?
I had to give a blood test yesterday and now I'm worried about how many ng I'm likely to have.
I've actually smoked weed almost every day for the past week. But what I can say is, I haven't smoked a single joint on my own and always mix it with tobacco. The joints were usually shared between three people, and usually contained 0.3 puffs.
and I've been doing a lot of hotboxing lately, but it was never a really strong hotbox because the room was way too big for that.
sometimes I smoked hash together with cannabis
I know no one can tell me the exact value. But I'm hoping someone can tell me approximately how many nanograms I have in my blood.
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...
You don’t have to worry. The result will be high enough to raise public doubts about your ride.
The actual value used in ng You as much as a pimple on your face. So you should think about a strategy as you deal with the consequences. Strikte abstinence or continue to buff and do not give up driving permission.
What is strict abstinence?
Strikte abstinence is absolute abstinence of cannabis or even “zero consumption”.
Thx for * (2.055)
More than enough for MPU, the limit is at active THC at 1.0ng/ml, but the THC COOH value will break the neck because it shows you are not an occasional box but regular box.
“As a result, regular consumption can be considered as safe for blood samples taken only a few hours after the last consumption, from a THC-COOH concentration of 150 ng/ml. If, on the other hand, the blood sample is taken from the road traffic authority due to the request, regular consumption shall be assumed as soon as a concentration of at least 75 ng/ml THC-COOH in the blood is detected…”
Oh, yes, the values are all in judgment…
Example:
https://openjur.de/u/95628.html
It was a week.
?
Wait for the blood values that decide what the driver’s driving position is doing
I was just thinking about it and it was 1 week where I smoked actively. Before it was only occasional
It is not possible to determine concretely because too many factors play a role. However, it is not unlikely that the value is above the previously mentioned 1.0 ng/ml.
Yeah, I know, but is there anything else except the MPU? Isn’t there any other things I could prove that I’m not addicted or something like that
“Search” is a diagnosis and can only be confirmed or excluded by professionals. In my opinion, the question of suitability is not primarily concerned with addiction, but with the (un)possibility to separate consumption and participation in road transport. That’s what is to be clarified.
I don’t know that far.
Oh, okay. but there are other ways I can do? Or is there the mpu?