Similar Posts
What do stars and planets look like under a very good telescope that really provides good magnification but is also affordable for amateur astronomers?
Bydududidi
Why I ask: Someone showed me images of planets and stars where the stars have a light-like, amorphous, flickering light structure. He says that's what stars actually look like, and that these high-resolution planetary images from NASA are fake, created with CGI (computer-generated images). On the other hand, I think that this amorphous, flickering light…
What happens when the Earth is no longer in the hapitable zone?
Hey, What happens when the sun expands and the Earth is no longer in the haptable zone? What changes?
Which star will the sun merge with?
Byeriboo
From 4.45 min https://youtu.be/JGgm5cZBTsY
What is the best thing to plant?
Hello everyone, I would like to plant something edible in my apartment. I did some research and came up with chard or spinach, but they seem to require quite a bit of space. I'd say 20 to 30 cm between the plants. Now I'm looking for something that can be planted with a maximum of…
Take better pictures with a telescope?
ByBONEz851
I have a Bresser N 150/1400 telescope, and I'd like to take photos through it. What materials do I need to order, and what do I need to consider? Ideally, as inexpensively as possible.
the influence is one of the parameters in the field equations. The best way to understand…
Hubble constant
Assuming a linear extension of the universe, the scale factor a(t)=D(t)/D0 of any distance D and the distance D0 at time t0 in the universe is linearly dependent on time t:
a = da/dt*t (1) with an expansion speed
da/dt = H*a (2)
The factor H is the stroke lead constant (which should be called better stroke lead parameters because it is not constant – in fact follows from a linear expansion constant expansion speed da/dt and thus H=1/t with 1 in 2), has a pole point at the Big Bang and has since then decreased, but never becomes zero.
Cosmological horizon
With the speed of light c it is now possible to define a radius rH=c/H, which is called the stroke lead radius. For D = rH, the speed v(rH) = c, i.e. theoretically, objects are removed at this distance with speed of light from us (the special theory of relativity is only applicable locally and is not violated thereby), and one might think that one can never see these objects because their light does not come against the speed of expansion, but:
1. Light directly behind rH can, once sent out, create with time within rH and ultimately reach us – the correct invoice contains an integration of the movement of co-moved coordinates and the light signal from t0 to infinite and leads here too far – also…
2. the above-mentioned assumption of the linear extension is incorrect. The expansion is subject to braking and accelerating influences (e.g. the mass density including dark matter vs. dark energy), the strength of which was not temporally constant or will be. Depending on these influences, the cosmological horizon can expand further with predominant braking and make more objects visible, or shrink and hide more objects with predominant acceleration.
For these two reasons, the cosmological horizon is not attributable to the hub radius, but at the current level somewhat behind it (about LJ 16 billion instead of LJ 13.4 billion). With further expansion of the universe and decreasing mass density, the acceleration could gain – then the stroke lead parameter would decrease to a constant value: the solution for the differential equation da/dt=const*a is then an exponential extension which finally allowed the cosmological horizon to shrink to structures directly bound by gravity, and the remainders of the association from Milky Way and NGC224 would be alone in the darkness.
Particle horizon.
But where are the farthest objects we already see, really? When their light was emitted, i.e. shortly after the universe became transparent, they were only a few million LJ away. While her light was on the way to us in space, this space moved away from us at the rate of expansion and extended the travel time of the light (and its wavelength) until the light finally arrived here; In the meantime, the objects sent out at that time have become so-called. Particle horizon (about 46 billion LJ), that is far behind the cosmological horizon.
In principle, gravity shapes and structures everything in the universe, although gravity is the weakest of all natural forces. Without gravitation, no galaxies, no galaxies, no star clusters, no stars, no solar system, no planets, etc. Each structure in the universe has been formed only by the gravity of matter. In addition, the gravity also holds all these structures together. In the very young universe, gravity was much stronger as the universe was much smaller than today. So early galaxies could be created and a huge amount of massive stars. Our home galaxy of the Milky Way also emerged far over 13 billion years ago as initially smaller galaxy, which gradually became even smaller due to gravity.
Quite simply, no structures in the universe would have formed without gravitationality. There would be no universe in its present form, nor with it.
Without gravitation, no universe would be.