How do I gender correctly?
(Fictional question with picture without signature):
Where can I find drawings by this cartoonist?
"from this cartoonist " doesn't make any sense,
"by this cartoonist " neither.
"from these cartoonists " doesn't fit,
"from these cartoonists " doesn't fit either.
So how do I gender briefly and concisely?
(5 rating, 5 votes, rated)You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...
Who knows this line and can send me more drawings from the same source?
You see – I love gender… 😎
That's right.
Thank you
I thank you for the star! 😊
In German, there is the wonderful generic, which is completely non-discriminatory and gender-neutral to the activity of a person. The correct sentence is:
" Where can I find drawings by this cartoonist"
Everything else creates unclearness, sexism and discrimination.
Since there are no fixed rules, with starlets, for example:
Where can I find drawings of this*r*m cartoonist*in?
In general, however, I would re-form the sentence so that the opposite component is less important:
Where can I find drawings from the person who drew this cartoon?
This is a good proposal – also for the sake of peace!
"Where do I find drawings from this cartoonist?"
The generic masculine fits everyone.
If this is a female cartoonist, you can also say:
"Where do I find drawings by this cartoonist?"
There should be no confusion here, because it is a specific cartoonist and not a group of different cartoonists. Then it would be easier:
"Where do I find drawings from these cartoonists?"
But I don't know if it's a man or a woman.
The rest serves for completeness.
So I see a PDF with 18 pages. Sure, the study starts with an abstract like almost all studies; then the study itself follows.
I don't understand. Is English now a problem for you or a general problem (think it is) when it comes to a different language like the German?
Where is the "recommended" exactly?
First of all, this is not a study but an abstract, but be it, it is a study summarized. Unfortunately in English, which makes it difficult to read a treatise about the subtleties of the German liquid, but I once overwhelmed it.
And it's what I'm saying. The generic masculine is perceived by many as an explicit masculine. I found nothing about the causes when flying over.
I just don't understand the problem. I didn't say anything else.
This is the latest I know:
https://psyarxiv.com/yjuhc
I'm looking forward to your impression.
I didn't start these studies. You could link one.
However, it can be badly different, because what alternative would you have to offer?
Do these studies? Do you know these studies?
Because these studies relate to the feeling of people, that is logical. And the sensational results from the respective attitude.
When it comes to the attitude of the individual, why do studies show that the generic masculine does not include all sexes equally? 🤔
No, you don't.
Lake.
If someone wants to be excluded from this, that is not your problem, but because of this person's problem. Language does not exclude anyone. People exclude, prefer themselves or they speak deputy and unquestioned for others.
But isn't that incorrect? I'll close the women again.
Quite simply by using generic masculine or generic feminine.
Easy. You don't gender. Problem solved. The available forms, which have been valid in the German language so far, work without new-modic distortions and special characters.
👍👍👍
Not at all.
In the singular this is either a cartoonist or a cartoonist.
You could call both sexes in the plural. I think I will gradually use the generic feminine caricaturists.
Not at all, you can exaggerate it and then you don't have to wonder if you get any answers
AstridThePu