Subscribe
Notify of
5 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peppie85
2 years ago

Yes, and they are definitely deep enough for the foundations to support the weight of the building.

This depends on:

  • Density of the soil
  • Friction coefficient of the soil in relation to the piles
  • Number of posts
  • Distance between the posts.

I once read somewhere that the foundations of old gems like the Empire State Building are usually half as deep as the building's height. But I think, given technological advances, that's no longer state of the art and was probably just a rule of thumb even back then.

Greetings, Anna

pharao1961
2 years ago

There are no international regulations. It also largely depends on the construction of the skyscraper itself and the load-bearing capacity of the subsoil.

Viktor1
2 years ago

The foundation depth has nothing to do with the height. Given suitable soil conditions, these buildings could also be built at ground level, meaning the bottom edge of the foundation equals the ground surface. This is then all a matter of structural calculations, not regulations.

grisu2101
2 years ago

That depends on the surface.
If it is rocky, like in Manhattan, then a few meters are enough.
If it is sandy, a completely different foundation is necessary:
The Burj Khalifa tower rests on a 7,000 m² foundation supported by 200 concrete piles, each 1.5 m in diameter and 50 m deep . The 650 0.9 m diameter pedestal piles for the wings extend 36 m deep. 45,000 m³ of concrete were used for the foundation and floor slab.

Source: Google.de

Clounille
2 years ago

Deep to very deep.