How could public broadcasting be reformed?
(1 rating, 1 votes, rated)You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...
(1 rating, 1 votes, rated)You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...
(1 rating, 1 votes, rated)You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...
reduce to the core order.
1 main station, max. 4 regional stations + 4 regional radio stations with local news events. Main content of education/political education.
Reduced charge to 5€/month
You could, for example, summarize the broadcasters. A clear illustration of the water head would save money.
In addition, it would be a consideration value to leave an independent body on the money guards. Why is it necessary, for example, to buy a format like Mabret Ilner expensive externally, for sums in the 6 digit range instead of producing it yourself?
The crux, however, is that the broadcasters watch over your expenses uncontrolledly, without real account.
It is also possible to take a closer look at the information order. Whether millions of euros have to be spent by the payer only for football fans?
But also, why, for example, each transmission installation has its own carpentry, you can not output scenes as an order, etc.
Possibilities to save money are already there. If you consider this for the main job, the news(inl polita shows reports etc), only 5% is there plenty of air.
This body is already available: https://kef-online.de
Yes, but it works well. So far the good recommended the fee increases every couple of years. The Commission in its form does not have the possibility of prohibiting certain expenditure from a broadcaster. They're laying down what they're supposed to get and that's what they did.