How can you compress a lot of information into one sentence?
(1 votes)
Loading...Similar Posts
Is the poem Sturmnacht a poem in the sense of literary realism?
Based on this, consider: Does Sturmnacht seem to you to be a poem in the sense of literary "realism"? Explain your assessment in two to three sentences.
Why does he have veins on his forehead?
That was a video where he was stuck between a grip, it's called a figure four in wrestling. Are the veins normal on him or is that because the grip is too tight? Or normal, what do you think?
History paper on philosophy?
Hello, I'd like to write a history thesis. However, I'd prefer a philosophical topic. Does anyone have any ideas on how I… Mass psychology manipulation etc …can be limited to a historical research topic? One topic that my teacher has roughly accepted is: How the Stoics changed society in ancient times. However, I think the…
What is your forecast for the economic situation in the pharmaceutical and chemical industry (Germany) in the next 10 years?
Please only serious comments. If you have personal experiences, please share them here Lg
Should you abbreviate your last name with Sch in an interview?
Bysmal1
Hello, I'm currently typing an interview. The last name of the person I interviewed begins with "Sch." I then write X Sch.: “…” Or X S.: “…” Thank you for your answers
Thinking before putting something on paper, leaving everything unimportant.
“Latin” sentences, i.e. bandworm sentences, are not necessarily beneficial. To squeeze too much information into just one set with x attachments, on the one hand, is not a good style, on the other hand that often overwhelms the reader. Even the writer often loses the overview and then brings thoughts into a wrong order. The stupid thing is that he doesn’t realize how he writes.
Most of the best examples of our writing can be found here on a good question in the presentation of problems. There’s no point and comma. Some thoughts are not put to an end, or everything is doubled, and the reader wonders what it is about. It will also be very bad if the writer brings two side-set events one after the other. Then, as a reader, I usually already know that I have to sort for a first time to create a logical order – if there is one at all.
So do more shorter sentences than one (to) long. Avoid two conjunctions consecutively, e.g. …that if … or … because if These sentences go down to 99%. And the most important thing:
Think. before you write something, not first, during you write!
By taking thoughts before, what has to be said and leaving the unimportant. With ancillary approaches, it’s great to put important things to the point.
So rather leave sentences with comma?
You shouldn’t be long forever, otherwise the reading loses the pleasure of reading. But otherwise, sub-sets are quite allowed.
In which they are separated with comma.
Question: Should you do that? Why? The reader – and thus the one who is informed – is then completely overwhelmed. Does that make sense?
Depending on some things, I also sometimes use so much information shortening because you can see some really almost like a math formula.
Leave all unnecessary words