How can you compress a lot of information into one sentence?
(1 votes)
Loading...Similar Posts
Is the Prussian reform a revolution?
ByVenka516
Arguments would be helpful.
When your child talks to you, do you correct his or her sentences to make them gender-conforming?
E.g. "Mom, we need a handyman" Her "No, my child, that means: We need a craftsman or craftswoman" etc. Does this play a role in your upbringing? Or "My child, what did your teachers teach you today?"
History of the word humility?
Bythalia04
I need to invent a word history (how the word "humility" evolved). However, I'm very uncreative, so I'd appreciate any ideas. Greetings:)
What comes in Vera English/Math/German?
I have the eight-grade exams in all three subjects over the next few days (spread over Friday, Monday, and Tuesday). What types of assignments will be in each subject?
Thinking before putting something on paper, leaving everything unimportant.
“Latin” sentences, i.e. bandworm sentences, are not necessarily beneficial. To squeeze too much information into just one set with x attachments, on the one hand, is not a good style, on the other hand that often overwhelms the reader. Even the writer often loses the overview and then brings thoughts into a wrong order. The stupid thing is that he doesn’t realize how he writes.
Most of the best examples of our writing can be found here on a good question in the presentation of problems. There’s no point and comma. Some thoughts are not put to an end, or everything is doubled, and the reader wonders what it is about. It will also be very bad if the writer brings two side-set events one after the other. Then, as a reader, I usually already know that I have to sort for a first time to create a logical order – if there is one at all.
So do more shorter sentences than one (to) long. Avoid two conjunctions consecutively, e.g. …that if … or … because if These sentences go down to 99%. And the most important thing:
Think. before you write something, not first, during you write!
By taking thoughts before, what has to be said and leaving the unimportant. With ancillary approaches, it’s great to put important things to the point.
So rather leave sentences with comma?
You shouldn’t be long forever, otherwise the reading loses the pleasure of reading. But otherwise, sub-sets are quite allowed.
In which they are separated with comma.
Question: Should you do that? Why? The reader – and thus the one who is informed – is then completely overwhelmed. Does that make sense?
Depending on some things, I also sometimes use so much information shortening because you can see some really almost like a math formula.
Leave all unnecessary words