Hilft Vapen gegen Gewicht?

Hallo ich (M/14) und wiege bei einer Größe von 177cm 115kg und meine Frage ist ob es „gut“ ist wenn ich mich mit dem vapen vom Essen ablenke

(3 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
44 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Spiritualsoul5
1 year ago

No way! Smoking is the most untiring thing you can do to your health and above all lungs and if you do not want to wear any damage from it later (which, unfortunately, come with a high degree of probability in regular smoking) then you will rather look for healthy ways to take off. The fact that you take away from smoking is also a myth that is not correct: you take off the more you smoke, but then you take massively again as soon as you restrict smoking and much to smoke should really be a goal with no one to take off, making you break more than well.
Vapes are also more harmful than normal cigarettes.. rather leave your fingers and save your money, what you would spend on cigarettes or Elfbars to get you a diet and fitness coach, because even if it is more laborious to feed and make sports, you will only profit later.

sunnymarie32
1 year ago
Reply to  Spiritualsoul5

Smoking is the most untiring… – Yeah, right…. but what does that have to do with the question of TE?

Spiritualsoul5
1 year ago
Reply to  sunnymarie32

After all, it’s about vapen aka smoking, so in my opinion this has a lot to do with it as well as he even asks if it’s good to take off with smoking.

sunnymarie32
1 year ago

No, it’s not an insult, it’s a fact-finding since you proved yourself that you don’t know the difference between smoke and steam. And you’ve proved your answers with the answers you’ve got problems understanding the reading.

And no – “needs and respectful” maybe not. Why should I also be nice and respectful to you if you are not with the TE and our other readers – after all, you are talking to us with troubled stuff that has nothing to do with the question of the TE and tell us things that are your opinion, but which do not have much to do with knowledge and facts.

Spiritualsoul5
1 year ago

I don’t know if you’re aware of your comment, but “I’m supposed to take physics and chemistry remedial lessons again” and “I have a reading understanding problem and also need remedies” are statements for me that can be called insulting. Nice and respectful this is not expressed in any way, so also does not know who of us here needs help in reading and understanding ♀️

sunnymarie32
1 year ago

Oh, so… it’s already insulting when you tell someone clearly, “you’re injustice, and you don’t know anything about the topic!” ?

  • but I understood the question very well. – No, you don’t know how to find out about this answer.
  • Smoke or steam is relatively no matter – No, it’s not… it doesn’t matter even in the approach! Smoke is the result of a chemical reaction (burning) and steam, which is a physical process
  • because both are harmful – say you… the real life against it shows something else
  • it wouldn’t make a big difference in the damage. – no big difference?! Sorry, but then you should put DRINGEND Maths on your help plan. Because – although overhauled in Wzech, because of 2016 (more recent meta studies show that the difference is even greater), but still internationally recognized – tobacco smoke has a potential for harm by MINDESTENS 95% compared to e-cigarettes…
  • I do not discuss the consequences and effects of smoking here either. – but… you’re already doing this, although it’s not smoking here, as I said.
Spiritualsoul5
1 year ago

Come down from your offensive trip, but I understand the question. Smoke or steam is relatively no matter because both are harmful, so the person can grab tobacco as well and it would not make a big difference in the damage. However, I do not discuss the consequences and effects of smoking here, as this is absolutely not my area of interest. Only and alone is it the health that suffers from it and thus it is in no way good with all drugs such as alcohol, smoking and co. Distract or (as is also the case in the question above) increase this as a means of removing it.

sunnymarie32
1 year ago

No! HERE NOT WHICH and therefore answers to the subject of tobacco smoke have nothing to look for! NOTES! And sorry, but if you don’t manage to distinguish smoke from steam, then you should take remedial lessons in physics and chemistry and learn that smoke and steam 2 are completely different things that NOT have to do with each other!

And again no – the TE did not ask for it, whether it’s good to take off smoking. but “whether it’s “good” when I distract myself from eating“. It would therefore also be recommended to assist in reading.

sunnymarie32
1 year ago

I hope you don’t mean seriously.

Sorry, don’t be angry, but besides that you as a 14-year-old child don’t come to this disposable special waste without committing the other to you crimes, it’s simple and easy to use ABSURD to use e-cigarettes to distract yourself from the dining! Go out, move, play sports and kill your diet – THAT SINN!

Josselchen
1 year ago

No – that doesn’t help at all and is unhealthy.

BIGPOTATOKING
1 year ago

No way. You’re making more trouble with that. Go to a nutritionist or inform yourself. Find a hobby that keeps you from eating sports find something that makes you fun.

Smoking/ Vapen does not help you in any way.

JanJa123
1 year ago

No, definitely not – vape for years… 😉

Stingraylp
1 year ago

Yes and no. Even though nicotine alleviates hunger, it hurts you in the long term just like the overweight. You’re just avoiding your problems.

CBD can also alleviate appetite and is not harmful to health. At least as long as you have no problems with your intraocular pressure (if necessary let the ophthalmologist check it off before) and you don’t take it to you via smoking.

Otherwise I would recommend you to start sports (clearly easier said than done, but no way around it). For example, swimming is a very good way to take off smoothly. Donate also on long-chain sugar, so your blood sugar is more uniform and you get less cravings.

sunnymarie32
1 year ago
Reply to  Stingraylp

How about you just answering themes you know about? You don’t have too much of nicotine.

Stingraylp
1 year ago
Reply to  sunnymarie32

Where’s the problem? I like to corrieve my mistakes.

By the way, you can say something nice, I didn’t do you. 🤷

Stingraylp
1 year ago

You are here on a public internet platform, of course everyone gives their must. That’s completely normal 🤷 if you’re excited to think about whether it’s still fun.

If I told myself where to write nonsense about nicotine, then I would corrieve it!

sunnymarie32
1 year ago

The problem is that you just write UNSINN about nicotine.

And no… you can’t say that nicer slowly – JEDER feels called to add his must, often without any spark of knowledge and at some point it’s just enough.

SturerEsel
1 year ago

No. Turn food, exercise, waiver of junk food, sweets and soft drinks.

A nutritional advice is often available free of charge at your health insurance.

Tell your mother to buy fruit instead of candy.

mth30hg
1 year ago

I don’t think that’s gonna make it worse than you left. Your overweight is already relatively fast out of breath (meaning that Ned insults me) and since a vape yes the lungs function etc worse, your problem would probably only worsen

Haselnuss91
1 year ago
Reply to  mth30hg

Smoking makes the lung function worse. Not the vapen .. on the contrary vapen improves the lung function. Greetings from ex vaper

Stingraylp
1 year ago
Reply to  Haselnuss91

Just read, Vapen leads to inflammation in the lungs in the long term, which is very harmful. Although not as bad as tobacco smoking, it definitely improves lung function not!

mth30hg
1 year ago
Reply to  Haselnuss91

Then you can also say alcohol makes intelligent smoking kills cancer cocaine cures wounds more quickly wonderfully everything clarified supi

Stingraylp
1 year ago
Reply to  Haselnuss91

Bullshit.

mth30hg
1 year ago
Reply to  Haselnuss91

I think that’s less

sunnymarie32
1 year ago

You’re not supposed to. Steam is an RESEARCH PRODUCT for cigarette smokers and an adult drinker and that is allowed and should remain. And as steam around worlds is GESÜNDER as tobacco smoke, it has the potential to save millions of smoke lives worldwide. But this does not work when people who actually have no idea are constantly following the bullshit that the opponents of the E-cigarette want us to turn up. From this – please forgive the answers if you are not sure that you are right:-)

All good for your health – take care of yourself.

Stingraylp
1 year ago

Yeah, I got it. Nevertheless, I will not start steaming, in the event of a doubt, still better for the lungs if you don’t. 🤷

I have enough problems with my health.

sunnymarie32
1 year ago

no plan as reputable these are – not especially… at least not when it comes to steaming. Unfortunately, there is an influential lobby GEGEN the E-cigarette, which for purely financial reasons has no interest in the vaporization and which is immediately followed by those who, for ideological reasons, make a “anti-smoking” apostle and completely hide the E-cigarettes. And if you have “sources” that write down on them, it’s not far off with their credibility… and the bad thing is: people like you who are not dealing with the subject GLAUBEN that because they only hear/read “E-ZIGARETTE” and if it’s a cigarette, then MUST be bad.

Link No. 1 is nothing but a tearful panic thing and I’m saving it from getting closer to it. Only so much: really honest studies with really lively users show something different.

Link 2 – sorry, but this is a mess for a health insurance company that writes such a bullshit. Only of the “d fragrances” listed in the first paragraph, which are supposed to be in liquids, 2 have been banned for years. In Chapter 2 with smoker deconciliation, we continue with the liar: NIEMAND promotes e-cigarettes as a deconciliation agent, because they are not, they are an ERSATZ for tobacco cigarettes, but also function as a deviation aid – even better and more successful in the long term than the products of the pharmaceutical and health industry. And that with the “harmful” – nee… sorry… you fascinately what of “health dangers”, but immediately admit that you “longer-term impacts not yet finalised“… then again the fairy tale of the addictive nicotine and as absolute embarrassment the deaths in the United States that have NOT to do with the consumption of e-cigarettes. These were victims of ILLEGALER DROGEN, who had stretched unscrupulous dealers with a substance that is potentially fatal in inhalation, which the CDC finally admitted in 2020. Oh, yes… the subject of cancer draf is not missing. Cancerogenes can be formed when the glycerol and/or propylene glycol are heated, only DAS does not happen in normal use, but only when the overheating is massive and then the disgusting thing that NIEMAND voluntarily inhales.

And also your last link does into the horn of the e-cigarette opponent with quite thready arguments. But if DA doesn’t wonder at all, after all, the pharmaceutical companies that so far earned themselves with quitting and/or sick smokers a golden nose, until the e-cigarette became an ever more serious competitor, the HAUPT lenders… and “whis bread I eat, the song I sing”… even if the song is very wrong.

Look at this. https://www.doccheck.com/de/detail/videos/5942-e-zigarette-mit-volldampf-voraus

or here: https://www.nonraucherschutz.de/2021/02/17/wem-utilisation-studies-zur-e-zigarette/

And then remember again whether it can really be a product that differs from the ingredients hardly from nicotine spray (the spray contains substances that are prohibited in liquidsARGE and in liquids there are more different flavors) and that is only nebulized differently than the spray, if after all the spray sooo is harmless and harmless, that it can be sold without age restriction, 2 times

Stingraylp
1 year ago

To list the sources from where I had my statement (no plan how serious these are). All in all, you can read that they are not good for the lungs:

Effects on the airways

Among other things, e-cigarettes are harmful because they burden the respiratory tracts: they can cause irritation in the short term and also inflammation of the bronchi cause.

https://www.netdoktor.de/rauchen/e-zigaretten/

In the USA, after the inhalation of steam from electric cigarettes by February 2020, more than 2,800 people had suffered severe pneumonia. Another 68 people died.

https://www.aok.de/pk/magazin/koerper-psyche/sucht/e-zigaretten-wie-schaedlich-sind-sie-real/

“We and other research groups that have examined liquids from the market see significant differences between substances. Some liquids hardly affect the viability of cells, while others observe that, for example, much more cells die. ‘

https://www.apotheken-umschau.de/gesund- bleiben/verdampfen-statt-rauchen-wie-schaedlich-sind-e-zigaretten-949591.html

Stingraylp
1 year ago

Oh, my God, come down first, no reason to get so drunk!

I assumed that hazelnuts meant that steam improves lung function in general. This logically starts from the normal state = non-smoker uThat’s just bullshit!

I also only briefly read on three websites and did not inform me in detail about the sources, etc. So maybe it’s wrong what I’ve read.

Whatever I’d rather stay in smoke or steam.

sunnymarie32
1 year ago

Just read, Vapen leads to inflammation in the lungs in the long term, which is very harmful. You’re still saying there are no long-term studies. How do you want to know that “Vapen leads to inflammation in the lungs in the long term”? Above all: really reputable studies made by people who are also familiar with e-cigarettes – who know how to use them and what to consider – and who have not been bought come to quite different results: not that steam improves the lung function of non-smokers, but that it does very much with smokers and that it has consequences for non-smokers NO NEGATIVES: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-14043-2

sunnymarie32
1 year ago

I don’t think so I’m sorry, but it doesn’t matter what you’re looking for, but what you really are. And there the hazelnut is halfway right: smoking deteriorates the lung function, steam improves them in smokers when they exchange smoke for steam, but with (grown) non-smokers the steam has no influence on the lung function. Your claim “because a vape yes makes the lungs function etc worse” is therefore simple and gripping FALSCH!

Stingraylp
1 year ago

Pain relief ≠ Improvement of lung function! So still wrong.

Haselnuss91
1 year ago

If you’re writing I don’t trust me!? There are also people who don’t hocken the whole time on the Internet 😏

Haselnuss91
1 year ago

My lungs have disappeared pain

blurryeyes22
1 year ago

You better ask yourself that.

Haselnuss91
1 year ago

What are you talking about?

Haselnuss91
1 year ago

With me it was so.

Haselnuss91
1 year ago

Boy! There are also people who do not have all the time to surf the internet 😏

blurryeyes22
1 year ago

Don’t worry.

mth30hg
1 year ago

Now he writes nix more 😶

Perpendikel
1 year ago

Nicotine as an appetite suppressant is not a good choice. You’d better be distracted by moving.

Dreamdrummer
1 year ago

Why do you want to distract yourself from eating? Your 115 kilos with 14 are cool!
If I’d like to have it at the age of 17.

David828
1 year ago

Do sports, feed you healthy etc. The bullshit with the vape hurts your body even more.

Kisam88
1 year ago

if it helps you, then yes.