Do you automatically have a drug problem if you have taken over 40 different drugs – 18yr?

Your problem does not exist in the amount or frequency of your drugs, but in the fact that you necessarily mean to need a drug (no matter what) to upgrade your life.

For you, the world is black or white, isn’t it? The fact that meth immediately depends on coffee and not at all makes you fall under the table.
Do the world you like Pipi Langstrumpf…

You are trying to establish drugs as the social standard. Whoever puts birth on the day is unambiguous not me…

But you’re right in one. Let’s go. I don’t want to discuss it with you anymore, because I don’t own drugs that provide me with the necessary vitality to write on. 😂😂

Your argument is stupid, so what should I look at the leash? If drugs are so great, why don’t you go to kindergarten and sell little Marie a little ecstasy?

What you call collateral damage here has been close friends and relatives for me. Therefore, you shouldn’t be so proud of these ruined lives alone! And Harald Lesch’s views on certain subjects I only know too well. He reports about e-cars, but he also looks critical. He reports historical events and also questions certain decisions critically. On the other hand, you seem to want to blight me here with double semantics that Lesch, just because he reports about something (what his profession is as a moderator!), he would support it.
He definitely doesn’t. Not at all on this issue.

We all took any drugs, but if they belong to everyday life, they’ll destroy life. But in drugs such as meth, which make rapid dependence, you permanently pass over your self-control of a substance that ultimately controls itself. If you don’t think that’s bad, you didn’t even understand the value of a (human) life in the approach.

And two thousand years ago it was completely “normal” people hanging on the cross to see that your wife has just reached the twelfth year of life when she was “ready for marriage” or the punishment for theft resulted in the separation of your limbs.
And now you come with such a mentally totally deviant statement that drugs that have always had a negative impact on humans (independently of whether the temporary feeling feels good) are part of the “history of man”.

Are you still living in a cave, like those people you like to move here as a “parade example”?

There are reasons why many drug addicts die sooner or later in their own cot, on the street OR united. Take the club 27. Amy Winehouse or Kurt Cobain and even outside this club; the “King” Elvis Presley. All of them took drugs and didn’t come down.
So don’t tell me!

And if you’re trying to get me propaganda against the drugs, I can blame you for making propaganda for how it has been propagated in California for decades.

I have lost some of my closest friends in the drugs, and I have seen how they have given up their lives, their profession and their freedoms for a fingertip of coke.

So don’t tell me that drugs are people. This is bullshit!

And concerning the endogenous drugs you mentioned; the body only doses it with important use, but you dose it as a human being completely bad and always in too high amounts. That’s why drugs need regulations that the box like you do not want to allow.

We live in 21. century not in the Middle Ages and not in ancient times. Just stay here and now.

So taking drugs is quite normal? Think about this.
Drugs are not taken if you are satisfied with your life. You always take them if you don’t feel understood when you want to escape reality or because you have to cope with some kind of frustration.

I have seen more than enough people throw their lives on board because they had problems with their partners, their jobs or their families. So please don’t come with trolls or shit. If you don’t have anything to do, just don’t come.

I suppose you’re not a researcher or a student in this field. Don’t you just overestimate your potential to commit one opinion to the other about all drugs?

Be honest with us. Why are you taking drugs? What threw you out of the train? Divorced parents? Reliability? Wasted love? What was it?

Well, you write, “Why should I just stay sober for 3-4 months. I don’t have to prove anything to anyone,” I understand your point of view. But if you reverse the meaning of your statement, you can ask yourself the following question: “Why do I have to take drugs? What do I want to prove to MIR?”

Well, I know that drugs, in addition to stimulating substances, also have harmful substances. And I know that drugs are not cheap and not easy to get. And then they have them, usually they say, hide until they are consumed. Because if you get caught, there can even be a prison sentence (in the worst case).

So I’m cautious and ask the question that has already been referred to again: “Why do you take drugs? What are you trying to prove?