Hat der Extrem-Kapitalismus die Nahrungsmittel positiv verändert?
Egal wohin man in den Geschäften schaut, egal ob Süßigkeiten oder irgendwelche Tiefkühlprodukte, überall wird gestreckt und möglichst billig produziert.
Schnitzel bekommt eine Flüssiggewürzspritzung, Käse wird mit Butter gestreckt und mit Natriumphosphat genießbar gemacht, Teig wird mit Dextrose beschleunigt, Nudelsuppen werden mit Glutamat genießbar gemacht, Fleisch wird mit Natron aufgelöst usw.
Der Kapitalismus hat dazu geführt, dass man statt einfach ehrlich vernünftige Ware zu Marktpreisen anzubieten, aus echten und angepriesenen Produkten, minimal verarbeitet, Produkte erzeugt, die ziemlich ungesund sind und mit fabrikgerechten Zuschlagstoffen die gerade noch legal sind die Produkte so günstig wie möglich herzustellen.
Das hat genau einen Vorteil, die Gewinnmarge solcher Lebensmittelunternehmen ins Unermessliche zu steigern, der Leidtragende, der Konsument, der komplett veräppelt wird und sich eventuell über chronische Erkrankungen freuen darf, die er nicht lokalisieren kann.
Ich würde mir wünschen, wenn die Produkte ganz genau nur das aufgedruckt bekommen dürften, was da auch wirklich drin ist. Also statt Pizzakäse steht dann da Natriumphosphat, Salz, Butter, Natriumcitrat, Süßmolkepulver usw. Mischung mit 10% Käse oder so.
Wüsstet ihr, inwiefern man die Unternehmen dazu motivieren kann, gesündere Lebensmittel zu produzieren?
(3 votes)
Loading...
Sorry, but total nonsense.
You are self-debted when you buy ready food with ten million ingredients.
It is not evil capitalism, it is the stupid people who buy pizzas, chips and rubber bears.
Every supermarket has everything you need for a healthy diet. Fruit, vegetables, nuts, meat, fish, rice, noodles, bread.
Everyone is responsible for his diet. Not evil capitalism. If you buy garbage, you get garbage.
By the way, evil capitalism has ensured that much more people can afford higher-quality food. The offer is much bigger and cheaper.
People who are misled by advertising tricks and false claims and who are lied to knit and thread are never blamed themselves.
And without capitalism, there would not be the word “bar” at all.
Well, I’ve been through the ad tricks and false charges, and I’m certainly not Albert Einstein.
Most people just don’t deal with their diet. All information is available free of charge.
And without capitalism, there would be neither the phone on which I write this comment, nor the apartment in which I find myself, nor heating, car, bus, internet, and so on and so on.
Thanks to capitalism, humanity is as good as never before. Unlimited capitalism is bad, so the social market economy is also right.
This fashion of hating capitalism is bullshit.
Everyone is responsible for his own safety, everyone is responsible for his fires, everyone is responsible for his operations, his emergency aid itself, everyone is responsible for his own right…
With so much egoism and so much thought about a self, what then even a society? If you should do everything yourself instead of committing everyone to do what he can best.
This consideration is probably the cornerstone of capitalism, boundless socialism, to consider society as a prey, rather than as a federal construct of mutual support. With such a thought, the potential happiness for all will probably remain with the few forever.
Yeah, it’s up to a certain degree. Anyone who goes to bed with a burning cigarette, asleep and thus creates a fire cannot blame evil capitalism for its stupidity.
Yeah, it’s up to a certain degree. Anyone who jumps his house from the second floor instead of using the stairs cannot blame evil capitalism for having to operate now
Yeah, it’s up to a certain degree. Whoever strikes the neighbor because he annoys him cannot blame evil capitalism for having to go to jail.
Own responsibility has nothing to do with capitalism.
But that’s been known for a long time. We are buying all these processed foods. You can do a lot of what you buy yourself if we weren’t so lazy.
Food with take from home and produce yourself. Making noodles and bread is not a witchcraft, but we are just too comfortable to grab in the shop and then complain about the manufacturers that we buy it and eat or drink
The thing is, the products are not unhealthy because they fulfill the practical properties, but because they achieve these properties cheapest substances. This is the problem of capitalism.
No, the main problem in capitalism is consumers. It’s us. 100 years ago zb it was completely normal to prepare and take his proviant for lunch or breakfast at home. Today we prefer to buy something at the snack or Starbucks. Although it would not be necessary. We just like it as comfortable as possible.
Consider the importance: Market volume and sales growth then we can discuss further
Oh, man, how many times should I go into this. Either you understand my answer or not. If you don’t understand simple market economic terms, then there’s no value to discuss anything with you.
There is nix of German production and German companies…beyond meat is an American company..
is it really so difficult to read that the total turnover of German products in private households the German companies have sold? And not the sale of restaurants, mensas and other companies included?
Although this is clear and clear.
But
There is no “private households in Germany” and now please no longer annoy me. I’ll write this for the 6th time. Argumentate market economy or just leave it.
No,
You don’t understand. It’s black on white…
How many more? These are meat substitute products produced by German companies in Germany.
No, you don’t understand German market economy.
But
Stands in the headline.
No he bought a b2c product because he did not buy at the manufacturer in Germany but at the local supermarket.
Manufacturers do not sell to individuals
https://www.ruegenwalder.de/produkte/vegane-muehlen-rostbratwuerstchen
Which country produces the product is no matter what it is about sales by individuals. So what the consumer puts in the shopping trolley in the supermarket and thus goes through the checkout.
There is still no mention of the households in Germany.
when an Italian goes to Lidl in Italy and buys a meat substitute product. He bought a German product. That’s it
Therefore, data only
To make it meaningful.
In Germany, we still measure according to the gross domestic product and not Buissnes To buissnes business.
This includes, of course, what companies generate in the expansion
Germany sells garnix. Company sell products
B2C therefore Business to consumer does not include B2B so business to business business which would be export.
Yes, and Germany not only sells to households in Germany as little sold only Italy to households in Italy
Stands in the text that it is not.
So this is about the sale in the domestic of the export got out.
This is about total sales of German and Italian companies worldwide and not about what Germans or Italians consume. Please read sources in the future before you argue with them.
When you look at the sales of the chemical building boxes:
Germany
https://de.statista.com/outlook/cmo/food/meat/meat substitute products/germany
Italy
https://de.statista.com/outlook/cmo/food/meat/meat products/italy
Dear Germans more… and are easier to manipulate from the food industry…
Lidl and Aldi are also available in Italy 😂 and not very few branches
Clearly cheap and no matter what quality
But of course we also have a food culture in Germany. However, it is not possible to compare some food culture with that of Italy.
Even if spaggetti and noodles are not an invention from Italy
Right, e.g. in Italy, there’s nowhere in any small shop and even in the country a coffee winner machine with the best coffee. We fill up with cheap Nescafé from the cuddly taste. The problem in Germany, like, have no food culture but a culture without quality.
It is even worse: the LowCarb movement of the meat industry may soon destroy everything good and healthy.
You just have to look at the production of agricultural plants
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZXGHspYW9E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt9AOCCX1KY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9IA02SQcgU
https://www.tierversuche.bayer.de/de/tierversuche-fuer- Pflanzenschutzmittel.aspx
https://ethikguide.org/infothek/tierversuche-das-tun-wir-ihnen-an/
http://www.aerztefuertierschutz.ch/index.html?id=40
http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/natur/landwirtschaft-pestizide-verringenern-artendiversity-in-gewaessern-a-906263.html
http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/palmoel-regenwald-sparen-fuer-den-supermarkt-1.1457107
http://www.dlr.rlp.de/Internet/global/themes.nsf/0/D58A32E6A3826437C1257727004728C8?OpenDocument
https://www.ugb.de/forschungsstudies/hohe-environment-environment-environment transports/
The enjoyment of plants thus brings the painful poisoning and fragmentation of billions of animals, predatory farming, extermination of whole species by monocultures, the destruction of food, the waste of water by low-nutrients plants, fine dust by mass import/export, greenhouse gases that worsen climate change, rainforest destruction due to southern fruits and palm oil, soy oil, water poisoning due to massive pesticide use and art th…
This is exactly what the legislator wants to ban established and generally known terms such as “Burger”, “Wurst” and “Steak” for plant products.
And on the other hand, associations such as proveg Sturm, start petitions and want to partout that the industry can call all the produtes “Wurst”, “Fleisch”, “Yoghurt” etc.
If you want to print only what is really in there in a product, I have a good message for you: there is the requirement in DE that a list of ingredients must be printed on all food packaging offered in DE.
By buying only the foods that are healthy.
Alex
And how should I do that if I am consistently lying when shopping and the list of ingredients doesn’t tell me what A is healthy, B is in what quantity in it and C was exactly and intensively the processing step.
Of course not. Because a single food is never healthy or unhealthy. Only the Total a diet. If you all required nutrients sufficient and not too much, your diet is healthy – no matter which product you eat.
The task of the ingredients list is also not to teach you healthy nutrition. But you can http://www.naehrwertrechner.de enter what you eat and then figure out how many nutrients you have got.
no answer is true.
Of course, all the finished dishes, snacks, frozen pizzas, fruitjogurts are superfluous and unhealthy. The customer is lazy and doesn’t want to cook himself, but just put something in the microwave.
But not all customers, many also buy “normal” fresh and healthy goods. These are also products of agriculture, which has made it possible by modern agar technology, fertiliser chemistry etc to feed 8 billion people on the planet.
So if everything has 2 pages, and if I want to buy healthy, this is not even more expensive than the finished food with preservatives, flavor enhancers, thickeners, color etc… and as cheap as possible ingredients such as palm oil, separator meat, rotten fruits that can no longer be sold otherwise.
are they really?
If you were to eat the rest of your life only frozen pizza, you would live longer than if you were to eat the rest of your life only carrots.
So what is healthier – frozen pizza or carrots?
The correct answer is: A single food is never healthy or unhealthy. Only the Total a diet. If you all required nutrients sufficient and not too much to eat, your diet is healthy – whether you eat or not ready meals, snacks, frozen pizzas and fruit jogurts.
DE does not have the task of feeding 8 billion people, DE should only care for its own population, that this is not really the case, of course you also notice. Nonetheless, you can produce healthy and still supply all with abundant food. But this is not the goal of the enterprise, which wants to have a lot of money, no matter how, the population is the suffering.