Is Chat GPT right?
I would have said 42
(1 votes)
Loading...Similar Posts
Web animation and process visualization?
ByAlephSam
I need help with a project that involves graphically displaying states (see the attached image). The idea is that when states and variables change in JavaScript, this should be represented graphically. So far, I've done it so that there's an image for every possible state. The problem is, as the system expands, the creation of…
Does it still make sense for artists to make real music? Spotify with a bunch of fake AI songs?
Hey I'm really sad that fake artists who have AI songs with cheap quality have more views For example https://open.spotify.com/artist/6QklMjzs3U4b4s32c6vGnM?si=hMegzZxURiKy4X4ZL1bEeg I'm really disappointed at the moment Real artists get paid the same so sad I am a DJ, artist, producer and also work with other artists. We put a lot of work into it and…
How to open Pycharm?
I downloaded Pycharm following a tutorial, and everything worked fine so far. However, I want to open the Pycharm file, but everything I try just wants to download it again, even though I already have it installed. Does anyone have any ideas, experience, or knowledge?
Use WhatsApp in China?
Can you access WhatsApp in China? Can you even open the app? The app has been blocked since September 2017 and I'm wondering if my friends can write to me but I can't reply or if I can't open the app at all. Thanks in advance 🙂
Starting a career in my current situation is very difficult, what should I do?
ByJrDev
Hello everyone, I hope you're doing well 🙂 I have a burning question for experienced IT professionals. Perhaps an IT professional can give me some guidance or tips to make me more attractive on the job market? A brief overview of my career: Shortly before the coronavirus pandemic began, I lost my job as a…
42 is right.
Please do not use LLM for mathematics….
LLMs and Maths don’t work. For this, there’s a lot of computer on the Internet.
chatgpt and other LLMs should be used exclusively for text or programming and similar. Not for scientific, facts or mathematics. This tool has not been developed. This then works as well as a screw with nem hammer to hit the wall.
Can work and hold, but it doesn’t have to.
“The master marvels and can’t glau’m, you can also screw with a hammer.” :
What happened after 10 months 😉
?
LLMs still can’t have a math. And that’ll be the same. It doesn’t make any sense to use LLMs for math…
In Mathe, you don’t need to predict the next token but logical sequences. Where are logical sequences? With normal code. This is why chatgpt also uses a kind of “cocket computer addon”. To teach an LLM math would run like this:
What is 1+1?
13
No, 2… What is 1+2?
2
On the basis of the learned, an LLM estimates which token (so simply said word) could come next. Therefore, with smaller LLMs (4b and smaller) there are no reasonable high-quality sentences. You can’t really appreciate it.
You can also take your autocorrection on your phone and often tap the left word. This is exactly what makes an LLM, only that the suggestions are better than that of auto correction.
And why can o3 (and o1) suddenly math and logic, what you just explained, what does not work?
-> For test time computing. Here, “think” the models before they respond. This is the difference to 3.5, 4 and 4o (at ChatGPT). The model has a buffer between question and answer that allows a thinking process. He starts to generate similar problems (Chain of thought (-Prompting).
This principle already uses o1, which is why it is much better in math etc. At o3, the principle was greatly optimized. Now o3 is really a mathematics, physics and coding expert.
Please inform yourself before you spread your outdated (Fehl) information:)
https://www.faz.net/pro/digitalwirtschaft/kuenstliche-intelligenz/liveticker-zu-12-days-of-open-ai-sam-altman-stell-open-ais-neues-sprachmodell-o3-vor-faz-110155698.html
I think o3 will have its price, but LLM is LLM. The LLMs are not only better, but also more efficient with time. This is to wait, but as I said – LLM is LLM and this one reaches more than you thought. Is on PhD levels -> Also in Math!
Your information has long been outdated.
Trying o1? Ever heard of o3?
Then go to Google and research. Especially to o3 times please look!
https://www.golem.de/news/argumentationsfaehigkeiten-openai-stellung-neue-chatgpt-modellfamilie-o3-vor-2412-191924.html
o3 solves math problems for which professional math experts need hours or even weeks.
So, the time has changed and LLMs have reached the point where they master mathematics, physics and coding better than humans. o3 can also solve logic tasks.
42 is right.
A proof that you can’t trust in all the AI.
52 = 5 x 8^1 + 2 x 8^0 = 40 + 2 = 42.
ChatGPT is a Language model.It cannot count independently. Therefore it should not be trusted in mathematical results without a counter sample
ok still ne fast ask, then I don’t have to put an extra: determine the value range of the 10 bit 2er complement. I know that the value range of the 8 bit 2 supplement goes from -128 to 127, at 2 high 9 maybe from -256 to 255 and at 2 high 10 from -512 to 511 or?
That’s it.
you can look at my latest question, it’s about switching
42 is correct, and this is a great example of how good GTP broadcasts. language and structure so well constructed that you could believe it… and that is also the task of GPT (not computing)
No, it’s not right, but it’s not good at that.
42 is correct. Fun Fact: 42 Should the answer be on everything, according to any source
there was another question, they count 22 out of the decimal system into the quinary system, came 42 out
I’m getting to 52
What is the quinary system
Joshua
Ahso.. I put 5high2 roof right at the second 12
with basic five, 5 high 0 and 5 high 1 we only need because yes 5high 2 shcon is above the 22 so I have 4 times 5 high 1 and 2 times 5 high 0