So so; so the hotline in question is predestined exclusively for that group of people who claim the monopoly on problem definition, while those who suffer from problemlessness [which is a problem for those affected] are supposed to remain helpless [???].
I'll probably delete your post right away ^^ But you're right. Life would be so wonderful if everyone showed a little more consideration for one another.
The helpline is for people who are experiencing violence at home, are suicidal or are in serious life crises and not for those who are "problem-free".
What you ultimately do is none of my business, but remember that you are taking away the chance of help from people who really have a problem, which brings us back to the point of empathy, you bastard!
I couldn't immediately think of the term for this "illness." It's called "boreout," and it can be a real problem for people with managerial talent and a passion for creating and working.
In a spirit of patient love, I didn't stigmatize the less educated for their insults in support, even though they're already completely overwhelmed by the topic and failing to address the problem of having a problem. I'm a humanist, after all. You, on the other hand, are to be commended.
Boreout, you're right, is a massive UNDESIRABLE stress that leads to problems if you're extremely resilient. Well identified. It's all the more incomprehensible why so many people in the forum trivialize this problem.
Burnout syndrome is a condition based on a lack of motivation, either self-inflicted or through excessive demands, that is essentially rooted in a lack of energy. This is well known. But logically, it cannot be attributed to a problem-free zone—quite the opposite.
…please don't slide onto the parade track of scheduled public transport departure times in order to catch the very last wave of supposed correctness. On the one hand, such an effort misses the point, and further, such an inappropriate statement is inappropriate.
Hm…. the meaning of life is to be in a situation from which you can derive a problem in order to channel this – right (?)… it then logically follows that problem-free zones are pointless and meaninglessness is just as logically a problem – or (?)… so how can a problem-free zone not be a problem (?)..The question is certainly justified when you consider how much suffering a life without problems can cause… from a parity perspective and strictly speaking, those without problems also need help because they meet the demands of pastoral care in a certain sense… or are those without cares now being discriminated against (?).
Have I understood that correctly… someone who doesn't have any problems should enter into a partnership in order to be able to take part in a specific problem area?!
No—I would never do that either. It would block the line for people who really need help.
It's like making prank calls to the emergency number. It can cost lives.
So so; so the hotline in question is predestined exclusively for that group of people who claim the monopoly on problem definition, while those who suffer from problemlessness [which is a problem for those affected] are supposed to remain helpless [???].
I'm slowly getting the feeling that this whole thing is just a provocation
I think he's just bored and lonely XD I'm only writing here in case others see this – awareness ^^
How right you are, but some of the intelligence-allergic people here don't seem to understand that.
I'll probably delete your post right away ^^ But you're right. Life would be so wonderful if everyone showed a little more consideration for one another.
The hotline is not for fun, and this ****** also deleted my comments.
Here is an info for @NoviosatioN
The helpline is for people who are experiencing violence at home, are suicidal or are in serious life crises and not for those who are "problem-free".
What you ultimately do is none of my business, but remember that you are taking away the chance of help from people who really have a problem, which brings us back to the point of empathy, you bastard!
Probably – my previous comment was deleted ^^
I still believe that this hotline should not be used for fun.
I've never done it before, but I've noticed for myself how "empty" it feels when everything just flows along smoothly.
It somehow feels more alive when there are problems to solve.
Well deserved like. ☝🏻.
I couldn't immediately think of the term for this "illness." It's called "boreout," and it can be a real problem for people with managerial talent and a passion for creating and working.
However, since some people feel called upon to resort to bullying, I consider it necessary to put a stop to such behavior.
In a spirit of patient love, I didn't stigmatize the less educated for their insults in support, even though they're already completely overwhelmed by the topic and failing to address the problem of having a problem. I'm a humanist, after all. You, on the other hand, are to be commended.
Boreout, you're right, is a massive UNDESIRABLE stress that leads to problems if you're extremely resilient. Well identified. It's all the more incomprehensible why so many people in the forum trivialize this problem.
I wrote BOREOUT – the opposite of burnout.
Burnout syndrome is a condition based on a lack of motivation, either self-inflicted or through excessive demands, that is essentially rooted in a lack of energy. This is well known. But logically, it cannot be attributed to a problem-free zone—quite the opposite.
No, how nonsensical
That's very discriminatory. There are people who suffer from a lack of problems—that's actually possible.
The term "problem-free" is somehow misleading. It essentially lacks the meaning of life.
…please don't slide onto the parade track of scheduled public transport departure times in order to catch the very last wave of supposed correctness. On the one hand, such an effort misses the point, and further, such an inappropriate statement is inappropriate.
Hm…. the meaning of life is to be in a situation from which you can derive a problem in order to channel this – right (?)… it then logically follows that problem-free zones are pointless and meaninglessness is just as logically a problem – or (?)… so how can a problem-free zone not be a problem (?)..The question is certainly justified when you consider how much suffering a life without problems can cause… from a parity perspective and strictly speaking, those without problems also need help because they meet the demands of pastoral care in a certain sense… or are those without cares now being discriminated against (?).
Have I understood that correctly… someone who doesn't have any problems should enter into a partnership in order to be able to take part in a specific problem area?!
But the meaning of life is not to have problems 💀
Then you have to find a partner, hobbies, travel the world, or something else. And if that doesn't work, it's time for therapy, I'd say.