Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
siliciumcarbid3
11 months ago

The idea was cool and that it was tested properly, I also find it good. This is simply associated with high costs.

In Germany I would not like to take this back at the current time. The size underesland does not really justify such a high-speed network. Because with the current technologies inmerhin would be approx. 300km/h no problem at all. Therefore, I would invest in normal rail expansion, as there is a lot of potential in Germany at the low performance level.

Apart from advantages, a transrapid would also have some disadvantages. Also money, but also incompatibility to the normal track network. You would also have to build new stations or expand current stations in a complicated manner.

I simply do not see the competencies in Germany as expensive construction projects are implemented extremely tough. And first we need a stable public transport network before we can even think about a premium extension like a transrapid.

verreisterNutzer
11 months ago

If you tell me where the petition is, I’d like to look at it.

verreisterNutzer
11 months ago
Reply to  Simulat123

Thank you. 🙂

Lamarama488
11 months ago

No. What should be a transrapid

Schimeck
11 months ago

If you don’t need a man, our rail network must first be brought to the forefront. Goods don’t drive with the transrapid.

jule2204
11 months ago

Where I live there was no petition. And there’s no magnetic float.

Kleidchen2
11 months ago

The railway can be used exoticly and is unsuitable for solving the current traffic problems.

Kleidchen2
11 months ago
Reply to  Simulat123

This is complaint without practical reference to reality in Germany.

nobodyathome
11 months ago

Transrapid is bullshit for Germany