Haben wir bald eine Super KI?

Der CEO von OpenAI behauptet, dass der Fortschritt im Bereich der Künstlichen Intelligenz exponentiell ist und er glaubt, dass wir schon in 10-15 Jahren eine agi haben werden, der jeden kognitiven Job der Welt machen könnte.

Ich bin Software Entwickler in einer Bank und habe so eine Angst, dass ich dann arbeitslos sein werde. Meint ihr er übertreibt oder denkt ihr, dass es realistisch ist?

Ich dachte eigentlich, dass ich als Programmierer in die Rente gehe, aber irgendwie sieht es so aus, dass es echt unrealistisch ist, weil KI’s jetzt schon sehr gut programmieren.

Was ist eure Einschätzung?

(2 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bushmills145
1 year ago

Automation has so far been based on relocation, changes in occupations, and higher efficiency and greater productivity.

Should the profession of the software developer change by using AI, then the use of AI is more involved in its activity than before, but not the need for all software developers.

AI is a tool similar to an electric hair cutter is a tool for hairdressers – and these were not unemployed by such tools.

Traveller5712
1 year ago

Yeah, there’ll be a super-KI soon. In my view, this depends entirely on the degree of networking of the currently existing AI applications.

Of course, the CEO is right. Not only the AI research progresses exponentially – but the entire technology. I’m surprised that you as a programmer are not familiar with the Moore’s law. If that’s the case, I would definitely recommend that you deal with it.

And how good ChatGPT seems to be able to write code, this AI appears to prove it again every day.

Do it Just familiar with the idea that you will no longer develop applications in less than 10 years, but will at best design them.

Lamanini
1 year ago
Reply to  Traveller5712

I’m surprised that you as a programmer are not familiar with the Moore’s law

This has nothing to do with it and is no longer true today.

Traveller5712
1 year ago
Reply to  Lamanini

Of course, this has something to do with it and the law is neither obsolete nor has it lost its validity.

Lamanini
1 year ago

I mean, the guy himself just said that you shouldn’t interpret it as you say, but I’m sure you’re smarter, and so I’m also entitled to start others on the internet.

Traveller5712
1 year ago

Well, if you think you’ll be right. Have fun still in life.

Lamanini
1 year ago

Then you have to know a way to build transistors from less than one atom. Krass.

If you’re looking at others and writing something like that, at least look at what you’re writing wrong…

ForumLibhaber
1 year ago

In 10 – 15 years

73MissMaple
1 year ago

I work in software development myself and have played ChatGPT for fun.

The code that he wrote to me was absolutely unusable, sometimes even wrong. And it wasn’t about complex problems but simple foundations. There are many solutions on the Internet, but ChatGPT solutions have never been used. So I’m not worried about my job.

73MissMaple
1 year ago
Reply to  konanrri129qw

clear, but as I said: absolutely unusable for programming. ChatGPT is still far from human intelligence.

alaskamusher
1 year ago

“bald” is relative! Can also be in 200 years!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBAiF0MLaBg

crimsonfire
1 year ago

Can I introduce myself in 15-20 years

fuechs
1 year ago

No, AI is still quite stupid and seems to reach its limits so slowly.

HoiZusammen
1 year ago

No, we can’t do that at this time. We didn’t have much knowledge in this area. – progress is much more in speed than in knowledge gain.