Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
23 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Perpendikel
2 years ago

This is the result of a Studyin which it is expressly stressed:

“A limitation of our study is that correlation is not equivalent to causality, as our data does not investigate possible causes for the hesitant vaccination or risky driving. One possibility is the distrust to the government or the belief in freedom that contributes both to impotence and to increased traffic risks. Another explanation could be false ideas of everyday risks, belief in natural protection, a dislike against regulations, chronic poverty, misinformation, inadequate resources or other personal beliefs. The alternative factors could include political identity, negative experiences in the past, limited health competence or social networks that lead to reservations about public health policies. These subjective unknowns remain themes for further investigations.”

Krabat693
2 years ago

Correlation and causality.

Blacksmile167
2 years ago

Rarely read such a bullshit:D

I’m still unvaccinated and haven’t had an accident yet. *3x knock on wood*

My brother, on the other hand, is even boostered and had a serious traffic accident this year.

So the biggest bullshit I’ve ever read.

Perpendikel
2 years ago
Reply to  Blacksmile167

So the biggest bullshit I’ve ever read.

Reading alone is not enough, you also have to understand;)

Mugua
2 years ago

There’s probably someone who can’t keep correlation and causality apart.

Rolajamo
2 years ago
Reply to  Mugua

And why should it be bullshit?

Biergehtrein
2 years ago

Journos at the limit again.

Rolajamo
2 years ago

A look into the study itself and the secret is ventilated.

How has already written:
Correlation and causality are two different things.

DaKaBo
2 years ago

Typical.

You should read the texts completely and not just the title.

In the texts it is stressed that there is not a causality here per se, but only a correlation. A possible causality is only speculated.

That’s all.

Jekanadar
2 years ago

Runs in about the same rail as the statement “People who like to eat ice will become more frequent victims of robberies”.

Yeah, the comparison is going down, something, but I think the direction is clear.

bluebird5
2 years ago
Reply to  Jekanadar

The danger of drowning in a swimming pool is in the years at the highest in which Nicolas Cage publishes many films. Is statistically detectable.

http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations

;

Jekanadar
2 years ago
Reply to  bluebird5

I love statistics. Take anything and put it in relation to each other… Many good stories have emerged from this.

Gummipunkt
2 years ago

And even if there was a correlation, this would not prove causality for a long time.

Internus
2 years ago

That’s what Bias says

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago

Rarely laughed.

zalto
2 years ago

How nice to have found a vaccine against car accidents now!
Do I get a discount with my vaccination pass?

Rolajamo
2 years ago
Reply to  zalto

As an expert, I would have expected more of you

zalto
2 years ago
Reply to  Rolajamo

The true “experts” are the ones that embody such articles. I only keep their thoughts consistent.

Rolajamo
2 years ago

In the case of such answers, one keeps remembering:D

Rolajamo
2 years ago

Reading the headline is not enough;)

MovieJunkie25
2 years ago

That makes absolutely no sense!

Do you really believe such a scam?