Gilt geringer Abstand als A oder B Verstoß?
Guten Tag,
Ich hatte auf dem Weg in den Urlaub ein Auffahrunfall. Das Ding ist ich habe den Abstand eingehalten und als die Person vor mir stark abgebremst hat war ich kurz in Schock und hab leider spät abgebremst und bin reingefahren.
Mir wurde gesagt das auch wenn ich es so Aussage bei der Polizei sie mir die Schuld geben werden, was ich nicht gerecht finde. Ich weiß nicht inwieweit das stimmt aber deswegen frage ich hier.
Wenn sie mir jetzt die Schuld geben und sagen ich habe den Abstand nicht gehalten unter welchen Verstoß zählt das? Ich bin auf mein Führerschein angewiesen, weil ich schon ein im Voraus geplantes Vorstellungsgespräch bei DHL habe für ein Job als Paketzusteller aber habe schon meine Probezeit verlängert bekommen und 1 Monat Fahrverbot weil ich mich von Freunden beeinflusst lassen habe und zu schnell gefahren bin. Was vielleicht noch wichtig sein könnte ist, dass nichts gemessen wurde nur vor ort bei der aufnahme oder geprüft ob es stimmt nur aussagen aufgenommen worden sind und die ganze zeit so geredet wurde das ich den abstand nicht eingehalten habe als wäre es selbstverständlich und es ne tatsache ist.
Ich hoffe ihr könnt mir helfen
(1 votes)
Loading...
If you’re up, you haven’t met enough security distance. Now it depends, the front man has braked or not due to traffic. In the first case, the sole debt meets you, in the second case at least a partial debt
Well, that is, in principle, the distance must be maintained such that one has to stand behind the vehicle driving ahead, even if it is suddenly braked. (see §4 StVO)7
If you’re in shock, and that’s why you’re gonna need a reaction forever, the distance must be bigger…
The violation here also goes according to §4 StVO (Ie, as a result of too little distance, on the decelerated Farzeug. It came to the accident) but the whole remains in the warning area with 35€
No points…
Your driving tire leaves a lot to be desired for a professional driver, I would think about DHL again.
Otherwise: If you have a fault, you can prove that the leading outside of closed villages has braked groundlessly and you could not escape or slow down in time, the fault can also pass to the other driver. If you can’t do that, you’ll be guilty. You don’t get points for this, because it’s not possible to prove whether the complaint was complied with.
I understand that the debt is given to 95%, but it’s an a or b repulsed. I’m ripe and I’m sure I’m just stopping at the beginning of how unfortunately many young people have influenced me by friends and pressed. This has been happening for a year more and I haven’t done anything since. So this falls under the b or under what does it fall?
I’d rather not ride around at your place with the police so that you were “in shock” and therefore took longer to react. This could cause doubts about your ride.
Better be that the front man has braked suddenly and without visible reason, and you have kept too small a distance for that.
The classification and presumed punishment was already mentioned to you.
The distance must be so large that even in the case of a full braking of the pilot, one can still stop in time. For this purpose, a certain reaction time is also included in the calculation of the stopping path in order to take into account this short shock moment. Therefore, in almost all incidents, the principle of “who has to blame” applies.
Distance distortions in which the distance is less than “half tacho” and which are measured with special measuring devices are A violations.
In your case, however, only the accusation of the ascent can be made for too small a distance without really being able to name the distance. This is then merely a warning money and has no sampling time sequences.
35 €
Distance violations are A violations.
In the extended sample period:
No driving ban, but written warning.
At the next A violation, the driver’s license and the blocking period of at least six months will be withdrawn.
I’ve already kicked one a, that’s my second. Or is the withdrawal only at the third a? I couldn’t read that out of your message. Dsnke
Third.
A violation of 35€ warning money is not an A violation.
A distance violation is always an A violation.
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/fev_2010/anlage_12.html
§ 2a Abs. 2 StVG
§ 28 Abs. 3 Nr. 3 Buchstabe a StVG
Im Fahreignungsregister werden Daten gespeichert über
35€ < 60€. Der Verstoß wird also nicht ins Fahreignungsregister eingetragen und hat daher auch keine Probezeitrelevanz (weder A- noch B-Verstoß)
In § 28 Abs. 3 Nr. 1 geht es um Straftaten und in Nr. 3c um Gefahrgut, also hier nicht relevant.
Du kannst auch um Tatbestandskatalog unter Tatbestandsnummer 104106 nachlesen, dass dort in der Spalte “FaP-Pkt” (FaP = Fahrerlaubnis auf Probe) weder A noch B steht.
the clear proof that the distance was too low is that you were raised. There is no clearer situation not only in every way, but even in every way. And if you manage to get a driving ban even during the trial period, you are completely unsuitable as a package messenger. You should look for a job where you have nothing to do with driving motor vehicles. You ask the wrong questions.
not: what violation may I commit, which not
but: I am able to guide a motor vehicle
The distance was there. I know that one gives me 95% of the debt, but if I get a kick now my license is withdrawn, which I don’t want because I’m going to be called. My question is only recognized as a or b repulsion
It doesn’t matter what.
Pay and learn from it.
the distance was there, he was not enough. to remember: (kmh/10)×(kmh/10)
I don’t think you’re driving packages without a driver’s license. What violation this is you think I will learn from the driving station
Why didn’t you learn from your driving ban? that would not have happened. So why should you learn from it now? Or do you want to make every mistake and learn it from it?
I pay it naturally and of course I learn something from it. I wasn’t sure if the license was withdrawn from the 2nd or 3rd a. My question was answered nicely by another. Thank you
He won’t. far too busy he is with the question of what kind of violation it might have been
Thanks for the answer but this does not answer my question. That’s what I wrote up as a case that can’t happen, so it’s an a. My question is only if it’s an a beating