Is this warning considered vigilantism?

The situation is that when my sisters and I were little, on New Year's Eve a group of men from the neighborhood thought it would be funny to throw firecrackers at my sisters and me.

Since the group simply wouldn't stop and my father got angry because his children were in danger and he himself knew what could happen since he is a firefighter himself and has experienced a lot, he launched a rocket in the group's direction as a warning. The rocket did not injure the group however and was only intended as a warning and not to injure.

I can't remember anything about that time myself, but my father is a calm person and tries to sort everything out with words.

This sums up the situation and after my father's warning, this group of men never dared to throw firecrackers at children again.

My question came about because someone told me that my father had taken the law into his own hands.

That's why I wanted to hear someone else's point of view, because I don't think my father took the law into his own hands, he didn't hurt anyone or do anything else, and besides, it was about his own children who were very small at the time and the firecrackers could have caused anything from minor injuries to death.

Thank you in advance for your answers.

Unfortunately, I don't know exactly which topics are relevant to this question.

(1 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
petrapetra64
1 year ago

That’s self-justice. The legally correct way is to display attempted body injury and the day to get the police. That would be disgusting. Until the police arrive, they’ll get their children safe.

It would have made sense to make an announcement.

Fire a rocket on it, on the other hand, makes no sense. Even if it worked here. Imagine he would have hurt someone from them or an uninvolved person, he would have burned himself hard. Then he would have been there because of severe body injury and may pay a pension for life or high pain.

Or they would have understood it as funny and fired it right back. That would have jeopardized you first and it would have increased so much until there were many injured.

michele1450
1 year ago

Is self-justice and if your father knows how dangerous rockets and bulges are, even that is not such a good thing with the rocket

EnisLatskin
1 year ago

The definition of “self-adjustment” is not that someone was hurt. How stupid are you? You know how dangerous things can be and answer them exactly the same. Whether you’ve been hit by a gust or a rocket doesn’t matter in the hospital, the police also

MKUL7RA
1 year ago

Of course, your father has committed a form of self-justice.

Nevertheless, he has acted correctly.

Einzelfahrer
1 year ago

Self-justice I would not call it, danger already ( firefighter, knows what can happen) . It is also not, it would have been enough to bring the children out of reach of the shipyards. On the whole, it would have been quite unthinkable, if necessary, to shoot back rockets and escalation.