Are there many side effects when taking testosterone?

Of course, you can’t have experienced everything yourself if a “different” person tells me this (or I hope I understood it right) I accept it. – But I understand you somehow when a person suddenly speaks of a new “bad” when you speak the two extremes or Men and women think. – It is precisely not in between, but “I feel to be part of the two (in e.g. emotional and like to talk to women although I am physically a man and therefore do not fit into the normal male image)” etc. – Actually, these are just people who want to express themselves better than they feel (so I see that). And imagine you would have (I suppose) a woman in front of you, who you know who likes you, but then she says: although I stand on men, I can’t imagine sex because I have been raped, for example, – after that, she wouldn’t be 100% in the role of a woman. If it doesn’t bother her and she doesn’t mind, it’s okay. You might get annoyed.

The point at which I absolutely no longer go along and it will always refuse to acknowledge this bullshit is this new “non-Binary Divers scene”. This is absolute bullshit and has no comprehensible hand and foot.

…

But to say one would not belong to any of them, and a third can be expected, that will stop with me.

There is therefore no third sex, yes.

I suspect that the hormones in a body strongly influenced the affection and their own feelings and the hormones are also controlled by the brain and thus by their own will, “the own me”, and is probably a interaction of the hormones and their own me (e.g. the brain).

Thus, it can be explained that someone could feel like a child (no affection – asexual perhaps?) and thus does not correspond to the two patterns of gender roles. For expectations are usually set to a woman or a man. On behalf of me, when I say Mr X or Mrs X, formerly Miss X (which proved to be unmarried). – And not only that, our society attaches great importance to relationships, in advertising etc. that there is such a person who does not want to take any of the two roles, I can understand in my example.

For some reason, I prefer to use your word “conversion”. Otherwise you would have to call the person “equalizing man”, but we should see him as a man. Unless jeman comes now and thinks: no = Transmann. Maybe we’re imperfect -.- – If you think so, then a man with a miscarriage or under-average penis is even a “man”? – Maybe the future will think more and more in intermediate steps, as Divers does.