History of the Cold War?

Can someone explain to me which of the three research perspectives most plausibly explains the origins of the Cold War? (1. Western perspective, 2. Revisionist explanation, or 3. Not the threats, but the perception of the other side as a threat were decisive…)

Based on the history of events with containment and Cominform, as well as the formation of blocs… I'm stuck. Can anyone help me?

(2 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ralph9
1 year ago

Hello summerlife24110,

History of Cold War? Can anyone explain to me which of the three research opinions (first Western view, 2nd revisionist explanation or 3rd not the threatening but the perception of the opposite as a danger were decisive…

Try it best with the fact-sight. Soviet dictator Josef Stalin reigned from 1927 to 1953. He was the largest land robber and one of the largest mass murderers of the 20th century. Century. During the Second World War, he directly “accompanied” several states and joined the Soviet Union and, at the conferences of Tehran and Yalta, on the one hand, extorted a huge Soviet predominance sphere, which he would prefer to have subjected to Italy. He was not able to persevere, but from the Balkans the area of Soviet domination began and encompassed all Eastern Europe and parts of Asia. On the other hand, he also extorted a veto law of the permanent members of the UN Security Council, which should actually take binding decisions on peacekeeping.

So it was completely clear that Stalin would try to further expand his domination empire with all means. Events such as the communist February revolution in Prague or the Soviet Berlin blockade made it clear that Stalin would not hesitate to apply force if necessary to achieve its goals. Moreover, the Stalin regime had fallen into the hands of important knowledge about the then German rocket technique. Under these impressions of unmarried further Soviet military escalation readiness, NATO was founded in 1949 as a defence alliance because no single state would have been able to resist a Soviet attack.

mass protests of the oppressed population in the underlying countries were repeatedly violently defeated; one thinks of the former GDR in 1953 or the Hungarian popular uprising. The Sputnik shock in 1957 hit the free democratic states unprepared and showed that the Soviet regime has now been able to reach space with rockets and thus more or less every land of the earth.

In view of these facts and facts of the Stalin-Soviet regime, which has proved to be ready for escalation after the Second World War and its Soviet successors, the path to the “Cold War” was almost unstoppable. The so-calledly subjugated states formed the eastern block under the brutal domination of the Kremlin; and the free democratic states have to unite for reasons of their own safety, given the openly shown military escalation readiness of the Kremlin regime, which led to the formation of the two “bloods” at that time. As I said, the historical facts and facts, considered in the correct order of their processes, are both completely clear and very meaningful in this respect.

Greetings ðŸTM‚

zetra
1 year ago
Reply to  Ralph9

Single-sided report, completely incomplete and beautified. The diploma is a laugh. We’re back in the Cold War.

Ralph9
1 year ago
Reply to  zetra

Single-sided report, completely incomplete and beautified. The diploma is a laugh.

🤦

If such empty claims come from you, they are known the best confirmation of the facts and facts I have summarized – to which you can obviously not oppose the least this time as always; how to see your contentless claims.

Nothing prevents you from writing an answer here yourself. But you know that assertions that are not covered by facts and facts or are even refuted by them are quickly exposed, revealed, corrected and corrected by a wealth of competent users.

You know this very well, because it is known to be very comprehensive and urgent in a wealth of your answers and is therefore also fully justified.

🤷

We’re back in the Cold War.

Only the criminal Russian terror regime has forced the whole world into it.

Ralph9
1 year ago

Why should I, as you would have to know, have my report, which represented it, been kept.

Nope. I don’t know about that. I didn’t see any answer from you here.

But in view of the fact that GF is, as it is known, extremely generous in the moderation and only in rare exceptional cases intervenes in substance, it says a lot about your answer if it was apparently deleted.

Everything is wrong, it is not written later, but it is not technically pure, because Stalin is of course the only villain in it.

On the one hand, that you post content with the greatest frequency that is completely past the question you asked; or completely unrelated to posting any links only because you have them in your fundus, here on GF is as well known as the fact that your answers in this and in many other areas with just too brutal frequency are the need for a wealth of competent users to refute, correct and correct your assertions in a matter of fact, content, because often everything is wrong, what you write … .

zetra
1 year ago

Why should I, as you would have to know, have my report, which represented it, been kept. Everything is wrong, it is not written later, but it is not technically pure, because Stalin is of course the only villain in it.

Doris0007
1 year ago

My research reveals many aspects, here only one: Cold War, that is, weapons upgrade to use them as a threat and intimidation, without shooting, has something to do with psychological warfare. e.g. in the fight, try to make the opponent psychologically finished before the fight begins.

In the Bible, it is said to be “good service” because one trusts one’s own strength of struggle more than God. This may encourage reflection, which desires peace.