Gelbe Karte wegen THC, Führerschein in Gefahr?

Moin,

Vor ein paar Monaten wurde ich von der Polizei vor meinem Haus rausgezogen und sie zwangen mich zu einem Urin-Drogentest (die üblichen Verdachtsfälle wie bei all meinen Kollegen auch immer). Dieser war positiv. Lange rede kurzer Sinn, Blutabnahme angeordnet. Nach 6 wochen das Ergebnis 0,7ng THC, Abbauprodukt 17,1ng.
Hab dann vom Landratsamt ne gelbe Karte bekommen, nahm die aber nicht ernst da es wie ein schlechter Witz aussah bis ich vor kurzem recherchierte, dass es diese wirklich gibt und ernstzunehmend ist.
Auf jeden Fall wurde ich schon wieder rausgezogen und nach nem Alkoholtest gebeten. Nachdem Sie meine Personalien abfragten, wollten sie noch ein „freiwilligen“ Drogentest… Jaja

Jetzt meine Frage: Wenn ich unter dem Wert von den erlaubten 1.0ng bin passiert mir dann etwas, weil eigentlich bin ich ja immer legal unterwegs gewesen. Klar wenn ich drüber bin MPU und alles. Trotzdem macht mich diese gelbe Karte skeptisch, da es für mich kein Sinn ergibt warum diese 1ng grenze dann überhaupt existiert. Ich brauch etwas klarheit, sonst muss ich eben paar Wochen warten.

danke im vorraus

(3 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
49 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
heurekaforyou
3 years ago

Your statements are contradictory!

Of course, the police do not force anyone to a voluntary urine test.

Two years ago, you knew that.

I know you can refuse a quickest prove urine test…

You say:

Then I got a yellow card from the Landratsamt, but did not take it seriously because it looked like a bad joke until I recently researched that it really exists and is serious.

What yellow card is here. Can you name a link that describes the background of this measure in the use of drugs in road transport?

You want to know:

If I’m under the value of the allowed 1.0ng, then something happens to me because actually I’ve always been legally on my way.

Where is it written that the value mentioned is allowed?

What could happen to you if you don’t exceed a permitted value?

You write:

Sure when I’m over MPU and everything

This assumption is absolutely wrong!

Right is: Delicts of any kind related to drugs are forwarded by the police to the driving station. For example, a drug discovery in your car that would be classified as minor and not prosecuted.

If the driver’s licence has legitimate doubts about your suitability for driving motor vehicles in public transport, it can completely independently arrange a MPU.

That the value in the blood sample is not a criminal offence, says nothing about your consumption behavior in general. A regular proof of 6 or 12 months gives clarity and is therefore justified to verify the suitability of the test person.

Whether the yellow card becomes a red, decides the final conversation with a traffic psychologist next to the medical examination.

Fact is:

Either there are doubts about the suitability – then an MPU is arranged.

Or there are none. Without a violation, a custody would be legally ineffective!

The option “good luck, but next time………” (Gelbe map) has little room.

This playroom is even so tight that the driver’s licence must exclude any doubt.

If it cannot, the legal consequence is a MPU.

It’s not different.

heurekaforyou
3 years ago
Reply to  TheRipper1289

At the first time, the driving licence wrote that it does not yet see any need for action, but this could change in the event of further incidents or in the event of regular consumption.

So this is your 2nd chance?

A legal claim cannot be derived from the “Gelben Karte”.

It is also questionable whether the “yellow card” still exists.

I read that it was a project that was limited from 2014 to 2019.

The ‘Gelbe Card’ is a letter of information on yellow paper, which indicates that, when further alcohol-related incidents, crimes, possession of drugs or their consumption or acts with high aggression potential are announced, the suitability for driving vehicles must first be demonstrated by an assessment at a roadworthiness assessment centre.

https://www.loerrach-landkreis.de/en/Einschulanalyse?view=publish&item=service&id=1936

Road transport law

Article 2

Driving licence and driving licence

https://dejure.org/gesetze/StVG/2.html

You write:

……but the yellow card is criticized by many.

I can absolutely understand that!

An example:

The legal provisions relating to alcohol are clearly and unambiguously regulated.

Leading starter applies: 0.0 Promille – correct?

The “Gelben Karte” means:

….that when acquainting other alcohol-related incidents

It cannot, however, be that a preventive measure is based on applicable law.

The legislature provides for noticeable start-up seminars. The lobe is therefore not immediately away and also an MPU is not arranged.

The participant also does not have to take a test.

The seminar costs money and the trial period is extended from two to four years.

Anyone who makes the driver’s license is sufficiently informed of the legal consequences for violations.

The “Gelbe Map” could also be distributed as additional information material in the driving schools.

The “Gelbe Card” as a waiver of an already committed violation, protects the test person to take responsibility.

Schläger also benefit from the “Gelben Karte”.

…. in actions with high aggression potential….

Can the “yellow card” replace a behavioral therapy or an anti-aggression train? Hardly!

Necessary road traffic: These consequences are possible

Tat: Threatened with violence

Possible penalties: imprisonment up to three years or fine, withdrawal of driving licence, 3 points in Flensburg, driving ban (1 – 3 months)

This is understood by the German case-law of death in road transport:

https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/noetigung-im-strassenverkehr/

Already the attempt to kill road traffic is punishable!

The “Gelbe Card” is/was a blow to the face for people who were victims of types that the “Gelbe Card” gives the feeling that everything can’t be so bad.

Let’s see your thing again.

You cannot rely on a right that allows you to drive under drug use as long as a certain value has not been exceeded.

In the case of alcohol, the maximum limit of 0.5 promille applies.

If you are involved in a traffic accident, there are already 0.3 promille alcohol for a co-indebtedness. Whether you caused the accident plays a minor role.

There is therefore no right to alcohol at the tax, as long as the limit has not been exceeded.

No sanctions shall be imposed under 0.5 promille and without special vulnerabilities. That’s a big difference.

aXXLJ
3 years ago

There is no compulsion to participate in a quick test.
A blood sample can only be arranged if you show down symptoms during the control or have run out of hand.

Sometimes it is cheaper and less stressful to choose cannabis instead of taking part in motorized road traffic.
Concrete questions about “Gelber Card” can be found by phone at the driver’s license.

aXXLJ
3 years ago
Reply to  TheRipper1289

You don’t make the impression of being characteristically mature enough to run vehicles, Dude.

TheMagicMax
3 years ago

Moin,

the current regulations are absolutely absurd and do not follow a scientific basis. It’s time to change!

The video here could be very interesting for you. In particular, as regards behaviour in traffic controls 🙂

https://youtu.be/McihSX_5RlA

LG Max

ThadMiller
3 years ago

Never volunteer to test!

There is no value below 1.0ng, since this is the detection limit.

ThadMiller
3 years ago
Reply to  TheRipper1289

Sorry, I meant “relevant value.”

How often it was called voluntarily

forced me to a urine drug test

Okayyy

ThadMiller
3 years ago

It’s past. It can still be helpful for the future.

Peterlustig71
2 years ago

How long was your last joint here when you had the 0.7ng, had last also blood collection bin occasional consumer the last joint was 16 hours ago with me

justrup98
2 years ago
Reply to  TheRipper1289

And another question 😅 how can you be stopped 5 times with 5 times active Thc and you had to make a MPU or how? Or was it all in succession in the 9 weeks until it came to the MPU statement?

justrup98
2 years ago
Reply to  TheRipper1289

Servus du, at your 2.5 ng with 3 h what was that for a lot? Thick j or rather small spliff? Did exactly the same fucking 3.5 h before Mini bubatz smoked out..

Peterlustig71
2 years ago
Reply to  TheRipper1289

Habe die blutergebnise bekommen hatte 1,6 ng aktives thc und 8 ng thc cooc. Bis jetzt aber noch nichts von der führerschein Stelle gehört

justrup98
2 years ago

Yes I am really excited 😂 hope the car where the samples are delivered is exploded 😜

justrup98
2 years ago

Ich finde eh das die ganze Sache mit weed viel zu ernst ist.. weißt jetzt verlierst dein Lappen, wenn’s schlecht läuft auch alles andere.. aber Hauptsache bekifft fährst fast besser als nüchtern 😂 außer du bist so breit das dümmer bist wie ne Stubenfliege

war mir ne Ehre danke für deine Antworten. Ich hoffe du machst es auf Anhieb !

justrup98
2 years ago

Schaff mer scho irgendwie 😂

justrup98
2 years ago

I am happy about your advice

justrup98
2 years ago

Du meinst damit hoffentlich wirklich nur die MPU und nicht ein ungeeignet für immer 😂😭😭

justrup98
2 years ago

Yes either I come with a blue eye of it or I get completely one on sack MPU with double question…

justrup98
2 years ago

Du Ich hab ne kuriose Laufbahn die Hälfte der Vergehen wurden nichtmal der Führerscheinstelle gemeldet. Das mit der Trunkenheitsfahrt ist denen bekannt, ebenso der eine btm. Was sie nicht wissen ist das erste mal mit den 0,9 damals hat der Bulle der mich kannte gesagt er schreddert es sprich es wird nicht weitergeleitet( mein Glück ) Und das war alles bevor ich Auto gefahren bin sondern mit dem Mofa… ja ich weiß das des da kritisch sein könnte aber zum Konsum:

rauche mal abends ein joint meistens ein halber 5er den Rauch ich nur zur Hälfte .. Tag davor war’s au nur ein halber mit dem gleichen Zeug

und mit deinem Satz : „Da könnts gut sein das die Führerscheinstelle mal sagt der ist nicht tüchtig ein Fahrzeug zu halten.“ meinst du dann die MPU oder ?
um ehrlich zu sein geh ich eh davon aus …

trotzdem danke dir 🤝

justrup98
2 years ago

Of course this is all just riddles, but still I would be happy to see an assessment

justrup98
2 years ago

Very interesting story you 🙂 I’ll explain my case. So at 5:00 a.m. a joint smoked beeeer of that were not even 0.1 gram so really only leftovers from the Grinder so said. Was also not wide was weak stuff.. then 3-3.5 hours later the blood sample from the blues. 5 years ago I was very close to it (0.9) that I smoked 2 thick things on my own in the evening before, so 16 h after consumption so I build quite fast. Do you still believe in the information that I should be about it?
I know you can say badly to wait but it fucks me so off…

Still
3 years ago

I don’t understand why everyone’s always taking the test because the police are “threat”? You can sit down and ask for a judge to order them. (the police may not!)

Then it turns out whether the policeman is enough to bring the few evidence to a doctor.

Still
3 years ago
Reply to  TheRipper1289

Then we are talking about a crime under § 316 StGB and not of an OWI after 24a StVG. You should get a bus schedule.

heurekaforyou
3 years ago
Reply to  Still

Poker in traffic control can indeed be worthwhile!

A friend of mine told me that it can be worth refusing the alcohol test if the promille value is in the 0.5 promille limit.

Anyone who has much more intus has no chance. Policemen can guess very well if someone’s drunk.

The problem. If a blood withdrawal was arranged and this is negative, it is probably not so favorable for the police. Especially if the subject has to wait long for the doctor.

Such mistakes must also be attributed to the police person.

If the official has been repeatedly mistaken, it should be a reason why the policeman decides in doubt against the blood sample because he does not want to take the risk of being mistaken again.

But that only really works in the border area. If it works, the driver might have saved himself 1 month driving ban (points) and/or a few hundred.

It’s not nice, but it would also be penalizable, because of a positive blood sample.

Would it be interesting to find out whether it can actually be human disadvantages for the police if they are mistaken more often?

Still
3 years ago
Reply to  heurekaforyou

No, because the subject could have avoided error by the voluntary but rejected test. Alcohol was determined by odor, only the amount can be determined so hard;

A number of BPs without result would, however, in fact be crumbling at the official’s image, especially as the subjects could make criminal complaints for violation of the body in the office. (but this is low again, as Pusten would have avoided you KV!)

Still
3 years ago

from § 316 StGB: alcoholic beverages or other intoxicating agents

SinaSophie03
3 years ago

You were illegal all the time, there is this border.