Gebärmutter entfernung mit 16?
Ich möchte keine eigenen Meinungen dazu hören sondern nur Antworten die mir bei meiner Frage helfen.
Ich bin 16 und habe seit über einem Jahr starke PMS Symptome, meistens immer 2 Wochen. Da ich in Zukunft keine Kinder möchte habe ich schon länger überlegt mir die Gebärmutter entfernen zu lassen, dies würde ich am liebsten in den nächsten paar Monaten nun machen um mein Leben wieder ohne ständige Schmerzen und alles genießen zu können. Ich bin mir allerdings unsicher ob ich trotz Krankheit bis 18 warten muss? Hat jemand schon Erfahrungen was dies angeht und könnte mir weiterhelfen?
(1 votes)
Loading...
I don’t think it’s doing any doctor as long as you’re U18. Even with 18 it will certainly be difficult to find a doctor who is willing to provide doctors usually when it comes to sterilization/birth removal and is wife U35.
I would start looking for a doctor who really does the surgery after the 18th birthday.
All good 🙂
No one will perform this procedure as long as you are not full-year.
Probably not as young adults. Talk about it on occasion with your gynecologist.
Did you try to take the pill?
However, I do not want to take the pill for many reasons, I also had strong side effects thereof
Hello
Neither over or under 18, you can simply remove the uterus.
However, uterus removal is only carried out if there is an urgent reason to speak a disease, injury, prevention of a disease, psychological reasons (transgender). PMS is not a direct disease, it is the name for the occurrence of symptoms before the period which have a natural hormonal origin. You can treat PMS very easily.
The removal of the uterus is a great operation that can have risks and side effects. It usually comes into question only when other treatments do not sufficiently help. Means with you this will probably not be done simply because there would be the possibility for you to take the pill. As long as this possibility exists without any problems and you only make it “I don’t want it because….” you probably won’t get a hysterectomy. If you have to pay it yourself, which is in the four-digit to five-digit range.
Otherwise, there is still the possibility to taste it with strong underweight to disable the uterus but this is definitely not a lasting and healthy solution. Underweight can also reduce your life and cause damage. So this will not be an option.
In addition, the ovaries also produce hormones and they would then be lacking in any case, they do not have to be compensated for with medicines, but nevertheless it is something that the body needs first and a change except you take the rest of your life medicines. You will automatically come into the alternating years, which increases some risks, for example osteoporosis, asterosclerosis, disorder of cardiac vessels, etc. This is only the case with the radical hysterectomy, in the other cases the ovaries remain inside yet you will not get hysterectomy if you have not tried the other methods.
If you want this, you can also take the pill in the long-term cycle and thereby suppress your monthly bleeding. At best, you’ll talk to your gynecologist.
PMS can also be combated with monk pepper (a natural remedy). To get rid of the uterus because of PMS is how to cut off the whole hand just because you have a wart. This has only disadvantages, although one can treat the problem without radical means.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I hope I could help you 🙃
Good luck
LG
Jojo
I’ve already taken the pill and tried monk pepper, but it’s not going to be better, I don’t want to have children anyway and finally get rid of all the symptoms, which is why I want to have the uterus removal.
Still thank you
Have you ever been to the endocrologist?
If you still feel symptoms of PMS during taking pills, there might be another disease behind it and not PMS. It is impossible to have the PMS and it COMMITTEE other than PMS. Maybe you can treat what they find.
Yet you are not full-year.
I understand that the symptoms are annoying and burdening you, but your womb will only be removed to you under 18 if you don’t.
PMS is not a reason for hysterectomy.
Why shouldn’t it be gone after that?
1. There are drugs against PMS that are far less invasive.
2.) You get into the menopause and have to substitute the rest of your life estrogen, which can have severe side effects.
3. Even if you say you don’t have a child’s desire, it can change suddenly in ten or twenty years and then you stand there. Certainly, it can be that this never changes, but doctors are unhappy about it, because those are up to you when you regret your decision.
I’ve already taken both of them and it’s not the real one.
I do not want to discuss the subject with the children, because everyone has their opinion on it.
The pill helps most women, otherwise monk pepper can certainly help. PMS has almost every woman (and also some men who have a uterus), one stronger, the other less pronounced and that for millennia. By the way, a cervical distance brings you similar, if not worse symptoms, you won nothing at all.
Without uterus, no biological children.
(1) There are no correct drugs against PMS, otherwise 3 different doctors would have lied to me
2) I take due to the symptoms enough tablets also with side effects so after taking Oestrogen would be the smallest bad
3) That this can change is aware of what I strongly doubt, but there are still ways to get a child
It is a very dangerous procedure with high risks It depends on how important you are
This intervention is very important to me, I want to finally enjoy my life again.
You don’t have to wait (whose your parents agree)
Without cancer diagnosis, no doctor will remove the uterus from a minor – this is where everything else is tried conservatively. After a year, you are rarely already therapied.
A uterus removal is not a particularly dangerous intervention with the more common risks of each surgery and is carried out relatively frequently.
https://www.aok.de/pk/magazin/koerper-psyche/organs/hysterectomy-alles-ueber-die-gebaermutterrelfern/
In practice, additional factors result in comparison to theory. The specific differences depend on the doctor and the institution (hospital/special clinic).
Then the Schuster should stay with his bars and provide people in the first 10 minutes after arrival at the emergency place, instead of pinching such a nonsense.
I’m currently NFS and I’m gonna go to normal clinics soon
Of course, the other clink I have worked only in a specialist clink I know only in 2 weeks as it is in a normal clinic
And that’s why other clinics can’t? 😀
Well, two years ago, we worked in a clinic before I am NFS and that was a special clinic and there we did such procedures.
Routine interventions without special requirements can be carried out in any normal surgery with gynecological department. There is no need for specialized equipment as it would be necessary for complex interventions.
There is a lot more risky almond surgery and should really be done only in a specialized clinic. In fact, almondops are even carried out on an outpatient basis.
A uterus removal should be carried out in a specialized clinic, as they have experienced surgeons and state-of-the-art medical equipment specially designed for complex gynecological interventions. Specialized clinics also offer a more comprehensive aftercare and a multidisciplinary team to ensure that all possible complications can be detected and treated at an early stage. This increases safety and reduces the risk of unwanted side effects or long-term problems.
In practice, it is an ordinary routine intervention without any special risks that no special clinic requires; after all, this is operated in about every 6th woman. For comparison: Blinddarmops are carried out only at about 0.1% of the population.