Were there giants on Earth in the past?
I still wonder to this day where people came up with these stories back then. I mean, you can't just make something like that up. Someone must have seen something like that at some point.
And what about all this "proof" of their existence?
36 feet, that's almost 11 meters. Another question for religious people, especially Christians, Muslims, and Jews: If there were giants, were they simply a normal native species like animals, or were they also thrown out of paradise like humans?
(4 votes)
Loading...
With giants, it’s similar to dragons.
In the past centuries, people found the remains of various dinosaurs and the fairy tale was born around the dragon. As far as giants are concerned, bone finds are only about mammoth bones.
https://science.pr-gateway.de/der-riese-der-ein-mammut-war/
Of course, there were over-average people in the past, but you also have to remember that a few centuries ago the average size was much smaller. If 1000 years ago the average size was about 1.60 meters and suddenly someone ran around the corner at 2.10 meters, it must have been very impressive, but also scary.
People used to be smaller than today.
The Romans were also smaller than the great Kimbern, a Germanic tribe from the Danish coast, which coincided with some teutons in the Roman Empire.
And if there was a disease that kept people growing, it became a “RIESE”.
https://www.news.de/health/696680373/akromegalie-gross-wie-goliath/1/
You already read the stuff about Nephilim, etc. Something can be there. Only the stories e.g. from the book Enoch sound very fantastic.
There has been a lot lost in the turmoil of time. Do you ever really think there’s something to find out? – Very unlikely, but I remain vigilant. Maybe a prophet smoked something wrong.
However:
Great answer! I wonder sometimes.
Yep. That was also one of the reasons of the flood. Angels who turned against God have materialized themselves and witnessed children with women. Bastards, who could not multiply, but were only BÖSE and threatened to destroy humanity. The GUTENs would have been destroyed. Noah and his family had favor with God and were kept by the flood.
I’ve already dealt with the topic several years ago.
There are good arguments for this and Good arguments, too.
Finally, we’ll probably not be able to find out.
For my personal life, it has no effect.
It’s another big question mark that I’m standing like that.(must and can)
Lg
So great people did not exist biologically does not work. For the upright course as people have it, you would be too big and too heavy from just under 3 meters. Zb can be the largest person living today who is 2.51 meters tall is not wearing his own weight properly and must run on crutches. Otherwise, he has problems. The biggest ever living man was about 2.7 meters tall and died at 22 years he had severe health problems due to size. Even the heart would be too big at some point. Already that of giraffe is the largest of all landed and also very large in relation to the body because it has to pump blood several meters upwards. It weighs 12 kilos.
You have a lot of thought and exaggerated with sizes. Sometimes due to incorrect conclusion. The skulls of elephants zb were held for the place at which the trunk was sitting as an eye cavity. Certain bones were also kept zb beinknochem of zb elephants or mammoths for those of sprouts.
People also reported about 40-metre long snakes, 35-metre long sharks, 5 or 6-metre long tigers, 4-metre large spiders, etc that is the so-called jägerlatein or sailor’s yarn. With the size and danger, many beings are invented
In the biblical stories, before the flood, the giants are the Nephilim, or – after the flood – the Goliath is to have fought against the one David.
The Nephilim should have been descendants of angels in human form who took people to wife.
There is no further background about Goliath.
If you believe, you don’t have to.
There is no evidence for giants. People thought it out sometime. Just like all the other stories. The human skeleton is not designed to be so large. That’s why big people often have problems with joints, backs etc.
What is the reason for this? And what about the skeletons found?
Some people have a lot of imagination and can think about stories. Or have delusions. There are thousands of stories, myths and myths. This does not mean that everything is just because someone is published on any dubious page “Provides”. There are no skeletons of giants found😂
There were never any skeletons found by human giants. These are fake news.
Wrongly interpreted skeletal findings.
There were never 11m tall people.
An assertion without reason.
The explanation was a bit bumpy, but not false, the gigantopithecus really existed, he belonged to the human apes (was probably quite similar to a gorilla) and like the mammoth or the giant rotten of the so-called megafauna and has died for at least 100,000 years.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigantopithecus
😂
And you really think that…?
Big people weren’t. They were humanoid, they looked like us. Gigantopithecus (primat) also stood on two legs, had two arms and other human traits and was 3 meters tall.
Giant had completely different skeletons and were different from body construction. There were no people.
Giant as did dinosaurs. Both speak the Bible.
The most famous of them was ‘Goliath’.
Lg
I don’t know if this story was true.
Since I was not alive at that time
Damals waren die Menschen sehr groß
Je kleiner der Planet ist, desto geringer ist die Schwerkraft, und desto größer und höher werden die Kreaturen sein
Wissenschaftler hatten bewiesen, dass die Schwerkraft eines Planeten umso geringer ist, je kleiner er ist und je größer die Lebewesen sind, die auf ihm leben. Es wird geschätzt, dass die Erde nur 10% ihrer heutigen Größe hatte
ab Minute 1:50
https://youtu.be/gycamMG1WjU?si=SZ-Od5n4n4HisY5e
(Bereits am anfang Ton ausschalten/Untertitel aktivieren wegen Musik)
Im Video wird erwähnt das der frühere Planet wahrscheinlich nur ein Zehntel so groß war als heute
die Erde war während des Zeitalters der Dinosaurier viel kleiner. Sie wurde also auf 10 % ihrer heutigen Größe geschätzt
Aus der radiometrischen Datierung geht hervor, dass die Erde etwa 4,570 Milliarden Jahre alt ist. Die geologische oder tiefe Zeit der Erdvergangenheit wurde entsprechend den Ereignissen, die in jeder Periode stattfanden, in verschiedene Einheiten eingeteilt. Unterschiedliche Zeitspannen auf der Zeitskala werden in der Regel durch geologische oder paläontologische Großereignisse, wie z. B. Massenaussterben, abgegrenzt. Die Grenze zwischen der Kreidezeit und dem Paläogen wird beispielsweise durch das Kreide-Tertiär-Ereignis definiert, das das Aussterben der Dinosaurier und vieler mariner Arten bedeutete. Ältere Perioden, die vor dem zuverlässigen Fossilnachweis liegen, werden durch das absolute Alter definiert
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_time_scale
Aus diesem Grund gab es auf der Erde zum Beispiel riesige Dinosaurier. Da sie kleiner war, war auch die Schwerkraft geringer, und deshalb waren die Lebewesen, die auf ihr lebten, viel größer.
https://nautil.us/can-a-living-creature-be-as-big-as-a-galaxy-235859/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20the%20maximum%20mass,that%20are%2010%20times%20bigger.
Es gab bereits vor der Kreidezeit Dinosaurier
https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/did-all-dinosaurs-live-together-and-same-time#:~:text=The%20%27Age%20of%20Dinosaurs%27%20(,each%20of%20these%20three%20periods.
Das größte Insekt, das je auf der prähistorischen Erde gelebt hat, war eine Libelle, Meganeuropsis permiana. Dieses Insekt lebte in der späten Permzeit, vor etwa 275 Millionen Jahren.Diese Libellen hatten eine Flügelspannweite von fast 75 cm und ein geschätztes Gewicht von über 450 g (1 Pfund), was der Größe und dem Gewicht einer Krähe entspricht.
https://entomology.unl.edu/scilit/largest-extinct-insect
Fossilien einer Riesenschildkröte, die so groß wie ein Auto war, wurden in Südamerika entdeckt, berichten Wissenschaftler
Es handelt sich um eine der größten, wenn nicht sogar die größte Schildkröte, die jemals existierte, so der Hauptautor der Studie, Marcelo Sánchez, Paläontologe an der Universität Zürich, in einer Erklärung.
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/02/15/giant-turtle-fossil-discovered-south-america/4763480002/
(Ton ausschalten da Musik in dem Video zu hören ist)
Da die Tiere also vorher größer waren, so waren es auch die Menschen
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/education/explore/solar_system/activities/bigKid/planetPull/#:~:text=Planets%20have%20measurable%20properties%2C%20such,strong%20its%20gravitational%20pull%20is.
Die Wissenschaftler der NASA und der Harvard University sprachen über die wissenschaftliche Tatsache, dass je kleiner der Planet ist, desto geringer ist seine Schwerkraft und desto größer und höher werden seine Lebewesen sein
Damals war die Erde viel kleiner und hatte eine viel geringere Schwerkraft als heute. Deshalb gab es auf ihr wie bereits erwähnt riesige Dinosaurier.
https://spacecentre.co.uk/blog-post/growing-taller-in-space/#:~:text=The%20human%20body%20can%20grow,for%20a%20six%2Dfoot%20astronaut
Die Raumfahrt hat viele Auswirkungen auf den menschlichen Körper. Eine Auswirkung ist, dass die Körpergröße eines Astronauten zunimmt, während er im Weltraum ist. Die Zunahme der Körpergröße ist auf die geringere Schwerkraft zurückzuführen
Are you serious?
Scientists had shown that the gravity of a planet is the smaller it is and the greater the living beings that live on it. It is estimated that the Earth had only 10% of its current size
There are several documentation
The scientists of NASA and Harvard University talked about the scientific fact that the smaller the planet is, the lower its gravity and the greater its beings will be
https://nautil.us/can-a-living-creature-be-as-big-as-a-galaxy-235859/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20the%20maximum%20mass,that%20are%2010%20times%20bigger.
I’m sorry, but that’s bare nonsense. The earth has been as great as it is now, otherwise it would have been, by the way, to fall into the sun by the increase in mass.
I cannot spread it here because of copyright, but on Youtube there is a documentation where the following is mentioned:
Dr. Eiichiro Kokuba National Astronomical Observatory of Japan said:
No one has proven that because we only know a planet with life (the earth) and all other speculation. Beings, however, are subject to the laws of physics like anything else, and therefore, in their sizes, reach certain limits which are decisively determined by gravity.
Nobody appreciates that! The Earth has been around. 4.5 billion years the same mass. If the earth had only 10% of its mass, it could not keep its atmosphere as one can see very well at Mars. It has only a little more than 10% earth.
I cannot spread it here because of copyright, but on Youtube there is a documentation where the following is mentioned:
Dr. Eiichiro Kokuba National Astronomical Observatory of Japan said:
Darauf hatte ich bereits geantwortet
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/education/explore/solar_system/activities/bigKid/planetPull/#:~:text=Planets%20have%20measurable%20properties%2C%20such,strong%20its%20gravitational%20pull%20is
https://nautil.us/can-a-living-creature-be-as-big-as-a-galaxy-235859/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20the%20maximum%20mass,that%20are%2010%20times%20bigger.
Es wird geschätzt, dass die Erde nur 10% ihrer heutigen Größe hatte
Aus diesem Grund gab es auf der Erde zum Beispiel riesige Dinosaurier. Da sie kleiner war, war auch die Schwerkraft geringer, und deshalb waren die Lebewesen, die auf ihr lebten, viel größer.
Aus der radiometrischen Datierung geht hervor, dass die Erde etwa 4,570 Milliarden Jahre alt ist. Die geologische oder tiefe Zeit der Erdvergangenheit wurde entsprechend den Ereignissen, die in jeder Periode stattfanden, in verschiedene Einheiten eingeteilt. Unterschiedliche Zeitspannen auf der Zeitskala werden in der Regel durch geologische oder paläontologische Großereignisse, wie z. B. Massenaussterben, abgegrenzt. Die Grenze zwischen der Kreidezeit und dem Paläogen wird beispielsweise durch das Kreide-Tertiär-Ereignis definiert, das das Aussterben der Dinosaurier und vieler mariner Arten bedeutete. Ältere Perioden, die vor dem zuverlässigen Fossilnachweis liegen, werden durch das absolute Alter definiert
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_time_scale
Yet, scientists talked about the scientific fact that the smaller the planet is, the lower its gravity and the greater and higher its beings will be
There are several documentation
https://nautil.us/can-a-living-creature-be-as-big-as-a-galaxy-235859/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20the%20maximum%20mass,that%20are%2010%20times%20bigger.
There is a documentation on Youtube where you can learn the following
Dr. Eiichiro KokubaNational Astronomical Observatory of Japan said:
Um, so this is extreme for your standards now.
He is also convinced that the moon was split. 😄
https://nautil.us/can-a-living-creature-be-as-big-as-a-galaxy-235859/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20the%20maximum%20mass,that%20are%2010%20times%20bigger.
This page does not mean that the Earth has ever had only 10% of its current size.
It is estimated that the Earth had only 10% of its current size
For this reason there were, for example,huge dinosaurs. Since it was smaller, gravity was also lower, and therefore the living beings who lived on it were much greater.
Then the mass increase should have happened by 90% in the tiny period since the dinosaurs… sometimes regardless of whether you have ourious sources or translated incorrectly… That’s what you’re saying, isn’t it?
On top of that, you have only repeated a bit of a mill like a pick-up, which has long been there – but this does not make any sense or more correct.
You think if you only repeat this nonsense often enough, will it be more credible?
Your thesis is bullshit and ready.
That didn’t say any Youtuber or Hobbyastronom, that was a documentation
As already mentioned
https://nautil.us/can-a-living-creature-be-as-big-as-a-galaxy-235859/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20the%20maximum%20mass,that%20are%2010%20times%20bigger.
It is estimated that the Earth had only 10% of its current size
For this reason there were, for example,huge dinosaurs. Since it was smaller, gravity was also lower, and therefore the living beings who lived on it were much greater.
Of course there was a life
Fromradiometric datingthat the earth is about4.570 billionyears old. the geological ordeep timeEarth pastness was divided into different units according to the events that took place in each period. Different periods of time on the time scale are usually delimited by geological or paleontological major events, such as mass extinction. The boundary between the chalk time and the paleogen is defined, for example, by the chalk-tertiary event,that meant extinction of the dinosaurs and many marine species.Older periods prior to reliable fossil detection are defined by absolute age
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_time_scale
Of course, the potential size of beings depends among other things (!) on the gravity and thus the size of the planet. It’s always known. But that the Earth should have increased by ten times, is also bullshit when someone claims on the Internet. Youtube is not a scientific source, and not all that any Japanese says must therefore vote.
Consider that the age of the dinosaurs is just 65 million years ago. This would mean that the Earth would have become much larger in this incredibly small period.
Moreover, there is no copyright obstacle to mentioning a proof of origin for a quote.
I can show English and the sources I had mentioned in any case what I had mentioned here
I had already explained what I could not show because of copyright, but still I have mentioned other sources
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/education/explore/solar_system/activities/bigKid/planetPull/#:~:text=Planets%20have%20measurable%20properties%2C%20such,strong%20its%20gravitational%20pull%20is
https://nautil.us/can-a-living-creature-be-as-big-as-a-galaxy-235859/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20the%20maximum%20mass,that%20are%2010%20times%20bigger.
And on Youtube there is a documentation
Okay, so you can only repeat your nonsense for the x-th time and don’t answer my questions. All right.
Learn English and get involved with geology. Gives many good docuses, such as some of Terra X.
And bye…
Wie bereits erwähnt
Das war nicht irgendein Youtube oder ein Hobbyastronom sondern eine Dokumentation
Die Quellen die ich genannt hatte zeigen auf jeden Fall das was ich hier erwähnt hatte
Ich kann es wegen urheberrechtlichem Grund hier nicht verbreiten aber auf Youtube gibt es eine Dokumentation wo folgendes erwähnt wird :
Dr. Eiichiro Kokuba National Astronomical Observatory of Japan sagte:
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/education/explore/solar_system/activities/bigKid/planetPull/#:~:text=Planets%20have%20measurable%20properties%2C%20such,strong%20its%20gravitational%20pull%20is
https://nautil.us/can-a-living-creature-be-as-big-as-a-galaxy-235859/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20the%20maximum%20mass,that%20are%2010%20times%20bigger.
Es wird geschätzt, dass die Erde nur 10% ihrer heutigen Größe hatte
Aus diesem Grund gab es auf der Erde zum Beispiel riesige Dinosaurier. Da sie kleiner war, war auch die Schwerkraft geringer, und deshalb waren die Lebewesen, die auf ihr lebten, viel größer.
Aus der radiometrischen Datierung geht hervor, dass die Erde etwa 4,570 Milliarden Jahre alt ist. Die geologische oder tiefe Zeit der Erdvergangenheit wurde entsprechend den Ereignissen, die in jeder Periode stattfanden, in verschiedene Einheiten eingeteilt. Unterschiedliche Zeitspannen auf der Zeitskala werden in der Regel durch geologische oder paläontologische Großereignisse, wie z. B. Massenaussterben, abgegrenzt. Die Grenze zwischen der Kreidezeit und dem Paläogen wird beispielsweise durch das Kreide-Tertiär-Ereignis definiert, das das Aussterben der Dinosaurier und vieler mariner Arten bedeutete. Ältere Perioden, die vor dem zuverlässigen Fossilnachweis liegen, werden durch das absolute Alter definiert
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_time_scale
No, they still don’t show. Apparently, your English is not good enough.
Perfectly right. More than 4.5 billion years ago the earth started small and then became increasingly in the early solar system within few million years. This was then also completed relatively fixed (relatively seen) and the last big event was the collision with a small planet, which led to the emergence of our moon.
So nowhere is something said that the Earth 65 million years ago only 10% of their present mass.
But because (yet) Sunday is, I’ll get on your… Please explain to me the following:
Where did the remaining 90% of the current mass come within the last 65 million years? Asteroids or comets fall away because they no longer absorbed enough mass after planetary formation. So where did it come from?
Why do we find fossils from dinosaurs and many after older fossils? With only 10% of the current mass, the Earth 65 million years ago would be about marshal with a radius of approx. 3,400 kilometres had been. Now the radius is over 6.350 kilometers. So all fossils would have to be under a layer of almost 3,000 kilometres Rocked. So how did they get up?
I’m excited!
*Your pupil
This was not some youtube or a hobby astronomer, but a documentation that received the following nomination:
Gemini Award for Best Original Music Score for a Documentary Program or Series
Why so aggressive? The sources I had called show in any case what I had mentioned here
As already mentioned
I cannot spread it here because of copyright, but on Youtube there is a documentation where the following is mentioned:
Dr. Eiichiro Kokuba National Astronomical Observatory of Japan said:
If you believe everything that is claimed on YouTube, I can’t help you either. Your links and quotes do not prove your nonsense and really no scientist (so exactly) No) have ever claimed such a nonsense.
Point and end.
I did not invent this, but this is mentioned in a documentation and what I had mentioned is definitely in the links
Who are you trying to fool?
As already mentioned
There is a documentation on Youtube where you can learn the following
Dr. Eiichiro KokubaNational Astronomical Observatory of Japan said:
Even by constant repetition, nonsense is not better. And it’s not written anywhere in your web links. But what do I say here? As a geologist I have no idea about it.
Oh, my God.
So, now let’s take it, the Earth was 90% smaller and Dinosaurs lived on it.
Where did 90% of the mass come from?
If the Earth was bombarded with 90% mass increase, how can we dig the stoned bones a few centimeters or meters below the current Earth’s surface?
As already mentioned
https://nautil.us/can-a-living-creature-be-as-big-as-a-galaxy-235859/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20the%20maximum%20mass,that%20are%2010%20times%20bigger.
It is estimated that the Earth had only 10% of its current size
For this reason there were, for example,huge dinosaurs. Since it was smaller, gravity was also lower, and therefore the living beings who lived on it were much greater.
Of course there was a life
From radiometric dating that the earth is about 4.570 billion years old. the geological or deep time Earth pastness was divided into different units according to the events that took place in each period. Different periods of time on the time scale are usually delimited by geological or paleontological major events, such as mass extinction. The boundary between the chalk time and the paleogen is defined, for example, by the chalk-tertiary event, that meant extinction of the dinosaurs and many marine species. Older periods prior to reliable fossil detection are defined by absolute age
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_time_scale
Slowly. Yes, the earth was much smaller at the beginning of its creation. No, there was no life on Earth at that time. Life has formed billions of years later, long after the earth had its final size.
It’s not that hard to understand!
It is estimated that the Earth is only10%its current size
So what? This is not our planet, it is a hypothetical one!
https://nautil.us/can-a-living-creature-be-as-big-as-a-galaxy-235859/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20the%20maximum%20mass,that%20are%2010%20times%20bigger.
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/education/explore/solar_system/activities/bigKid/planetPull/#:~:text=Planets%20have%20measurable%20properties%2C%20such,strong%20its%20gravitational%20pull%20is.
Yeah, Planet Earth started small. About 4.5 billion years ago. Then there was the evil Theia that collide with the earth.
But then nix more than a few thousand tons a year by meteorites.
There is a documentation on Youtube where you can learn the following
Dr. Eiichiro Kokuba National Astronomical Observatory of Japan said:
In any case, this meant the Earth
In a documentation on Youtube you learned the following
Dr. Eiichiro Kokuba National Astronomical Observatory of Japan said:
This was not meant by the earth or just theoretically.
The earth was not 90% smaller, then there was life, then suddenly 90% larger.
I hear or read about this assertion now for the first time anything, and I have been seeing docuss and reading articles in reputable journals about the formation of the earth and life during the mesozoic, that is, the so-called “dinosaur period”.
As a hobby astronomer, I also know why Mars has no dense atmosphere.
Here is a brief thought experiment, which would happen to the earth or us if it were only half as big.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i63KOWiRTeA
Neither you nor I are scientists, I share with what scientists had said
Such a mischief…
How shall the earth suddenly have put so much on earth?!
How funny. Where did the remaining 90% come from at once?
According to the Bible, there were giants on earth, which should have been the descendants of human women and sons of God. Because it is written in the Bible, evangelicals are now trying to prove that it is true and not fairy tales. That’s all nonscientific bullshit.
Interesting question, I think that there were big people between 2-3 meters and there. 11 meters is a giant.