Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
31 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dieLuka
2 years ago

Depends on the situation.

“You are pregnant. You want to run? I’ll pay!” I think it’s strange.

I would urgently need money in connection with the abortion and ask my acquaintance because I could not help anyone other knowledge of me and the girlfriend says “Don’t worry, I’ve got enough and I’ll pay for that for you” I’d find that very nice.

However, as far as I know, the cost of very low incomes is taken over at the request.

https://www.profamilia.de/themes/pregnancies

So I don’t know if there could necessarily be an emergency situation where you really need to be financially dependent on others to do it.

And the financial emergency would be for me the point that would make the interference okay.

Personally, I would also find it more than strange to be asked for financial assistance here, unless one is in fact in such a special situation that one can only carry out the intervention with my financial support.

Elli113
2 years ago

I don’t understand the question. If the friend of the acquaintance is unable to pay the intervention himself, then she may submit an application for a cost acceptance.

And if the cost is not accepted, the payment should not be a problem.

In addition, of course, there is still room for the producer to pay his part.

Only if it is really not possible financially, then I would borrow money. But only then.

Deamonia
2 years ago

No, it’s kind of big track.

Because if the woman deserves little, the costs are taken over at the request, and if she deserves enough, she doesn’t need any financial help, so then this would be more idolly, according to the motto “Pock it, I take it”

Generally, it is for me to help friends, also financially, but instead of giving away better, because at the end everyone should pay their bills because so no imbalance in friendship arises. (I don’t mean bills now, of course, when you go to dinner or bring something from shopping to the other. (But you have to be careful not to be exploited, there should be one and take)

isebise50
2 years ago

I do not understand this – either the “friend of an acquaintance” has no or only a small own income (at the time €1,258 net) and it does not have any short-term viable assets at its disposal, then it may submit an application for cost-taking. The costs are taken over by the federal state in which they live, but they must submit the application to your health insurance fund.

Or she has the appropriate means and does not have to pump a friend of her.

Happy for you!

armeskaenguru
2 years ago

Hello

This is about the polin? If you pay her this because she doesn’t have the money, I can understand. Of course it is not, not everyone has girlfriends who can or want it.

Kind regards

tm

LePetitGateau
2 years ago

I would rather find it very strange when it was the girlfriend of a Known is – doesn’t know what I’d have to interfere with.

If you find yourself in this situation, you should also regulate it among yourself. Not with perfect strangers.

But even with friends, I wouldn’t offer this kind of thing…because I’m really weird and who doesn’t have the money (civil money cover) gets it paid anyway

Jack98765
2 years ago

I don’t find it generous or self-evident, but gaga. If she wants to abort, she should pay for it herself or her boyfriend. They don’t seem to want the kid. This is their problem and not yours.

HarryXXX
2 years ago

What’s your name? With money, friendship stops.

At most, I would really lend some money to very good friends, but even there I am not so sure. Undoubtedly, I would provide a good friend with food for one or two weeks. But why pay for abortion? Either they can pay it themselves or there is a need. In both cases, this would be regulated.

Andi333845
2 years ago

In any case, at least lend so that the abortion does not fail in money

BeviBaby
2 years ago

I would first ask myself why the person does not pay her abortion himself. And then it would probably borrow it at most.

And I would feel quite as ashamed if I had to get something out of people I only know by third parties.

Deamonia
2 years ago
Reply to  BeviBaby

I also wonder how such a situation should come about.

“Boar bruda my old man is pregnant”

“Nä digga real? What do you think I’m having her abortion?”

O

sarah3
2 years ago

No illegal abortion I would not pay

Leopatra
2 years ago
Reply to  sarah3

What do you exclude illegality?

sarah3
2 years ago
Reply to  Leopatra

From the current verdict of the BVerfG that is the basis of the 218.
here it is well explained:” If the abortion occurs on your own desire, one speaks of an illegal abortion. But he remains impunity if he is executed within twelve weeks after the conception. ‘

wilees
2 years ago
Reply to  Leopatra

e.g. an abortion aimed at abroad after the end of the 12th century. Week. Otherwise, the costs will be taken over if necessary.

sarah3
2 years ago

What does nothing change the illegality

ATateMessias
2 years ago

I guess I can borrow her, but I don’t pay for it.

Pangaea
2 years ago

Pregnancy breaks are paid by the health insurance.

Serenety78
2 years ago
Reply to  Pangaea

No!

Pangaea
2 years ago
Reply to  Serenety78

However, if the income of the woman concerned falls below a certain limit. And it’s only about this one that’s in the question, because who deserves enough does not pump friends.

sarah3
2 years ago
Reply to  Pangaea

The 98% illegal may not be paid, only criminal and medical abortions allowed are paid

HarryXXX
2 years ago
Reply to  sarah3

In the case of social need, there is also a claim for payment. And the matter with illegality can be considered very different.

wilees
2 years ago
Reply to  Pangaea

Only in a medical or criminal indication.

Elli113
2 years ago
Reply to  Pangaea

No, indistinguishable abortions are not cash benefits.

If the woman does not have or has a low income, she may submit an application to the sickness insurance fund for the receipt of costs; but also then the health insurance does not pay for the intervention.

Andi333845
2 years ago
Reply to  Pangaea

Unfortunately not all

sarah3
2 years ago

It was about the illegality that is clear. And illegal abortions must not be paid by the KRankenkasse.

HarryXXX
2 years ago

This applies only to the health insurance companies. In case of need, the costs are normally taken over by the country.

sarah3
2 years ago

No, this is the legal position of the BVerfG

sarah3
2 years ago

Even then, the cash register is only a continuous heater

Serenety78
2 years ago

Abortion is not always paid by the cash register. So your answer was to understand. That in this case the money is missing is your guess, but is not here.

wilees
2 years ago

you find it generous if you take over the cost of abortion for the friend of a friend,

Why should someone do this…

In so far as the data subject has too little income, the costs of a termination of pregnancy are taken over by the taxpayer in the event of a social indication (whose takeover is to be requested at the KK).

Otherwise, the potential child-father should be responsible.