Boyfriend wants to lie to urologist?
My friend and I recently talked about circumcision because he also wants to be circumcised like me.
Then he said couldn't he just tell the urologist that he gets pain when he gets an erection or that he feels pain when he tries to pull back his foreskin even though he doesn't feel any pain. Will his health insurance cover that?
I simply said I have no idea and wanted to ask here
The doctor won’t believe he’s in pain when the foreskin floods with him without any problems. The pain is caused by a possible narrowing or bonding of the foreskin. If both are not given, don’t hurt.
I’d say that your friend should be happy to have a sparkling foretaste. If he wants to get rid of them, he should also pay the fees incurred when removing a completely healthy preskin.
Try. None of us know the Urologen.
Or just say he doesn’t have money for circumcision, but he wants to.
I’m a big circumcision fan. Can understand the wish that he wants to get rid of the foreskin.
Fairplay is important. He should pay for it himself. But he can also say completely free as he wants.
He can tell if the doctor believes it after an investigation is something else.
I must say, however, that I have heard from some urologists who are positively opposed to circumcision, and then I wish.
He can say that, of course. He is then examined and then the urologist will find that it is not true.
But how does the Urologist want the evidence that it doesn’t really hurt him?
Of course. There he sees whether there are constrictions or not
And even then, as a rule, he will treat himself differently and only do circumcision when everything else does nothing – and he has the impression that the patient simply sabotages the treatment consciously.
It won’t work. It’s not advisable anyway, after all, she’s got her sense. It is itself erogenous zone (especially inner pre-skin leaf and pre-skin ribbons) and obtains the sensitivity of the acorn and its natural glidability.
He should stay with the truth. Cutting from your own pocket is not so expensive. Costs up 300€.
If he wants to have it, he should pay it himself. Between 200-800€ approx.
Right. A person who wants to change his body with oh rings, piercings and tattoos must also pay for himself.
If it’s not medically indicative is definitely….
The doctor will know what he wants, they’re used to it. And there will be a diagnosis that fits
of course he can say that. the urologist doesn’t care, he’s paid for the circumcision of the sickness fund.
the guy is supposed to say he has bad pain. the doctor then writes up, bad pain and after the op no one can check what was
No, that’s not how it works. A doctor must not carry out surgery, who is not a medical reason – except he would be a beauty surgeon.
and what about ritual circumcision?
He can. But there’s something different and controversial for years. It’s been thinking for a long time whether that’s right.
I read carefully. For non-religious reasons, circumcision is not performed on request only.
But he can do it. Please read more carefully.
It is also not paid by the sickness fund and, as ear holes stand, falls under purely cosmetic treatments which parents may choose for their minor children.
It’s insurance fraud and criminal. If he wants that he must pay for it himself
Unprobably. Marts do not carry out interventions because they say you would like to.
He should have a pimosis or something. But even then, creams or so are worked before nipples.
And cosmetic treatments are of course not paid by the health insurance company.
But he’d say he had severe pain and how does the urologist want to prove that he didn’t have it?
If I say that I have pain in an erection and reject the ointments, the doctor cannot force me to use the ointments
Right. But he can – and must – refuse to operate if you reject conventional treatments and further investigations.
Why? Because it doesn’t suit you, I’m right and you don’t?
You don’t want to understand,but that’s your thing, with such consulting-resistant people I don’t discuss anymore, because I’m just as good talking to the wall
You’re nuts, right. And the doctor does not take surgery if he can find no need.
The ARZT decides what treatment is appropriate, not the patient. But the patient can give his consent or reject it.
The doctor cannot examine this and I am not obliged to use the ointment, the patient can decide how to treat it
Well, that could be investigated achon. I don’t know if it’s done. Nonetheless, no serious doctor directly cuts the foreskin, because the patient says that it hurts.
How does he want to investigate if an erection goes back or not?