Moin Moin in die Runde.
Eben traf ich auf diesen Artikel:
Findet ihr die staatliche Regulierung in diesem Fall sinnvoll? Ist es die Aufgabe des Staates in einem Fall wie diesen einzugreifen? Und löst man damit überhaupt ein Problem? Oder übernimmt hier der Staat die Aufgaben der Eltern?
(1 votes)
Loading...Zum Programmieren und spielen?
Weiß jemand wann ebay das von meinem Konto abgebucht?
Ich habe immer sehr viele Süßigkeiten gegessen, momentan esse ich aber keine mehr und möchte das auch durchziehen. Wie sieht’s bei euch aus?
Welche fachliche Ausbildung habt ihr (Ausbildung, Weiterbildung, allenfalls andere Berufserfahrung)? Für welche Organisation/Staatsstelle arbeitet ihr? Wie sieht euer Arbeitsalltag aus? Wie sieht der fachliche Austausch aus (Teamsitzungen, Supervision, Weiterbildungen etc.)? Welche externen Vernetzungen gibt es (Zusammenarbeit mit Ärzten, Psychologen, Sozialarbeitern, Polizei etc.)?
Mein Twitter verlauf wird seit einiger Zeit nur noch mit Dingen vollgemüllt, die ich garnicht erst sehen will. Leider nicht nur von ein paar Accounts sondern unzähligen. Wie krieg ich das alles ordentlich weg?
“Or does the state take over the tasks of parents?” – I would just clink in here: as far as I understand the article, parents could decide before and after that.
The only difference is that some burden is taken from parental supervision and instead some kind of age verification burdens the citizen and the company.
If the whole thing goes with an identity card obligation, I would be opposed. The resulting risk factor that users could be deanonymized seems to me somewhat too high to ensure that guardians no longer need to be responsible for the media consumption of children in a matter of urgency.
And if it were the usual to enter a date of birth, it is not worth the effort for obvious reasons.
I honestly lack in the article above all the goal you want to achieve with it 🤨 that was not really formulated in any place.
As we refer to the law, which regulates the creation of accounts under 15 years of age, we can take over the grounds of the legislator of that time, as reported in English media (in terms of legality with EU data protection and the method of age verification, we are also there to prepare for it):
-pornography
-cyberstalking (probably meant cyberbullying or bullying)
-untainable beauty standards
-attention-grabbing addictive nature of the platforms, which pose a particular risk for youth
Very well worked out. I practically came to the same result. The survey actually only confirms one more thesis: it is not dealt with a topic, but rather the easy way chosen.
Even if he doesn’t.
(1) Pornography: In general, it is, of course, already regulated by law anyway – however, softporn can already be found on a large scale on social media (optionally also in the humorous context, but does not change the circumstance). The application of sexual services is also noticeable.
Even though the negative effects of pornography were more developed in the young present, it remains a significant risk potential in early sexualization. In this respect, I think this point is most justified – but I am uncertain how active and consciously young children would perceive and pursue sexual content at all.
(2) Cyberbullying: In fact, if not really by strangers, but by acquaintances, it would be less to prevent this legal regulation. At least I did not find any contradictory claims in the fast.
(3) Beauty standard: I would be unknown that this problem has never been existent. What medium does it seem difficult to judge, especially without comparative data from the future. In addition, this does not really concern children, but rather young people and young adults, and is more likely to emerge from the scope of the law.
(4) Search factor: A part of the present that seems unavoidable to me. Likewise, the knowledge of negative psychological influences is also rather uncertain.
But is a regulation of this kind of social media even suitable for this?
All these things are rather outside the social networks.
Is actually the right way, but de Franzosen will reject the proposal because they see their freedom in danger and after that they are whining about this social media and letting them deal with the claw of the crane at Psychoklempner. There are things that just don’t change.
Asocial Media makes children sick.
And not adults?
Also.
Look at the documentary “The Dilemma with the Social Media”.
I know, and that’s not a real answer. If then please explain your point.