Fotos durch Eltern in Schule. Wie steht es um den Datenschutz?
Ich kenne es eigentlich nicht anders, dass eine Schule (in diesem Fall in Hessen) durch eindeutige Bekanntmachungen und immer wiederholende Erinnerung bei Veranstaltungen aktiv dafür sorgt, dass nicht jeder auf dem Schulgelände herum rennt und fotografiert oder filmt.
Bei unsere aktuellen Schule erlebe ich bei Veranstaltungen ein hemmungsloses Filmen und Fotografieren und keine Ansprache durch das Lehrpersonal. Daher habe ich mal die Schulleitung dazu befragt, warum dies so ist.
Die Antwort hat mich ein wenig überrascht. Die Schulleitung hat geantwortet, dass im Einvernehmen mit dem Elternbeirat das Fotografieren bei Veranstaltungen erlaubt ist und eben die digitale Weitergabe verboten.
Zieht sich hier die Schulleitung ein wenig einfach aus der Verantwortung? Ich mein, heute werden alle Bilder direkt in Cloud-Dienste hoch geladen. Auch privat in Chats geteilte Bilder bei den jeweiligen Diensten gespeichert und so weiter.
Kann eine Schulleitung das so handhaben?
(3 votes)
Loading...
The school management cannot justify this scheme solely by the consent of the parent council. It continues to be responsible for compliance with data protection regulations. A solution could be to maintain data protection through clear communication and consent while providing parents with an appropriate framework for memory photos. But please don’t cook anything too hot, that sounds like you wanted to trigger outrage.
Why cook hot? There are data protection guidelines for this reason. Of course, everyone can decide whether to upload pictures of his children to big data. Many people do that very uninhibited.
Because there are people who do not handle this, there are clear data protection rules to protect these people and especially children. So if I don’t have it in my own hands, it’s good if there are instances that protect me and the child from it. In this case, this should be the school management with a concrete implementation of data protection.
Here she sees this as adequately negotiated when you say parents “Make them what they want, but do not upload it anywhere.”
The problem is more likely to be the directives because they have been poured into law far from reality.
Data protection has an alibi function, but the phone is primarily a surveillance device. What else can be done personally with the device supports either the monitoring or is distraction from the actual function.
To complain about the violations of any directives is about how to protect themselves from wetness in the monsoon rain.
Even if there are different regulations on the use of mobile phones on the school grounds at national level, they all go beyond the same result: The school defines the scope for the use of electronic helpers.
Greeting Matti
There are two levels of usage here anyway.
You agree to or do not agree with the admission to school/ kindergarten whether or not picture and film material may be used for teaching purposes or press articles by the school or not. But it’s about material that the school creates.
And then there is the level I have addressed, where parents photograph and film at events and co. Here I see school as a place where children’s protection must be enforced as best possible in this respect.
With us in the kindergarten, the line has fundamentally prohibited the use of mobile phones on the entire site and at each event there is a clear announcement. There the kindergarten itself creates picture material and makes it available in accordance with data protection. Children who are not to be seen, because destiny does not agree, are taken out. So it can work.
A struggle against a monsoon has become it in everyday life. All filming everything around them, people have lost every inhibition.
Theoretically, almost everything you say is right, but I’m staying with it all being distracted from the essence. While you’re thinking about these things, the cell phone will become a bit more indispensable every day, even if its use is prohibited in some places.
I bought my first, and so far only smartphone 2018, there I was 60 years old. I knew what I was getting into. If such a thing is under the fir tree for six years, this is good in the sense of the inventor, but the recipient is totally overwhelmed; anyway my thesis. And the parents are at the latest when they argue with the child about the correct handling of the phone. But as I said, all distractions.
I don’t understand the problem.
Let people take pictures.
You can contact the school manager in writing.
It’s not that easy. If there is no consent of the photographed persons (or by their legal representatives), the photographing is not generally prohibited, but is limited by the automatic upload to a photo-cloud in the very best case up to prohibited.
What the parent advisory board says is completely irrelevant, as this is about personality rights. You can’t just put them out of your mind.
The punishments can be quite sensitive.
Above all, we got a flyer to children’s rights the other day. Personal rights were also a topic there. And that’s where it belongs to me. Children have the personal right not to be photographed ignorantly in the school context and then to be uploaded somewhere.
I’ll give you the right.
The rest should judge experts.
People don’t just photograph their child. They photograph everything and film it. Whether that’s so okay for other parents isn’t asked big. And we all know that these content will be shared where they land in the Big Data Schlund. I think that’s a problem. School is for me one of the few places where compliance with such simple rules should be enforced.
If I go with my child to an event outside school where I can’t control it, I can decide freely. I don’t have a choice at school and I have to rely on compliance.
And that you don’t have to ask this question again and again, I’ll help you find an answer: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/children's rights
Don’t understand the question you’re asking. Children are few mature people than adults and can stand less for themselves if they don’t like something. Whether it’s a photo at school, how to talk to them or how to treat them in general and so on. Unfortunately, there are always social disorders that require topicalization.
I’m experiencing this very often with mine. If I move in public space and we don’t just move in a super full shopping mall, for example, I don’t run behind my kids and constantly drag them to the side, because somewhere someone wants to pass where they might be in the way. You can talk to children like any adult. They also react. Only about half of the adults prefer to treat the children non-verbal. They are then simply touched and pushed to the side.
Whenever I read “Children’s Rights”, do I ask (mir) whether children are not humans?