Flight Simulator (FSX) A320 Probleme ?

So, not to say it again:

So, in advance: I know that Aerosoft thought of the A320 as a “beginner plane”, which is why they have dispensed with complexity. It should be said that beginners are not stupid. My first plane was the PMDG 737, at that time for 40€ on Ebay. The biggest problem I had at the time was the FMC, and this is the biggest problem among beginners. After several readings of the attached instructions and a few trying, this problem was no longer there. I would appreciate it if there is a simple and advanced mode at the A320 in the FMC. For example, a step by step input could be a great option. You didn’t do that because it was work. Instead, one simply took the Airbus, a FMC that doesn’t really work well, and puts it as the “ultimative beginner plane”. That would be the first. All I’m counting is certainly not due to “simple” but to “totally misprogrammed, but you can market it” But first the positive: The Airbus looks very good. The displays and also the external model are as in reality, making the Airbus a super screenshot flyer. Unfortunately, we already get to the negative: there is nothing behind the great scenery. Outside hui inside pfui. The displays are illogical, the flight behavior is similar to a cabinet with engines, failures are missing completely, the frame rate is bad, the start time of the APU is unrealistic, the FMC has problems and the flight behavior in the autopilot resembles a toddler sitting on the side stick. I’m sure there’s more, but I can’t list everything. To the individual points:

1: The flight behaviour is similar to a cabinet with engines:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sx-WEbQtyjM

2: the frame rate is bad:

The frame rate is above the PMDG 737. Great for the first time, but considering which system depth of the Airbus has, the frame rate would have to be over 60. In addition, the frame rate falls sharply in heavy situations (where much power is required), but only for a fraction of a second, in short, it lies. In the PMDG 737, the frame rate is continuously lower, but in such situations the frame rate remains stable, so that the FPS is low, but this is easy to play because there is no break-in.

3: the FMC has problems:

I keep hearing that the FMC is not serviceable, then it is serviceable, but it only mixes around, the route that calculates the FMC (LNAV and VNAV) are weak, wind is, as far as I know, completely ignored…

4: Autopilot resembles a toddler sitting on the sidestick

The autopilot is very strange when approaching. Sometimes the Airbus can approach an ILS, sometimes not. Then it goes back and forth, but it’s not on the runway. The Airbus is good for people looking at the FSX as a game. That’s enough if you can give gas and can brake, and it should look good. However, if you look at the FSX as a simulator and want to “play as real as it gets” the Airbus is completely out of place. In addition, the 40€ is too expensive. I’d have a bad conscience, I’d ask 10 for it. And beginners do not need a product that does not work, and is unrealistic, but a product that works, but is kept somewhat simpler. Or you just grab to the PMDG, you do.

LG,

I would probably have more time, but I hope that’s enough. Questions 🙂