Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
34 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
isilang
2 months ago

Everyone who feels thinks first. Makes the difference in feeling what you think or what you are deeply convinced of.

First the thought arises and then the feeling arises.

I do not agree with the statement.

isilang
2 months ago
Reply to  isilang

Thank you for the star ⭐

Nerdgirl82
2 months ago

That’s not true. One circumstance does not rule out the other, one can be happy if one judges with thought the same with feeling can be just as bad luck.

Christina168
2 months ago

That’s not true.

You think and feel in every state of feeling. Whether happy or sad.

Every feeling requires a thought that starts a process …

luserl
2 months ago

Not really, that varies from type to type. That’s my experience.

Some of them are happy, yet some are a little more, “headed” and others are not.

Neeuugiieerriig
2 months ago

The quotation simplifies strongly, but it contains a true core: happiness is often associated with intuitive feeling, while thinking is often accompanied by worries.

Satiharuu
2 months ago

Think IST doubt.

luserl
2 months ago
Reply to  Satiharuu

But does it mean to be happy not to be happy despite his doubts?

As long as I don’t doubt happiness, I can doubt living tomorrow, but still be happy today.

Or do I see it wrong?

FouLou
2 months ago
Reply to  Satiharuu

Thinking is more than that. If I’m planning a party, I have to think a lot. It has little to do with doubt.

Neeuugiieerriig
2 months ago
Reply to  Satiharuu

Sometimes.

luserl
2 months ago

Honestly, this with my mother is a cheerful board😂

Because of my own history, I’m not so sure, but mostly, yes. It doesn’t prevent me from being happy.

Satiharuu
2 months ago

Does it take 100%? Or are you unclear about it?

Do you accept that your mother is your mother?

Isn’t that 100% acceptance?

luserl
2 months ago

I accept the work and the money, but tolerate the circumstances that this entails or am aware of it in that it constitutes part of it.

Satiharuu
2 months ago

The question is if you are happy at the moment you doubt. Not?

How else do you want to answer the question?

100% acceptance is not available? Don’t you accept 100% that you get money for your work?

luserl
2 months ago

Is that lucky, not the absence of doubt? Bzw complete acceptance of the given?

Not for me. You need doubts to grow on you, that’s what leads to happiness. You can also doubt many things, but you can still be happy. Some people doubt, for example, our conception of the world and yet they can be happy in this.

There is no 100% acceptance, this is utopian. Happiness means to be 100% happy despite this unpredictable.

FouLou
2 months ago

Okay, I’ll go. That sounds quite clear.

Satiharuu
2 months ago

Is that lucky, not the absence of doubt? Bzw complete acceptance of the given?

Don’t say that doubt is always bad. Everything has its purpose.

luserl
2 months ago

Right.

Satiharuu
2 months ago

You plan by comparing. Doubts are a balance between two or more points of view.

Or you’d just make a party. Wouldn’t you doubt that it’s quite unplanned or inappropriate

Neeuugiieerriig
2 months ago

Being lucky can mean finding peace with yourself despite doubt. Doubts belong to thinking, but true happiness often arises when one accepts them instead of letting themselves be dominated by them.

Satiharuu
2 months ago

Yes. Bzw, to be happy, you have to feel

Try to be negative without thinking… Is that okay?

isilang
2 months ago
Reply to  Satiharuu

Happy is not to think without (before).

Satiharuu
2 months ago
Reply to  isilang

Sure? Then what is it?

isilang
2 months ago

The FS only asks for it. It doesn’t mean he’d see it like that.

I assume that because I have been dealing with such things for almost 4 decades.

But that would not even be necessary, because it is also to be explained in purely technical terms:

We think IMMER. If we don’t think anymore, we’re dead. It’s impossible not to think. This is even scientifically underpinned. Even if we try to move us mentally in “nothing” or quantum physics in the “zero-point field”, this represents a thinking process.

So every feeling must be based on a corresponding thought. We are not aware of each of our thoughts and many things are subconscious. But the thought was there first.

Satiharuu
2 months ago

Maybe. But you interpret that. Doesn’t mean that the questioner sees it like that, and not that one behind the quote.

The intessant question would be, why would you accept that?

isilang
2 months ago

I think, because the FS with the quotation at the same time puts the thesis in the room or wants to clarify whether it is true that (only) who is “happy” would feel (and do not think) and who is “unhappy” would just think (but do not feel).

“Whoever is happy feels. And who is unhappy thinks.”

Both think and feel. The difference in feeling makes the quality of thought.

Satiharuu
2 months ago

Okay, you’re right.

But that would not be a contradiction with the statement by the author

isilang
2 months ago

who feels happy thinks happy.

FouLou
2 months ago

It’s too vague. And it sounds a little like an excuse not to think.

I can’t really applicate it on a silly case. Or otherwise. it cannot be interpreted. It seems pretty meaningless to me.

Because it is obviously the lucky and unhappy human feelings and also think.

And depending on the person, the weighting will be different. There are people who are more emotional. They finally feel in positive suns or in negative feelings. And men are more head humans who take their feelings but they live less.

I do not see the meaning in the statement.

dvdfan
2 months ago

Maybe a little superficial, but already plausible.

I know people who are very happy. They’re right feeling people.

If I have problems as often as I am, then I am a lot more abominable than feeling.

steefi
2 months ago

No.

WayWayWayWay
2 months ago

No.

Jonathan123usw
2 months ago

It’s more like a cheap calendar spell

ohwehohach
2 months ago

No.