Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
56 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Googliesama
4 months ago

No, I don’t. The security distance is my security.

By the way, you can see much better if the road is free to overtake if you keep distance than if you stick directly to the bumper of the other.

The transition is also easier because you can already accelerate beforehand.

Gorkon193
4 months ago

Of course not, you hope to keep distance is always a duty otherwise it costs a fine.

Lufthannes
4 months ago

No, that would not only be stupid, but also dangerous.

Possibly a light horn, but densely opened is identical

peterobm
4 months ago

that would be foolish and criminal.

one keeps distance and overtakes if possible

it is also free to report

peterobm
4 months ago
Reply to  MaxBreifter

if he can explain it plausible, nö

Jessi16111611
3 months ago

Sometimes people go slower for a legitimate reason. Of course, this can be annoying, but honestly, much worse, I find people who go too close, that can end really stupid. Don’t get me wrong, I’m keeping at predetermined speeds, not too slow, not too fast. But if someone gets too close to me, I’ll adjust my speed to the distance, I’ll be slower, to my own safety, who should push over or live with it.

Authorized e reasons slower than allowed to drive for me, for example: difficult visibility, possibly. smooth, strong rain, fear of aqua planning, road with lots of wild change

Kerner
4 months ago

Hello,

in the 1980s, I did this as follows:

a little denser, show left and right with blinker and light horn,
and briefly activate the signal horn if necessary.

Just like you did at the rally.
Especially when the forerunner is “bready”.

But after I won a few points in Flensburg.
3 months in the fresh air was allowed to walk.

And some hundred marks were allowed to donate to the state fund,

without being able to put them down,

I prefer to glow at a reasonable distance,

and bite into my steering wheel.

Even if someone tries to push me.

Sometimes you can try to overtake.

Hansi

Jessi16111611
3 months ago
Reply to  Kerner

It is good that some people really learn from mistakes, with the punishments of us in road traffic still being too mild.

Kerner
3 months ago
Reply to  Jessi16111611

So, I’d say it.

Hansi

Elektroheizer
4 months ago

No, it doesn’t. Because such people usually don’t look into the back mirrors.

I’ll just overhear them if it’s possible. If it doesn’t and it gets too bad at some point, I’ll use one of the signaling devices. Villeicht is the driver asleep 😉

Andyy899398
4 months ago

Of course I don’t. One should always keep enough safety distance from the vehicle driving ahead in order to be able to brake in time if necessary.

WolfVonShinra
4 months ago

No. But if someone goes too close I put a danger brake because something went over the street that looked like a human ðŸ ̃‰

Timberwolf22868
2 months ago
Reply to  WolfVonShinra

However, it does not have to be that you drive through the city with 30 instead of 50, and thus impede traffic because you can never overtake it. Such people should be taken away from the rags. If they are too slow, they can also drive buses, which are not faster.

Insomnia12345
2 months ago

Of course not. Because I don’t know why he’s driving so slowly. Maybe there’s a reason for that.

And above all, the distance of security serves.

Frager1899
2 months ago

If 100 is allowed and the one that drives in front of a 50, one simply gets out on occasion.

Narva
4 months ago

No, I’m not sure. that’s stupid, so you can provoke an accident. I’m trying to overtake someone like that next safe way.

uhyrius
4 months ago

Nee, I’m a “sleeper” myself, and if someone goes up close, I’m slower, so the security distance is correct.

TheOddness
4 months ago
Reply to  uhyrius

Ever heard of “Break-Check”?

But I recommend only if you had a very bad day and the guy behind you goes too much on the nerves and you have nothing more to lose xD

uhyrius
4 months ago
Reply to  TheOddness

I didn’t know the word, but I’ve done it before, but only very rarely.

Wladimyr09
4 months ago
Reply to  uhyrius

How is that supposed to work? Can’t you count?

Thedj90309
4 months ago

On the highway I do this sometimes when the left lane does not drive down although the middle is free and have already ignored the light horn a few times.

peter2023239
4 months ago

I’m not going down.

nobodyathome
2 months ago

No I keep enough distance because I am standing up

Peter42
4 months ago

Ne – to them I even keep a lot of distance. Who knows what kind of ideas that still come like this: maybe a full-braking from the blue. So distance, the more the better.

TheOddness
4 months ago

Ne is Asi, you don’t know who’s in front of you and maybe there’s no reason

Stefan522
4 months ago

No, they’re overtaken with 340 horses. They’re supposed to continue.

Nordseefan
4 months ago
Reply to  MaxBreifter

I’ll bet you, if you’re too narrow to get over there, you can’t drive 100. It will also be too dangerous for intermediaries.

Nordseefan
4 months ago

Then it is likely to slow down the efficiencies. At least in phase. There is also something like driving with mind

LeBonyt
2 months ago

No. I’m not stupid. Then I’ll try to overtake them in a regular manner.

LeBonyt
2 months ago
Reply to  MaxBreifter

Then it is not possible to undermine the security abuse.

Zakalwe
4 months ago

No, I’m gonna let them go close behind me to show that they’re too fast.

Renate2511
4 months ago

Hi, MaxBreifter. 😊

Yeah, that’s annoying…..

You feel like they’re getting out and thinking they found a nice parking lot.

They could be pushed.

Sometimes I’m going tight, I’d rather be able to overtake a jerk…

Greetings, Renate. 😊

Renate2511
4 months ago
Reply to  MaxBreifter

Yeah, I…

Regilindis
4 months ago

I sympathise with you, I too!

opanobi
2 months ago

What do you want to do when they drive so close to one?

Nordseefan
4 months ago

No! Maybe he has a good reason.

TheAmigos
4 months ago

No, because that would be too dangerous to me

Singuli
4 months ago

No, that would be punishable.

Fraggle4685
4 months ago

No, that’s dangerous and stupid!

TheOddness
4 months ago
Reply to  Fraggle4685

That’s right

vogerlsalat
4 months ago

No, why should I and the other driver be in danger?

I’ll overtake as soon as it’s safe.

Singuli
4 months ago
Reply to  MaxBreifter

Always wonder if you’re faster when you get over.

Elektroheizer
4 months ago
Reply to  MaxBreifter

Yes in doubt there is nothing else left. But then you always have to weigh what’s more important. The time win or the point account.

spelman
4 months ago
Reply to  MaxBreifter

Yes, there is no right to 100km/h.

vogerlsalat
4 months ago
Reply to  MaxBreifter

Yeah, why not. What if he gets nervous before you and builds an accident or drives 70 instead of 50?

Singuli
4 months ago

You’re gonna hang before the next. Overtaking is only worthwhile if you have free ride afterwards.

PeterP58
4 months ago

No! I’m just overtaken!? o

PeterP58
4 months ago
Reply to  MaxBreifter

Then I light a cigarette and smoke cozy one! 🙂