Electron configurations?
Hello dear people,
So I have an equation like that and I can use it to explain some of the contradictions in our physics!
I discovered through my equation that everything microscopic follows the same rules as macroscopic.
When I compare a solar system with the periodic table I immediately notice the orbital problem of the electron configurations!
According to my reasoning, no two electrons can be in the same orbit, let alone 3 or 10….
11²=121, 111²=12321, 1111²=1234321
According to my mathematics and observations of the planetary system, there should not be more electrons there, but heavier ones.
For example, have you noticed that in all solar systems the heavy gas planets are always distributed centrally in the orbits of planets and never at the edge?
If several electrons were to use an orbital, they would collide, which can be deduced from observations of the planetary system.
So I ask you all quite cheekily: is the electron configuration of the periodic table wrong?
Are elementary orbitals really the same as planetary orbitals?
(3 votes)
Loading...
The chemical orbital model has nothing to do with the planet model. The celestial body is described with mechanical equations of motion – on the other hand, electrons are described with wave functions (which result as solutions of the Schröding equation).
An orbit/orbital path is a sharply defined track in the space – an orbital is, on the other hand, an area in the space in which electrons are to be found to a certain probability.
An atomic analogue to the planet model is the drill atom model. With this one can be e.g. the spectral lines of hydrogen, but for higher purposes (e.g. the explanation of the chemical bond) it is unsuitable and here the orbital model is instead the means of choice.
Ohh God Schrödinger….
The and Max Planck I am total opponent, sorry but the cats crate theory and probability that have been introduced by them have triggered this whole scepticism!
Newton and Einstein are right sorry!
The observer plays an important role in nature without a doubt, but a beeching bahre world on probabilities on building is already a little comic and unequivocal!
I don’t understand likelihood.
If you find them funny, nature doesn’t matter.
You tell me in principle that the microcosmos works by other rules and laws like Macrocosmos…
So I can’t understand…
Sorry.
PS: should this equation be recognized as a world formula lol😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 as a special student has recognized it and almost the entire science community has rejected it.
It’ll be fun!
Someone who doesn’t value title or money!
Someone who sees the true potential of development in skills and not in matter!
Pchem, was nice with you I now take break from good question point de.
This will be too much to say here to everyone, but a belief is the strongest one who believes in it.
And I am sure that our physical laws are not as correct as they represent it!
Technologically, it’s just the resonance!
Now I’m going to look for companies who are ready to conduct my equation experimentally on Exact Physical Units!
I’d like to see who one of you can make it that I don’t like rum and sadness…. My life with my family, dear…
That is, it is the duty and responsibility of a counting person to show the truth and make it accessible to all…
We are all responsible for each other….
I wish you a wonderful day and the next year is to be your year
Have you all loved who you sometimes have a little stubborn and narrow stiernig since!
Sorry we had a visit yesterday.
Look in nature, Energy 1 is all the other values below or above!
The mathematical superposition reflects the natural 1 to 1
1/0,0000099999+0,999992=1,00010000100001…
I prefer to write the numbers
10000000000/99999+999992=….
The result will be the same!
They say who action is equal to the reaction is temporally synchronic so there is a periodic impulse!
What has been identified as Higgsfeld field!
With a minimum displacement of the observer!
10000000000/(99999-1+999992)= 1,….
Do you know Fibonaccie?
1000000/999992= this is the smallest possible wave superposition increase is possible!
100000/99999-1= the largest possible waves overlay that is possible in nature.
A wave can not be bigger than the sum of its own!
This means that one wave plus the same wave is again the highest superposition state.
If you analyze these waves a little bit, you will notice that the Fibonaccie follows exactly middle between the proportional and square waves overlaying!
In the periodic system, each element has its own frequency which has a recurrent, a inertia for current flow, which is mathematically interpreted with this representation can
99999-1/999992= 9,99999999989999699995….
The wave is always weaker proportional to the distance, but with the value of inertia -1 you can imitate any reduction or gradient
With this representation I can tell you exactly how strong my signal on Mars will be, by correct interpretation of space and mathematical infinity, who I am sending it from here, still for the signal coming there!
I can make exact predictions with this representation on far away routes, as where my measuring instruments fail!
Weill the values are too small can only help us the mathematics!
Mathematics can calculate these values in the smallest room and signals are thus transmitted via speed of light and are braked to speed of light when receiving and are checked in terms of measurement!
Nature has no limits and by skating we will notice that the Higgsfeld does not exist!
From our perspective there is a Higgsfeld!
This is an optical deception!
The room has no limits!
The particles move so quickly that they exist everywhere in space at the same time from our perspective.
When two particles move equally fast at the same speed, they appear to be standing for each other, which indicates that the size of the particles in the dimension is even smaller!
Nature is Bipolar infinity according to Newton and this fit Perfect with the equation, observations, measurements and many other points.
Pchem, do your physics teachers or colleagues please complete with open questions!
This is the world formula looking for the Einstein, represented as a Universal Wave Law for Bipolar Open Systems!
Believe or not, I don’t care….
I would like more to whom you understand her and derive it on measurement data, how blind believes me!
Nature is exactly Berechenbahr.
You just need to know how!
I see what you mean, there are 2 nine in the denominator, and the result is the number 1 in every 2nd place. But what are you doing? On the one hand, this is not a new theory, and on the other hand it is quite impractical to show waves, since one can only represent wavelengths corresponding to natural numbers (1, 2, 3,…). What if the wavelength does not correspond to a natural number? That is, as in almost any real application?
It’s a nice number playing, but it’s the existence of Perpetua mobilia to derive from it or to dismiss quantum physics as a false one, it’s still unstoppable.
Yes I can simulate all three of them and intertwine the phase shift!
However, the algebraic function has the weaker that it shows a wave but for this it has more exact prediction than an Oszil Weill it only refers to measurement data and has measurement tolerances.
Look the supplement to the question only for you Pchem 😁
Because you are open and know how a spiritual duel should look!
I’ll add a few more waves of mudulations to show you the one we can’t explain so easily with sinus or tangent functions!
Must make Parralel a few more things but let me surprise you 🫣
I just input the waves in the Oszi simulation, which are all three periodicals
Can you hang the picture to question lol
Periodic waves can be represented by algebraic!
10/9=1,11111111111111
With the number of 9ners you can determine their wave width!
100/99 = 1,0101010101
You can vary the amplitudes of the Kehwert number!
With the equation, waves are interesting that do not behave periodically and their prediction on long periods and distances are interresant.
99/98=1,0204081632652. …
For example, here the superposition at the 64 to 65….
Periodic waves are boring!
I put the picture in addition to your specification as a question supplemented!
Can you model with your equation a), b) and c)?
The current physics is similar to your probabilities with religions!
Well, how would you “model” the following waves with your equation?
a) y = 2 • sin(x + 5)
b) y = 4 • sin(x + 3)
c) y = 2 • sin(x + 5) + 4 • sin(x + 3)
As I said, energy conservation set with supplement of the Third Newtic Law!
Not that of thermodynamics.
Thermodynamics refers to closed systems!
Nature is a bipolar open system!
Wen Action Equally strongly the reaction is in the reverse direction temporally synchronized can be displayed with loads!
←←→ or so →→←.
Due to the fact that the same fast loading in the same direction of silence will result in the observer a temporal asynchronity between shareholder Kraft and reactionary force.
←→ or so →←
Are you familiar with this pattern with the Up and Down Quarks?
Due to the temporal asynchronity, the action has other space and speed characteristics like the reaction!
Two Open Systems Exchange At the same time energy back and forth forever!
In response to their observers!
Try the equation I sent you and you might understand it!
Not in vain it follows the Fibonaccie, built on the proportionality square law.
In her investigation I found that each wave with her modeling can and she describes a universal wave law!
Do you call an element that has no own frequency?
An element that is not subject to any magnetic alternating action?
Who does not destroy energy and will not be created can it be seen as a cosmological constant!
Thus, the interaction between protons and electrons or thermal baths and spatial curvature is infinite and the endurance is caused by the temporal asynchronousity of the observer!
On Stroposcopic Doppler observations it is possible to take back that nature is divided into temporally dense and sections!
That’s what she’s infinity Perpetuum….
The mobile doesn’t believe who one builds what is a balance of these forces to the observer!
You’re looking for why it doesn’t work in your theories and thoughts!
But instead of adapting the theories to questions and observations, since their feast convinced them!
I’m glad you came to this knowledge. In your other post you defended the existence of Perpetua mobilia…
Both the microscopic and the macroscopic follow the energy conservation set!
Not that of thermodynamics!
In addition to the third Newtisches Act!
Jaaaa and you know what nature doesn’t care and what not 😅.
So I know nature has a law for all of us!
God doesn’t throw brother!
Whatever the others will answer is wrong insofar as the geometry of the current model of conception is based on a four-dimensional geometry, but is often calculated and assessed only three-dimensionally.
Partly this is taken into account, but not complete. Thus, for example, the time dilatation basically follows a four-dimensional model, but the assessment of what would be correct or wrong is assessed exclusively under three-dimensionally conceivable criteria, but calculated in 4D.
But here on good question.de it is not possible to explain such complex relationships, because this medium is absolutely inappropriate to explain it here. The text of the answer is limited and, for example, the simplest graphic possibilities such as animated GIF images that could illustrate the text differentially geometrically.
This assumption is therefore wrong, because they can obviously superposition from the 3D perspective, because they are located in a 4D environment, where they are always located next to each other in reality, etc.
Complex equations 😅
You’re going from a Higgsfeld as a super position!
Question to you seem Moved objects Silent for each other who they move in the same direction immediately?
With the fourth dimension, Einstein simply implicates the movement to solid bodies!
When you move at the same speed as an atom, other atoms appear still!
They’ll come to you like plannets.
And it’ll go infinitely small again!
And infinitely great!
The Higgsfeld is an optical deception Weill moving particles extremely fast they appear to exist everywhere in the whole room!
They do this from our perspective!
But not from their own perspective!
The atom model is simply not quite right!
The masses must be more and not number of electrons that says my waves equation for bipolar open systems!
Jesus Christ, what a wonderful imagination you have, and with that you are superior to me, who considers himself an absolutely sloping cross-bearer. It is therefore not possible for me to reply reasonably to so much mischief.
To say that all others are wrong sounds very like a conviction and no actual review of their information!
My text is the same as your comment.
I’m not saying you’re all wrong!
But that you keep the right thing through too many definitions Need complex and thereby causes false *interpretations of a bipolar open system!
Many things are right and I build a new theory on these real things!
Make your invented powers to arrange the right units and Woala World Formula is there
I did not invent them but only endect and correctly interpreted in combination with the energy conservation sentence and the third Newtic law with the time dilation of relativity theory!
Stay with your 1000 units and complexity!
But if you can’t tell a child, you don’t understand it yourself!
No the period system and the electron configurations therein are correct. It is almost general knowledge that particles in the microscopic also act like waves and also vice versa (wave parts dualism).
And according to current state of knowledge, e.g. Electrons distributed in atoms with probabilities whose probability of residence is indicated by the orbitals. Super many devices are based on quantum mechanics and the power of these laws is virtually unchallenged.
It’s better!
Quantum computers are only possible on information transfer via speed of light!
If one analyzes the dynamic behavior of light one will notice that it follows the proportionality square law!
The force of a charge will always increase in square or weaken depending on the proportional space change!
This isn’t gonna happen suddenly in a higgs field….
And from there, back to probabilities?
Infinitely proportional in square! Big too small!
For the first statement I can say nix.
Secondly, do you mean the coulomb sourcing that the force is proportional to 1/r^2? This would then be indirectly proportional.
With the Higgsfeld, I know too little to say when it dissolves. I thought it was a constant field that gives all the particles its mass.
Why don’t you describe your equation, which explains some contradictions of physics that you mentioned in your question. That would help to understand what you actually did. But I think it’s almost impossible for what you say to be true
The position of the electrons is not so exact!
When you look at the orbitals of an element, Dan are built like the planets orbitals.
The gas giants are always centralized in the planets, exactly where most electrons are in the electron configuration or even the highest potency is in a period 1 quadrature 111112 = 123454321.
Who the equation of me is correct is one electron per orbital and they have different weights per orbital and no more electrons.
The Third Newtic Act says that each action is an equally strong reaction to each other only in synchronism with time.
This rule describes a perfect symetry, although the observer perceives his own frequency as a harmonic instead, the interactions are subject to principles of a temporal asynchronity to the own charge of the observer.
The temporal asynchronism that is true by the observer ensures different space and speed characteristics between action and reaction, which is why one runs in 2 squares and the other linear.
999…= Action 999…= Reaction timely synchronous
999…-1 Action 999…2 = Reaction of temporal asynchronity caused by the observer -1.
We can determine the position of the electron quite accurately. Or what do you mean that the electrons take the position too short and therefore appear wave-shaped to us?
To the equation, that’s no equation, that’s just numbers where the 9 stands for one revolution per time, so speed? Huh? Give me the right equation.
And how does the third newtonian axiom play in now??
No the Higgsfeld appears for us instead Weill just moving particles very quickly!
But they take too short the position that we can measure them for this reason the image distorted waves is shaped.
So the proportionality square law is to be found in both magnetism and gravitation!
Electric Static Charges Curves the water jet Eben and Flood is the same phenomen that is explained with gravitation!
The natural space is the same as the mathematical.
In the equation, you can model each wave width with the Neuners and analyze the potencies in the solution the effect of the rotation impulse forces….
1000000…(999…-1+999…2)=1,000…1000…2000…3000…5000…8000…1300…
Every nine is united in a certain time as per revolution!
The time unit can be assimilated per minute per hour or second.
They must be written for the third Newtischesgesetz Parralel.
With the -1 you can vary the inertia.
The Equation Shows an osziloscope with infinite measurement rich 😉🫡
From the heart for peace!
I think this is a little different and move in shells and not gear exactly on one track and at their speed they create a negative space rather than negative rows. It’s not the case with planets.
If you understand what I mean and if I understood what you mean 👈
According to measurements and observations, they are rather economically distributed.
You have lanes but move so fast that you can hardly arrange them a fixed position!
The sound model with its number came from quantum mechanics through the probability of their positions.
If it’s not quite wrong, the pattern is already correct, but the electrons should be heavier central and no longer.
This is just a model model model representation
Accelerate a planetary system and this will also happen to you as to whom the planets make sound around the sun!