Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Spikeman197
2 years ago

Most fur animals have a short and pathetic life…

Most of the leather is obtained from cattle, which are kept in mass anyway. They are not as good as they are, but they fulfill more than one ‘shock’ and must also be healthy over a longer period.

catxy
2 years ago

There is a lot of animal suffering in leather. Unfortunately, industrial mass production always causes animal suffering. As I stand on leather, I buy leather products second hand. This is sometimes difficult for shoes – but it is feasible.

ZvezdaBrate
2 years ago

The same is true.

Except it’s vague. Snakes or crocodile leather.

asdfjkll
2 years ago

Fur is not necessarily bad. For example, fox fur and fur of rabbits and canine chemicals would be fur species which are in any case produced as a by-product and are currently being thrown away because breeding dog fur is much cheaper. No animal would suffer for the use of these furs obtained by wild animals but the processing is expensive. The circumstances under which breeding dog fur is won are, however, disgusting for it is nice cheap, even cheaper than art fur. It’s similar to leather. Leather obtained in Europe is usually a by-product. Most leather, however, is manufactured in countries like Pakistan udgl as the main product, where animal welfare is simply no matter. You can never flatter the use of animals in general.

Nicoztz
2 years ago

Fur is critical yes also cattle are often badly kept but fur animals have it more intensely

And when an animal is slaughtered, why not use all that goes like the cow from which most leather comes

josua1942
2 years ago

Using hides from dead animals is morally acceptable. Animals improperly to breed and to ” torture” but not.