Hello,
The bid is 291.00 euros
The detailed description states that this is only the original packaging. I'm just curious if the highest bidder can request a refund after receiving the item. I mean, if the bidders don't read the description, then the purchase is legally acceptable. What I don't understand is why the seller doesn't clarify this.
(1 votes)
Loading...https://www.momox.at/kleid-verkaufen/
My mother would allow me, as a minor, to order something from Amazon. However, she is not allowed to order anything from Amazon because of an ad that was returned. So can I still order something from Amazon with my mother's permission? Or is that not possible because your report was returned?
Is it true that if you order something used from Amazon's warehouse, the item must not have been used for longer than 30 days, since all new items can only be returned within 30 days?
On the Mediamarkt website you can find the Quest 3 for 520 € on Amazon it costs 630 € I now know some people who advise me not to buy from Mediamarkt because they apparently resell returned products and so on. what is your opinion on this?
Hello, As I was checking my Klarna app to see which bills I still had outstanding, I suddenly noticed something strange next to one of them. It says the payment failed and I have to pay before October 22nd. I ordered something on account. However, I don't understand where this is coming from, because I…
Hello folks, Is eBay even worthwhile for commercial use and not for small businesses? If I understand correctly, eBay takes €11 for a product that costs, say, €100, and the tax office takes €19. That means €70 remains for my product, and I want to be profitable, too… Is this calculation correct or what is…
The seller will have problems:
https://www.ebay.de/sch/i.html?_dkr=1&iconV2Request=true&_blrs=recall_filtering&_ssn=dampf_2&_oac=1&LH_Complete=1
However, if you buy based on the reviews:
# https://www.ebay.de/fdbk/feedback_profile/dampf_2?filter=feedback_page%3ARECEIVED_AS_SELLER&sort=TIME
is somehow to blame.
What's more, this fraudulent seller creates false impressions with a starting price of EUR 29.00:
https://www.ebay.de/bfl/viewbids/155808720793?item=155808720793&rt=nc&_trksid=p3458402.m145235.l2565
I won't report anything. I'd rather have civil lawsuits and claims be filed.
If he had written above
>Selling Playstation 5 console in original packaging<
Then at least that would have been obvious.
I meant >Selling Playstation 5 empty box< That would have been correct.
No.
He can open a buyer protection case , which eBay will then decide on .
And then it depends on the category in which the retailer has placed the packaging.
That's what he does:
And a Biter should be able to read.
The seller has categorized the item as Playstation 5 packaging and Playstation 5. Okay, but that doesn't change the fact that some people don't read the item description.
But that is their problem.
Oh well ,
You should read more than just the first small section of a product description…
Since many (but not all) people are becoming increasingly lazy and also increasingly inattentive, it is one's own fault if one is ultimately too lazy to read only the first of 2-3 short sentences, or perhaps not even the first one…
Too bad you didn't include the link. But I found the offer:
https://www.ebay.de/itm/155808720793?hash=item2446ec6799:g:ncgAAOSwejplHA0-&amdata=enc%3AAQAIAAABAK65Byyz6kKG7UOZnVDISKaa7 ONJT9areteoceFSNv8o57I7gaAO3QcX1bos6YQn5jFX7JeUWS7culqqgDWtBagtw%2Fzs%2FCpS6oJL0TJa8u7j2cRuVHDwQTRUnrGG0C6nfN6qsStxdRfD3iE 4SVUW6Uy%2B0QgbjOMcMCW4kr85ADfqHHpC4S%2F08ahcgjCHutw7a6oIplNRdYC9vtSuNarOO7fk25QsqlisBqYQEuQCuA%2FxAPqrNB1Fz%2BHJE2TmLBSeF iWJ17WRyoctvPCxcfjAbSfePNiz2Il6SnJajpoCJF%2FQ%2BsL%2FTPCH1SJulQ%2FE%2FvzgZVDToIKBAt7h4%2Fm6XZVgB6Y%3D%7Ctkp%3ABFBM9LPrm99i
The headline is ambiguous because it's misleading due to the words simply strung together. It should have been either "Sony PS5 Blu-Ray Edition with/in the original packaging " or "Original packaging for the Sony PS5 Blu-Ray Edition ."
The category is 'Consoles', so the PS5 should be offered.
The PS5 is listed under the item features, so it should be that again.
Only in the text does it say that only the packaging is offered.
Either the provider was too stupid to use understandable German, or he deliberately expressed himself ambiguously.
You can always do that. It's unknown how eBay would decide in this case.
Clearly wrong category, I've reported it. 😎
I can't judge whether the seller intentionally placed the offer like this. In my opinion, the text in the offer is misleading and not informative. It's good that you reported it.
Mal sehen, was draus wird.
Ach, vielleicht wird er zivilrechtlich verklagt,. Dem Vogel gönne ich jedes Urteil:
https://www.123recht.de/100h-Sozialarbeit-fuer-Leeren-Karton-__f59673.html
Reviews are removed if no new positive ones are added within 12 months, which explains the terrible profile.
But you're right, transparency is something different.
Das sind nur die Bewertungen der letzten 12 Monate. Insgesamt gibt es 35 Bewertungen. 34 positive, eine negative.
It's about the percentage of 50% .
And eBay won’t be standing by much longer.
You know this one?
Well, it got 35 reviews, but the last one was bad.
By the way, I also find the way eBay displays the reviews bad. At first glance, you only see 7. After the username, there's 24, so he's received 24 reviews. If you click on 'all reviews received,' 35 are displayed.
eBay, what's that about?
With the terrible profile, this could break the VK’s neck:
https://www.ebay.de/fdbk/feedback_profile/dampf_2?filter=feedback_page%3ARECEIVED_AS_SELLER&sort=TIME
The headline already says it's the packaging. Anyone willing to spend that much on it has only themselves to blame.
No. The headline also states that it's the PS5.
No, it says that this is the original packaging of the device.
Finally, one more specific note. The seller has listed the Playstation 5 empty box under the Playstation 5 console category. This is incorrect, as there is a separate section for empty boxes on eBay.
Regarding the first part, I agree with you that it was expressed that way intentionally.
I see it differently.
Yes, that would be perfect if it were written like that. But then people who can no longer understand, read, or write correctly wouldn't fall for it so easily.
We agree that the number is bad, but linguistically it is fine as it is and in no way implies that it is about the device itself.
If the packaging were meant, it would have to say 'Original packaging for PS5'.
That's not right. Terms need to be read in context. That's why I find it so difficult when everyone reads and writes only in short, choppy terms and with incorrect terminology. This way, language is no longer perceived correctly.
The seller here is taking advantage of exactly that.
If a PS5 were meant, it would say "in original packaging" or "originally packaged".
Correct. It also says that it's the PS5. It doesn't say what the connection is between the two terms.