Does it make sense to only have riding lessons once or twice a month and otherwise ride alone?

Hello, horses/riding have been my great passion for 20 years (I'm 25 now), but unfortunately I'm not blessed with a lot of money.

From 2005 to 2018, I rode once or twice a week in riding lessons and competed in dressage at E-level and show jumping, originally up to about 115m. However, I haven't jumped since 2015, as I didn't have the opportunity to jump on school horses after that, and I've only ridden dressage since then.
Then, due to time constraints and frustration with poor riding schools, I didn't ride at all in 2019 and 2020.

In 2021, I started a RB on a PRE mare with health issues and a 30-year-old Thoroughbred mare. The former died last year, and the latter retired completely in January. I mostly rode alone and occasionally had lessons with the owner's trainer when she couldn't make it.

Since February, I've had a riding license on a friend's Isi. I can ride the pony cross-country and also do dressage in an arena. He's well-trained for an Isi, but he doesn't have much "go." The owner and stable team are excellent, and I like the horse's character. Lessons are not possible.

I've been so dissatisfied with my riding lately. No lessons, no warmbloods/thoroughbreds (I can understand others' love for the Isi 0 breed), and I haven't been able to do any jumping for 10 years.

But I currently have a maximum of €80/month. Do you think it would be better to look for a new riding instructor with a maximum of €80 on a warmblood, but then only ride for myself and no lessons? Or should I keep my current riding instructor (I currently pay €0 and in return I help out in the stable) and then also have jumping lessons 1-2 times a month, or a couple of dressage lessons and then jumping at a riding school on school horses? The question is, does it make sense to have lessons only 1-2 times a month (but then I would still have dressage on the Isi once a week at the same time without lessons), or can I just leave it and get a new riding instructor without lessons? And would a riding school be willing to do that, or would they say I have to come every week.
What would you do?

2 votes, average: 2.00 out of 1 (2 rating, 2 votes, rated)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...
Subscribe
Notify of
23 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Punkgirl512
7 months ago

There's something to do if you're able to work after class. For many years, I've only had lessons every 2 weeks, because I'm on the ground and my trainer wasn't more often in our area.

Aaaber, I always rode the same horse, mine.

I'm here with the others: I don't think Isis will make you happy in the long term. Look around for another horse, which fits better.

I am also full of the fact that dressage is now the basis. This is less about lessons, more km of communication, which is especially elementary when jumping.

Hjalti
7 months ago

Yeah, basically, that makes sense. Mostly, if you ride on your own and further refine/finish what you did in class.

Anyway, I've read out now that you're mainly about jumping – that's probably not going to be too late with the Isi.

Another short set for dressage: this is the basis! If you don't, you'll break horses. The dressage makes the balance, the suppleness, the strength, the speed, which riding horses and especially also spring horses need. And for the rider just when jumping is THE means of communication with the horse.

Urlewas
7 months ago

So first of all, if the Icelandic horses don't lie to you, and if you have to ask the pony, I'd probably also look for something else. Dressage riding in the long term without teaching is uninteresting anyway, especially since your training seems quite questionable. Riding on E level and jumping 1.15 does not fit together. Sounds irresponsible.
So I'd definitely take care of reasonable dressage lessons. Once is better than no time.
No one knows what it looks like in the local riding schools in your area. But sometimes it is possible to introduce yourself as a “stopgap” by asking again and again (especially when vacations are), whether someone else fails and so sporadically gets one or other riding lesson.
Or you're lucky that you'll find a warm-or full blood, whose owner doesn't pay for the money, but who's just happy when you move the horse reliably (and get away) and invest your money in lessons on this horse.
in short: in order to get clarity what you want to do, you have to explore your possibilities properly.

lynnmary1987
7 months ago
Reply to  RaketeRoland

Sorry, but if the dressage doesn't sit, you shouldn't jump. And yes, to do that. I can't jump a horse if I'm not able to do its step length correctly before jumping off, or to have its line exactly where I need it. And yes, you can't do that without proper dressing.

In addition, no horse stays healthy when jumping if there is not enough gymnast and yes, correct dressage is absolutely necessary.

Urlewas
7 months ago

Why now so aggressive against lynnmary? And why exaggerate? Sorry, but you're not 13 anymore.
You wrote yourself that you ride on E level. Of course, no one here saw you ride, but if you judge yourself, what do you expect?
And apologise – but if you jump to L – level (DU speaks of 1.15 m!) you should also be able to ride on A, better L – level dressage. From M – Dressage, let alone Piaffe, no one ever spoke. 🤗

If you want, we also like to try to explain to you what it has on itself 😉

Do you know what show jumpers usually do 5-6 days a week? You train dressage work! It is therefore in fact unrealistic to participate in jumping hours at 1-2 riding hours a month. In order to jump to more than E level, you should also be able to gymnastize the horse accordingly in order, for example, to not just brake a horny horse, but to be able to record it correctly. The E dressage rider usually does not really understand the difference yet, let alone that he could implement it.

All right? Unpack peace pipe? 😉

Urlewas
7 months ago

Thank you.

lynnmary1987
7 months ago

Isis can also be very good in dressage if you can also train them accordingly and work on them regularly. Why should "school not be possible"? The only reason is that she doesn't want the owner. In that case, you should look for another RB because with an owner who doesn't want you to continue to train yourself and the horse… I don't know.

Otherwise, look for a trainer who comes to you. And yes, if he only comes twice a month, then you just get ahead at the snail pace. But one develops at least rarely backwards.

The same applies even if you take fewer lessons than you do.

Urlewas
7 months ago
Reply to  RaketeRoland

That sounds quite strange. I am also “English” on my way, but I am open to other riding methods. My visits to Icelandic farms usually did not give such an extremely strange lead. It doesn't surprise me if your pony is rather unmotivated, with this self-willing training method. Unmotivated If I were a rider in such circumstances – and would be more suitable for me.

Urlewas
7 months ago

Ankles, depending on anatomy a maximum of one hole longer, have the straps at the correct dressage seat. Even shorter then for the light seat (spinning, terrain…)

lynnmary1987
7 months ago

Find another RB

There's nothing like you.

lynnmary1987
7 months ago

The light truss without a bow should NOT lead to clamping the knees… even if it is such a puffy solution

It should actually convey to the whip student that he should not get active at all and therefore does not need anything he can get up from.

you should come up by yourself from the horse movement.

What makes the rider active is to sit back correctly instead of dropping down and yes, that goes without a bow and even without turning the knees into a laundry glow.

Urlewas
7 months ago

That the temples are longer is clear. But if you don't have them for light wear, you could also ride without riding…and the light truss without a bow is no longer done today because it is completely counterproductive. In the past, this was only such a nuisance that leads to the clamping of the knees, which in turn prevents the looseness of horse and rider.

lynnmary1987
7 months ago

The reins are not present in the Tölt only if you have already arrived at the "stuffing". But I don't read the approach between the lines.

And yes, the stirrups are somewhat longer than the average English rider is used. But contact is still there. But whoever can't easily wear light without a stirrup… he can't wear light.

Urlewas
7 months ago

It's the other extreme.

I was allowed to try the Tölten (also worked) after I was able to show chewing exercises on the standing horse, nicely riddled corners and a horse with leg-smooths that was tied to the hand. The Tölt was triggered similarly to the assembled Trot. From that point of view, I do not see how this can be done with missing reins. But good if people are happy… let them do. You don't have to mix everywhere. 😉

Keks37
7 months ago

Well, look at how hard you do what you're supposed to do as a homework from the riding class. You get slower, but if you don't have more money, what do you want to do?

Within the scope of his possibilities, you should look at what is feasible and whether you have to jump forcibly or whether it may be just dressage classes