Do you think Michael Jackson would have given a good performance in This Is It as usual?

Question

dersebbi · Answer

Unprobably, this was quite weakened by drug dependence. It was also said from the outset that the concerts that had not been announced had also been taken place.

ytimoyt · Answer

Once what @DerSebbi writes, Michael was already a bit older and you can also see the samples, the choreographers were no longer as "wild" as they were.

finisterrae · Answer

in the course of the 1990s, performance has already been significantly reduced. History in Munich 97 was still great, but no comparison with Dangerous or the 80s.

If you look at the workload of the history tour, you can only pull the hat. Basically hopping from concert to concert. High performance sports.

djtildawn · Answer

With the help of the documentary it is possible to understand how much work and perfectionism he has still put to the day. This, in combination with some of the best musicians, dancers and technicians, would certainly have resulted in a world-class show.

gutschma · Answer

A good performance? 100%

Like usual? He was 50 years old from This Is It. Between his last tour and TII are over 10 years. Because of his age he could not have had the same performance as his 10 years younger I.

However, it would have been a good performance, as you can see in the samples for TII. In addition, it is necessary to remember that MJ has only moved as much as necessary during samples for shows and that the focus was rather on everything else. He usually only performs when the shows actually arrived. Therefore, the TII samples do not even reflect the performance he would have actually given in the shows.

He would not have had 50+ concerts, but only the 10 concerts he had originally played, that would have been completely feasible.