Do you recognize an erotic/sexual connotation in the following text (see below)?
The question below was whether you had ever tried to bribe a police officer.
Text:
Yes, with a donut, didn't work :-D. (The cop was off duty and I wanted to get him to let me win at the game ;-)).
The question that arises for me is: am I missing something that could suggest something erotic, or is someone just fantasizing about it in a very strange way?
Hello.
Although the kind of bribe of a policeman and the goal (to win in games thanks to bribe) are already unusual, I lack any connection to something erotic or sexual.
LG
gufrastella
Lach, I've got a policewoman in the circle of friends 🙂 and, as always, who manages to win very often with Mario Kart – so that's not so unusual;-).
Very nice! My thoughts were: Standard reason: offense, standard drug money or sex.
Very clear.
Yes, on the one hand, I would not be so stupid to try and on the other hand, I would not be so stupid to admit that on the other hand.
You have to Extreme think jago-driven and forcefully put it on to reinterpret something sexual.
I get the highest hunger when reading. With me the bribe would have worked guaranteed…😂
;-). Then I wish you a man who tries to bribe you with a donut ;-).
No
I don't know that inside
rubber ball
No, no sexual reference can be derived directly from the text.
But as emoji can stand in sexual context like sexting the donut for any hole in the body. But this is extremely far-fetched here as an appeal.
Nope. And I usually get to know that.
But it must somehow be explained that a doubt has a hole, as far as I could.
Okay, I thought about the word "lubble" – but I hadn't had any connection with "hole"…
God, hopefully I don't have to think of such a stuff in the harmless examples of donuts…
And "bribery" might also play a role.
Only with a lot of imagination… so no, no more.
What's a connotation?
A meaning that goes along. So if something is not said directly, but the text gives the reader a connection or a certain impression is awakened.
No, I don't see.
But apparently there are people who only think with the part between the legs.
Well, then that's true with my assessment, but since I personally tend to overlook sexual attacks (also existing ones), I wanted to get other opinions on it.