Similar Posts
Why is the accusative case followed by "without" but the dative case followed by "with"?
Example: "without black dot", but: "with black dot". That doesn't make any sense, even if my linguistic instinct tells me otherwise. "Without" and "with" serve the same function in a sentence and represent the exact opposite of each other… That's totally irregular, I don't understand it….
Is my example correct: this one?
Bymusa024
This difficult question baffled him? This difficult question left him speechless (surprised)?
Lifestyle in 1900?
What is the socio-political situation and the attitude to life of the people around 1900
I think we all understand that German is not your native language and that you are more German.
Couldn’t you do your homework / exercises on your own and set a proposal here in the forum? We would then correct him.
This is an excellent idea! Thank you.
Stop fucking
Don’t be cursed. You’re always asking, and that’s still in extremely rude tone.
You can say of luck that most of us FB are very patient people and usually help you, although you don’t know how to behave well. Are you acting so unhealthy about your teacher and your fellow students?
In a group, for example, the mood can be heated by calling hetzparolen and firing people.
one more?