Do you also think that people are the worst thing ever?
I am vegetarian and well on my way to becoming vegan.
Humans simply destroy everything they can get their hands on. I hope that someday (soon) all humans will die out and the animals can make up for everything we've taken from them. We've ruined everything, and it will probably never get better because the end is near anyway with climate change.
I also have the feeling that many people simply don't want it to be true and don't take the situation on Earth seriously.
I believe the main problem is a lack of empathy in today's generations (but also in past ones).
What do you say about that?
(6 rating, 6 votes, rated)You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...
The human being as a kind behaves just like any other species if they would get the chance to switch and wrestle without feeding the enemy.
Yes our interventions in nature are more durable than those of beaver, termite or ant – but nothing else.
We're not better or worse. We were only lucky to have fallen out of the food network.
I think we're worse.
• take animals and keep them for us/kill them (and it is a difference when an animal eats another to us who kill them in masses)
• destroy nature (have you ever seen an animal overcrow huge areas?)
• no respect for other beings, we think we are the most important
Ants also hold cattle.
Look at algae. You can suffocate whole seabeds.
Every kind of thing only cares about their own survival. Walnut trees kill everything they want to grow around.
That's what I see. The human being is trying to make this planet uninhabitable and to eradicate itself (with which I personally would not have a problem). I hope the latter arrives first so that the remaining flora and fauna can recover and the planet and its inhabitants can continue to exist without the threat of such a terrible species as humans. The decisive point in the course of evolution is, in my opinion, the moment when people became sedentary and began to operate livestock farming, agriculture, etc. Everything started with more-take-as-used and more-take-as-giving. But if there is no climate change, the AI will probably/hopefully give the rest to man and destroy him, a quite realistic scenario that could already occur in the near future and which is very beautifully illustrated in the film "Atlas" with Jennifer Lopez.
LG from Berlin
The AI is not necessarily better for nature. I see AI very critically and wished one would deal more cautiously with the whole subject, the euphoria to transfer all possible tasks to AI I do not understand. In my opinion, there is much too much energy in there, I personally do not want robots to run around in my house and do any housework, because they do not think they can make it as satisfying as I imagine I am someone who pays attention to very many small things. At the moment an AI is not yet able to make it clear that can change in the foreseeable time, but as I said, I find it completely unnecessary. We should take care of how we can live sustainably so that nature can finally recover again, including a more sustainable economy that does not rely on increasing growth.
All of them would have to do without meat. Electricity, hot water, heating, cars, internet and not everything.
No one will miss out on this luxury and so it continues until finally everything has been destroyed.
But you could be very restrained in many things
But no one wants to start and screw down the acquired standard.
That would be forgotten, but no one does. They talk a lot and look for mud like this advertisement we are supposed to plant trees. Bullshit if they'll be deforestation anyway.
I guess we're all gonna get the animals. Best almost
Well, that's the problem. That's why we can only hope for the fall 🙂
Of course only the people
So looks like 🙂
But the implementation is not meant seriously. So change something to make it really better. I plant my little tree and they spray their poison with airplanes, cars garbage and not everything. Anyway, my little tree will die again or be made to firewood.
Better than leaving anything to chance, don't you think? More trees do no harm 😉
Yeah, I'd agree.
Did your parents or grandparents have sex to destroy the earth? Do mice or rats have sex to hurt people?
I'll take you to die out
I'll take one? Anything missing? Point, comma?
Sorry 😁, that is, of course, I assume
the most shameful I find plastic or non-degradable elements. as a person you can easily avoid them, but animals are unfortunately helpless. in front of sea.
I'm right. For products that can be used for a long time or always, I would rather use plastic because otherwise trees have to be wooded. In small things like packaging that are thrown away anyway plastic is not recommended
yes, but there is a thing that is positive. a small majority has already checked that New Year's Eve is completely pointless. in my big city, the more boiled in side streets has decreased to 95%.
We will certainly not be able to do this, but sooner or later the earth of its parasite will be removed.
Great attitude.
Congratulations.
Human contempt has always helped. Why exactly should people actually behave appropriately when they are perceived like the last of all?
Typical pygmalion effect: you will find confirmation for your way of thinking everywhere. As you interpret the world, you see it.
Only: you can't get it. You don't make the world better. It's plump, comfortable, and you'll stay alone with it. This does not help any animal welfare.
LG of someone who lives mostly vegan with his girlfriend.
Well, if the attitude remains with everyone, it's not a miracle!
No, and I don't want them to die.
In your place, I would remove from this misanthropic ideology, which sees everything negative and only the fall, but itself does nothing productive to tackle the problem. The CO2 emissions in Western countries have been falling steadily for years, there are obviously progress.
Hopefully, did you do exactly to meet all the nutrients? If you're under 18, you can't afford malnutrition because the damage would remain.
There have already been numerous disruptive developments without human beings, which have "destroyed" the Earth at the time. One only thinks of the green beings that have produced oxygen and were thus responsible for mass extinction of the anaerobic beings.
You complain about the lack of empathy and appeal to people's morals.
At the same time, you hope for the soon extinction of humanity.
People are the only species capable of morality at all.
So, because of your moral ideas, you're asking something that brings an end to morality at all.
Think about it again.
I don't know what morality means, I don't understand. I'm suing people because he ruined everything, and I hope that's why he's bullying. I don't see anymore
Yes, brilliant. Your answer has something. I can't believe it.
People are getting more stupid, you're right!