Diese Frage wurde wahrscheinlich schon öfter gestellt, aber wieso gibt es keine Fallschirme in Passagier Flugzeugen (ob große oder kleinere Flieger)?
Mir ist natürlich klar das bei gewissen höhen und der hohen geschwindigkeiten ein sicherer Absprung unmöglich ist wegen dem Druck die Kälte usw. Im Flugzeug gibt es auch Schwimmwesten in größeren auch Rettungsinseln warum dann nicht Fallschirme? Wäre es nicht noch sicherer für Passagiere wenn sie einen Vorteil mehr hätten. Vor & während des zweiten Weltkrieges hatten die alierten auch vereinfachte Fallschirme, durch die Jahre und der neuen Technik wäre es ja möglich einfache Fallschirme zu entwickeln die per GPS, Höhenmessung von alleine aufgehen. Das es für die Passagiere noch einfacher wird, denn mit großer Sicherheit haben die “meisten” Passagiere noch nie einen Fallschirm absolviert noch dazu einen solo Sprung. Im Militär Bereich wird hart dafür trainiert genau so wie früher im Krieg. Trotzdem wenn es nur 1% gäbe um Leben zu retten, wäre es eine Lösung. Denn falls ein Flugzeug abstürzt, stürzt es nicht jedes Mal wie ein Kamikaze Flieger ab. Der Pilot sowie Co Pilot halten das Flugzeug so lange wie möglich in der Luft, sinken langsam und versuchen mit allen Mittelndenn Flieger soweit es ihnen möglich ist, stabil und sicher zu landen ob Notwasserung oder am Land. Doch es gibt Momente wo sie denn Flieger nur mehr ruhig halten können und nicht mehr zur einer Landung kommen können egal aus welchem Grund auch immer (Bsp ein Berg im Weg, ne Stadt oder was auch immer) es gibt immer etwas Zeit und vieleicht genügend Zeit um so viele Menschen wie möglich zu retten, es könnten vorher noch einen Absprung machen. Was meint ihr hätte es Sinn wenn man die Entscheidung hätte das Leben in die eigene Hand zu nehmen wenn man es könnte noch dazu wenn welche an Board wären die erfahrung hätten. Wenn man die Chance hätte um leben zu retten aber es nicht möglich ist weil man keine chance hat oder sie bekommt.
(2 votes)
Loading...
Not at all.
Most flight accidents happen when the plane is already close to the ground anyway. At the start or in the landing. Therefore, the pre-warning time is extremely short; usually, the pilots did not know that they would crash 2 minutes before the impact on the ground.
So that parachutes make sense, you would have to tell the passengers that they live safer with a parachute (with which you can break all bones when landing) than if the pilots try to bring the plane to the ground in some way. Then there’s a panic that you need to calm down. Then you have to put a parachute on every passenger, well noticed in the narrow cabin of an aircraft. And then all have to go through the few doors, which you can’t open with good reason in the flight. And all this in less than 2 minutes. I think you’d rather think about it again.
And the problem with unskilled parachute jumpers is not the opening of the screen. It’s the landing. Bring an 85-year-old Korean woman who doesn’t understand a word except Korean as she has to make the landing that she doesn’t die. That’s also part of your two minutes.
Magnificent depreciation, the problem with the Korean! 🫢 I think of myself lively and can only agree. no chance. Makes no sense at all.
The most dangerous flight phase is the landing or landing approach, e.g. by disorientation of the pilots and resulting collision with increasing terrain. In both cases, a falling skir does not use anything, either because of a lack of pre-warning time and because the falling skirm could not unfold due to the too low flight height.
But with a successful water emergency landing as with the US Airways flight 1549 on the Hudson River by Captain “Sully” Sullenberger rescue life vests.
In addition, a controlled exit of the passengers with the parachute from an uncontrollable aircraft would be practically impossible because the passengers are then completely incapable of movement due to the high G forces. The generally high G-forces penetrate the flute occupants where they are straight.
Even in a normal flight condition, it would hardly be possible to think of a controlled exit, since passenger aircraft do not have a wide rear loader ramp such as military transport aircraft, which allows a riskless departure without collision with the wings, engines or ladders.
And as long as the aircraft can still be controlled by the crew, an exit with the parachute does not make any sense, because the probability of survival for the passengers is then usually still very high, for example in the case of a one-sided engine failure by sucked-in large birds, called bird strike.
In the case of an exit to traveling husks, the low oxygen concentration would be death-proof in the case of the oxygen deficiency (the c lasts only a few seconds) or freeze.
There are therefore no cases where a security gain could be achieved by parachutes, except in the very rare case of an in-flight fire.
I give you absolutely right, yet I have also mentioned in my question that many dangers are known to me, such as height, temperature, speed, cabins pressure etc. I just wondered if there was only one percentage chance to save a few lives, it wouldn’t make sense. It always means planes are one of the safest means of transportation, yet there is a crash. Of course, there are much more accidents on the road, but if there is something that happens, there are not more than 200 people dying at once (so much would come to life in a 777)
If it were an idea to construct an aircraft which consists of several units from the front to the rear (e.g. 5 individual parts which function as a whole, in an incident, the bulkheads are closed in each compartment and side panels are blown off, etc., so that the departments are detached as 5 individual units from each other from the rest of the aircraft, and are in free fall, provided with automatic parachutes (as in a space probe that enters the atmosphereand then the parachutes appear)
I know that sounds like fiction and that it is rather unlikely, but it might be possible. What humanity has done and invented so far would be possible, but probably it would be too expensive for them and some human lives would not be worth it. They hope that the machine will come down as well as possible and safely if you can’t change anything and the airline and who knows who else would apologize to bring the families members with stupid answers to silence. Wouldn’t be like Malaysia Airlines for the first time, strange that there is a 777 of the radar vanishing over 4 different airspaces and no one notices it. Even more spectacular that the plane flew over a U.S. military base and nobody noticed, normally with the slightest suspicion that the plane would get too close to the restricted airspace, they would send out hunters immediately. But who knows what really happened.
The measures on the aircraft are taken on the basis of insurance requirements. Not because they really find it would be necessary. The insurance companies do not prescribe parachutes.