Did I do that roughly right (sources history)?
(1 votes)
Loading...Similar Posts
Key question about the Industrial Revolution in England?
Hi, I have to give a history lecture on the industrial revolution in England, but I can't think of a guiding question. Could someone please help me?
Use of glass before Christ?
Hello everyone, I wanted to ask what was already being done with glass in Rome around 100-50 BC and what it looked like ("porous" or smooth, rather milky or clear and transparent)? Any information can help me. Thank you!
Nickname for Alen?
BySuinNius
Hey, I'm currently writing a story that features a character named Alen. But I can't think of a suitable nickname. If you have an idea, please write it here.
Why are German cities so ugly?
Here are a few examples:
You presented the source very well. You called the time of creation and place of creation, the author, the occasion, the addressee, the intention and then the content. Great. Improve the whole spelling and comma errors, there are many. Some of your formulations are somewhat flaky (“and he then defeated them” etc.), you could reform a little.
From “Gaius Julius Caesar says…” – this is part of the text rendering
Otherwise content ok, good thing with the “to justify”.
But be careful with the formulation. Either “The text is aimed at the Romans, the campaign…” or “The text is about the Gallic campaign…”
I cannot see the connection with the history of your source. Then how should you be judged if you did that right?
Germanic Sueben was 51 B.C. not but only Sueben.