Dickere Eichel durch Beschneidung?

Even before my circumcision as a ten-year-old, I had a relatively large acorn which, under my fleshy, very long and by no means narrow pre-skin, was clearly degraded from the shank diameter. (For the good reasons for my circumcision, even without phimosis, I have already expressed very often in detail here at GF).

In puberty, my penis naturally increased in all dimensions – but my acorn was clearly extremely disproportionate; in diameter and volume as a whole. Her dominance has been quite strong and noticeable since then – which is probably due to the fact that my genital in the “public” nudity (redressing at sport, in the shower, in the sauna, at the nudist, etc.) appears to many – which leads to frequent unambiguous and intense views, and also repeatedly to comments and questions. What I’m interested and sometimes enjoying.

As a specialist, I can confirm the following: In fact, it is common that the acorn of a genital, whose foreskin has been removed before or during puberty, is then “expanded” better in growth due to this “freezing” and increases more strongly in diameter and volume than the acorn on an uncut penis, whose foreskin is always or predominantly pulled over the acorn. It is, by the way, irrelevant whether this pre-skin is then narrowed or not.

And now to the impression or rather the rare fact of a scorn that has become “thicker” by circumcision in adulthood, that is, after puberty:

In some cases, physical growth, in particular that of genitals, can reach to the middle of the third decade (i.e. up to about 25). Until then, circumcision can therefore tend to have an effect on the acorn growth as I have described it for puberty or before; if, in most cases, even in these rather rare cases, there is also much lower (less significant and less apparent “predominant”) than puberty time.

But I had patients who were circumcised in their early twenties, and then their acorn increased significantly and, above all, disproportionately in diameter. Most of the time, these patients also reported an overall perceived enlargement of their penis – which they believed to be due to circumcision. On demand, however, it was generally a later increase which would have taken place anyway. Without this thrust, it would probably not have come to the significant acorn enlargement, which, however, was strongly triggered by the circumcision.

Who else, as a man who has been trimmed in adulthood, has the impression of a “more thick acorn” as a result of circumcision, is usually subject to an optical illusion: The acorn exposed before trimming by backstriping of the foreskin then acted less concisely by the skin bead in the acorn furrow than after trimming, since then the furrow is free and the protruding acorn wreath appears more dominant.