The life?

My sense of life ðŸTM‚

2What can be understood by scientific methodology? This is when you set up a hypothesis, but what is a hypothesis? A statement that you think is correct. Suppose we have a statement that we think is correct. What do we do next? I’ll go find her. What happens if her hypothesis is wrong? It doesn’t matter, they just add their findings.No, what do they do when they investigate their hypothesis and something impossible happens? Something supernatural like ghosts? Ghosts ask aside. The curiosity and scepticism inherent in the scientific methodology can also be applied outside the research and the opposite. The ideology we can call absolute trust in what we believe in knowledge.This is the end, critical thinking and that is not good. The most terrible things in the world are done by people who are sure they are right. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Bin Laden, these people believe they possess an extraordinary knowledge and therefore have the right to do what they want, just because they can. Who can tell me about Ockham’s razor? The most logical explanation is usually the right explanation. Is Ockham a rule or a directive? A directive, because sometimes the most unbelievable explanations are actually the right explanations. How can we explain things that are too unlikely to be true?There are them. How supernatural? I’ll tell you something more bizarre than what we call supernatural. We know that the psychic laws that apply in the universe are specific and that even the smallest change in the weight of only a single type of superatomic particles would have great effects. No universe, no stars, no planets, no life, no consciousness and no entertainment between us. 😁 Unless they believe in a God whose existence is justified only by writing a relatively thin book about the laws of weight and behaviour of particles, because then we must assume that these rules would have been as different as possible. It’s almost like everything that would happen just to happen so we know it happened. This is called the antropical principle that all happens so that we know it happens. But there is a problem with this principle. What’s wrong with this idea? She takes us to the end. She assumes that we are the original form, even though we could actually be something like amoebes. Simple forms of life were necessary for our development. Similarly, we could be necessary for the development of something else. Humanity could be nothing more than an intermediate piece for the development of a thousand higher consciousness. We’ve already created him a network. In the millions of nodes communicating, the Internet. Every node for itself is only a stupid computer but don’t forget that every brain cell is too much less capable of itself. I think that will be much more special than we can imagine. Let’s hope if it gets an awareness that it’s nice to us. Do they believe computer consciousness is possible? I think that’s more likely we’ll kill each other before something interesting happens. You mean nuclear weapons? Yes or organic weapons, nanomachines or the exhaustion of our resources. Until we finally erased everything here. Why would we want that? I don’t think we want this as much as a white shark wants to be a predator. But he does what he does. So they think people are just evil. Evil is a by-product of humanity, think of people what they do. We are a perfect planet suicide machine, we just need to drive, consume, start family. Nothing is more effective than human reproduction if you want to accelerate the erosion of the planet. You don’t even have to do something spectacular to work with the project, the end of the world. We do what we do. We’re rats on a ship, ants on an ice-cream. We’re just going one piece. Everything ends at some point, but the most important question is. Ends it with a bang or an eyelash, and in the meantime it doesn’t matter. 😁