Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
10 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rudim1950
10 years ago

Hello,

There are many rumors on the Internet and also on every topic. However, in aviation: “Stick on the facts!”

And we have them again, our three problems:

1) Why do you ask here? GF is also an internet platform on which rumours, speculations, mutations broil on many topics.

2) Have you at least researched the corresponding answers to the topic at GF? Finally, this question has been asked many times – of course, always with contradictory answers. So who do you trust now?

3) So how about an info from people who really need to know, the aero-medical pilot?

Internet competence is invoked by so many politicians. So let’s look for a fix at the LBA (Airport Federal Office) and look into the list of centers that are allowed to carry out a first examination for pilots. There is address and telephone number, so just call and ask. One of the centers is, by the way, the former FMI of the Bw in Fürstenfeldbruck (the LBA list is not up-to-date), today “Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrtmedizin der Bundeswehr” (ZentrLuRMedLw) in Cologne (which also make civil investigations). You can ask how it looks at the Bw in fighter pilots and clear all the mutations.

The result is then set as a tip – of course with the appropriate reference – here. I can calm you down: The EU regulation on flying personnel, the EU-VO 1178/2011, explicitly does not provide any information on the condition of teeth, but … it means under

MED.B.080 Neck, nose and ears (for finen on page 2011R1178 — DE — 08.04.2012 — 000.003 — 221)

“a” Applicants neither congenital nor acquired active or chronic functional disorders or diseases of ears, nose, nasal cavity or throat, including oral cavity, Teeth and throat head, as well as no surgical or trauma sequences have may affect the safe exercise of the rights associated with the applicable licence(s).’

So only the assessment by the flyer physician remains, no matter what the GF experts say or advise.

Oh, yes, here is the complete reference (I must adhere to my own claim;-)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying down technical rules and administrative procedures relating to civil aviation flying personnel …’ This is the German translation to find at LBA

http://www.lba.de/DE/Aeronautical staff/Aeronautics/legal regulations_L5_neu_09042013.html?n=23210

Click the 2nd link and then look at the above page.

rudim1950
10 years ago
Reply to  grossbeeren

Thanks for the star!

5432123456789
10 years ago

I’ve heard something stupid.

struempfchen
10 years ago

I don’t think plombs are a big thing in line pilots. In combat pilots, maybe. Otherwise the passengers shouldn’t have any.? Especially scheduled pilots don’t fly alone.

Pilotflying
10 years ago

Good to know. There’s almost no more pilots.

Perhaps I have forgotten what to say in the last request for a deafness examination 🙁

Help – from tomorrow I and many others will also be unemployed!!! Because they must not wear glasses, have no weight of kilos, no hair loss and much more. Poor pilots!

Greetings from a pilot with glasses on the nose, too much on the ribs and plombs in the teeth:-)

dahlien100
10 years ago

This applies to all pilots

Luftkutscher
10 years ago
Reply to  dahlien100

Also sailplanes and helicopter pilots?

rudim1950
10 years ago
Reply to  Luftkutscher

And ballooners, airship guides, UL planes? Finally, those mentioned in the EU-VO are also mentioned.

And what about the model aircraft pilots? If it wasn’t so much fun, you shouldn’t comment any more, but just set the references. But that would be half of the pleasure.

Luftkutscher
10 years ago

Fortunately, my pilot doctor regularly overlooks that I not only have a plomb, but even an inlay in my teeth.