Da die Zeit für sich schnell bewegende Dinge langsamer vergeht, altert man langsamer wenn man sich schneller bewegt?
Wenn ja, führt regelmäßige, schnelle Bewegung dazu, dass man dann etwas jünger ist, als wenn man sich nicht so oft schnell bewegt?
Abgesehen von der Gesundheit.
so it is.
only the effect at “normal” speeds is so low that it plays no role.
If I didn’t count on the speed:
If someone is always 100 km/h faster than his environment (day and night) and this person becomes 100 years old, then at the end of his life this person is aged less than 2.5 minutes less than his environment
you do not notice anything, because time dilation is only visible from the other inertial system. And you already need relative speeds that are not too small against the speed of light. Or as Einstein never said: who drives too fast is not old.
You would have to get close to the speed of light so that it would have relevance. And you won’t succeed.
Hello Krea12345,
the formulation is misleading. When I look at you and your watch U as resting (reference clock) and I move to you for a while with the speed v, the time clock of my watch is as by the factor
(1) : = 1/√{1 − (v⁄c)2}
to interpret, i.e., for me we are Your Clock U at this factor faster. But it is not a young fountain; If I could be so fast that I would age significantly more slowly, I would also experience less time.
Why do I say “relative to you”, and why do I make the restriction “if I consider you… as resting? Well, assumed, a clock U’ moves at constant speed v› relative to U and You.
Then I can do according to GALILEIs Principle of relativity (RP), on which the special relativity theory (SRT) is based, also see U’ as resting and for this U as a clock moving with −v› (same speed, opposite direction). Whether U or U’ moves and thus goes slower, is therefore a matter of interpretation – which contradicts seems to be. This apparent contradiction is the basis of Zwillingsparadoxons.
In order to understand what is going on, it is necessary to make it clear that it is not really the Room the time, but only the Timetable there.
So actually you travel Minimum in the future?
The beautiful thing is that you can further develop your own answers, which I recently started.
After the coordinate time of U, yes. But it must be said that time has a direction to some extent.
Theoretically one ages more slowly, but practically one is too slow. You need such a fast movement that you can’t translate it at all. But for yourself, time would be the same, so you wouldn’t notice a difference.
You have to move quickly. So at least 90% of the speed of light.
Otherwise, yes exercise is good for health.