Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
21 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joshua18
1 year ago

Of course not, but indirectly possibly already, because the sugar substitutes cause a large amount of metabolism. That we used in the pig’s mast, that’s the sweets.

Aliha
1 year ago
Reply to  Joshua18

That we used in the pig’s mast, that’s the sweets.

How long will this fairy tale be rebubbed?

Skibomor
1 year ago

Basically, nothing makes “dick”. It always depends on the total amount of calories. Coca-Cola Zero has no calories…

PandaMii123
1 year ago

Yes, it makes indirectly thick, because the sweetener still stimulates insulin production.

As a result, the blood sugar level drops in the blood and a strong feeling of hunger begins later.

Therefore, sweetener was already used at the pork moss if the pigs do not want to eat well and remain tedious.

nnnnnnn968
1 year ago

Because it doesn’t have calories, no.

And in principle, a calorie surplus makes “thick” over a certain period of time.

Lg

verreisterNutzer
1 year ago

No. Not really.

Jan

ethan227
1 year ago

Coca Cola Zero doesn’t have calories, it doesn’t make you fat. 🙂

zxinxb9
1 year ago

No, no, no.

Fhhzjjs
1 year ago
Reply to  zxinxb9

What of course makes the fat that is full of sugar

verreisterNutzer
1 year ago

Doesn’t have any calories.

Sophia749
1 year ago

No.

Fhhzjjs
1 year ago

Yes and again

Kleib
1 year ago

No…

Jael1898
1 year ago

yes, is still a baptism of unhealthy substances

Curasanus
1 year ago

In practice: yes, although it has no calories. Only in theory does it not make thick.

SweetKitty36849
1 year ago

Really?

SweetKitty36849
1 year ago

How the hell would that be possible?

Anson12
1 year ago

Yeah, they do.

Darkn3ss916
1 year ago
Reply to  Anson12

Why?

xNevan
1 year ago
Reply to  Anson12

How?